Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 59 83
1440p QHD 60 80 91 128
1080p Full HD 81 109 124 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 80
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 83
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing all presets at those resolutions clearing the 60 FPS threshold. However, the combination struggles at 4K, where only the Low preset remains playable, indicating that this is a system best suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming rather than native 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset (83 FPS average) clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium (59 FPS average) falls just short, while High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) are not playable.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p that maintains 60 FPS?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers exactly 60 FPS average, making it the most demanding playable option at that resolution. The Medium preset offers 91 FPS average, and Low runs at 128 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129), 1% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862), and 1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852).

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466), 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342), and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600 (44889).

Q: Is the 1080p performance sufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the data shows 175 FPS on Low, 124 FPS on Medium, 109 FPS on High, and 81 FPS on Ultra, meaning even the most demanding preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin.

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU-GPU combo among tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 2194 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the database, which aligns with its 59th percentile GPU ranking and 89th percentile CPU ranking.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rate scales dramatically with preset changes: Low hits 175 FPS, Medium drops to 124 FPS, High falls to 109 FPS, and Ultra lands at 81 FPS. This wide spread of 94 FPS between Low and Ultra indicates the GPU is the dominant constraint at 1080p, as the CPU is likely feeding frames faster than the RX 9060 can render them at lower settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve compresses somewhat. Low delivers 128 FPS, Medium runs at 91 FPS, High at 80 FPS, and Ultra at 60 FPS. The 68 FPS gap between Low and Ultra shows the GPU still carries most of the load, but the reduced absolute frame rates suggest both components are becoming more balanced. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3494 in PassMark) and high L3 cache (96 MB shared) help maintain playable frame rates even as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes overwhelmingly the limiting factor. Low produces 83 FPS, Medium drops to 59 FPS, High falls to 51 FPS, and Ultra collapses to 39 FPS. The 44 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K, combined with the fact that no preset above Low clears 60 FPS, indicates the RX 9060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 4K rendering. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 191.4 GPixel/s pixel rate become the hard ceiling.

The scaling patterns point to a system where the RX 9060 is the primary performance arbiter at every resolution, but the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 6 cores and 12 threads with 96 MB of L3 cache ensure that CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions do not limit frame rates. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU can push well beyond 175 FPS, meaning the GPU's rendering speed is the only thing preventing higher frame rates at lower presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 81 FPS average. This is the most demanding setting that maintains playability, and it does so with a comfortable 21 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset runs at 109 FPS, Medium at 124 FPS, and Low at 175 FPS, but Ultra provides the full visual experience without sacrificing the 60 FPS requirement.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves exactly 60 FPS average, making it the highest-quality playable option. This is a razor-thin margin, so players wanting more headroom could drop to High at 80 FPS or Medium at 91 FPS. The data shows that Ultra at 1440p is viable, but it leaves no room for frame rate dips below the playable threshold in demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, producing 83 FPS average. The Medium preset falls short at 59 FPS, which is technically below the 60 FPS playable threshold, while High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) are not viable for smooth gameplay. The 4K resolution demands a more powerful GPU than the RX 9060 to run higher presets.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the answer depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with the verdictByResolution data confirming all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable. The Ultra preset at 81 FPS average is the best experience, offering maximum visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold by 21 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system also passes with all presets playable, but the Ultra preset at exactly 60 FPS average is the standout result. This is a playable configuration, though the tight margin suggests that players who prioritize consistent frame rates might prefer High at 80 FPS or Medium at 91 FPS for additional headroom.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is mixed. Only the Low preset (83 FPS) is playable, while Medium (59 FPS) misses the threshold by just 1 FPS. High and Ultra are not viable options. This means the system can technically run the game at 4K, but only with reduced visual fidelity. The data indicates that 4K gaming at higher presets would require a more powerful GPU than the RX 9060.

Overall, this combo is an excellent 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, with strong performance across all presets at those resolutions. At 4K, it is limited to Low settings, which may be acceptable for competitive play but falls short for those seeking high-detail visuals.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D's closest CPU rivals, based on average benchmark scores, all fall within a narrow performance band. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) is 0.2% slower, the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342) is 0.5% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) is 0.6% slower. The Intel Core i5-14600 (44889) is 0.7% faster. These deltas are all sub-1%, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the GPU is the same.

On the GPU side, the RX 9060's nearest rivals show similarly tight deltaPct values. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) is 0.7% faster, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862) is 1% slower, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852) is 1% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679) is 2.1% slower. These differences are within a few percentage points, indicating that swapping the RX 9060 for any of these cards would produce comparable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.

For users considering alternative hardware, the data suggests that the RTX 3060 Ti would offer a marginal performance uplift, while the RX 7700 would be nearly identical. The R9 370X and Pro W5500 would be slightly slower, but the differences are small enough that the gaming experience would feel similar in practice. The CPU alternatives are all within 1% of the Ryzen 5 7500X3D, so no meaningful performance change would occur from swapping processors.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 2194 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the 59th percentile of all tested configurations, which is a solid mid-pack result. The ranking reflects the GPU's 59th percentile standing among all GPUs, while the CPU sits much higher at the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

The disparity between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's mid-range percentile explains the overall combo ranking. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a top-tier processor, but the RX 9060 holds the combo back from reaching the upper echelons of the rankings. In Lockdown Protocol, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, the combo's ranking is largely determined by the GPU's 17631 PassMark G3D score.

Compared to the 3714 total combos tested, this system sits in the lower half of the upper two-thirds, meaning it outperforms roughly 59% of all configurations. This is a respectable position for a mainstream CPU-GPU pairing. The data shows that for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo delivers excellent performance, but for 4K gaming, it falls short of the top-tier systems in the database. The 2194 rank is a direct reflection of this balanced but not exceptional performance profile, with the CPU providing ample headroom for future GPU upgrades.