Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 118 | 135 | 191 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 161 | 185 | 260 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers strong performance in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing playable frame rates at every resolution tested, from 1080p Ultra to 4K High settings. The pairing ranks 874th out of 3,714 tested combinations, placing it in the top quarter of all systems benchmarked for this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 5 7500F sits in a tight cluster of comparable CPUs based on average benchmark scores. The closest match is the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, which scores 25,005 versus the 7500F's 24,964 average—a negligible 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-11850H trails by just 0.1% with a score of 24,935, while the Intel Core i7-13620H posts 24,911 (0.2% behind) and the Intel Core 5 210H finishes at 24,872 (0.4% behind). In practical terms, swapping between any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with the 7500F's 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 architecture proving statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate performance.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 places it alongside some unexpected company. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 matches within 0.1% at 37,628, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 comes within 0.4% at 37,507. More relevantly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, which is 1.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 trails by 1.3% at 37,157. These deltas are small enough that in an actual gaming scenario, the RTX 4070 would deliver effectively the same experience as the RTX 4080 Mobile, while the desktop-class RX Vega 56 would be a closer competitor than its older architecture might suggest.
The practical takeaway is that this combo behaves like any system built around these performance tiers. A buyer choosing the Ryzen 5 8400F instead of the 7500F, or swapping the RTX 4070 for an RTX 4080 Mobile, would see no meaningful difference in Lockdown Protocol frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern: the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases, while the CPU's role diminishes. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 260 FPS average, which is the highest result in the entire dataset. This suggests the CPU is feeding the GPU efficiently enough that the RTX 4070 becomes the limiting factor even at this modest resolution.
Scaling from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows a drop from 260 FPS to 191 FPS—a 26.5% reduction that corresponds closely to the pixel count increase of 77.8% between these resolutions. The fact that frame rates don't drop proportionally to pixel count indicates that at 1080p, the system is partially CPU-bound, and the GPU has headroom to spare. Moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low sees a further decline to 123 FPS, a 35.6% reduction, which aligns more closely with the 2.25x pixel increase, confirming that at 4K the RTX 4070 is now the primary constraint.
The preset scaling tells the same story. At 4K, Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS average, falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold, while High maintains 76 FPS. At 1440p, all four presets remain playable, with Ultra at 89 FPS. At 1080p, even Ultra sustains 121 FPS. The consistent pattern—where higher resolutions compress the gap between Low and Ultra—indicates that Lockdown Protocol's graphics settings scale primarily with GPU load, and the Ryzen 5 7500F provides sufficient single-thread performance (3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core) to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 4070 at any tested configuration.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 874th out of 3,714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 76.5th percentile of all systems benchmarked. This is a strong result, but not an elite one—the data shows that roughly a quarter of tested configurations outperform this pairing. The CPU itself sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, and the GPU at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, so the combo's overall rank is slightly below what those individual percentiles might suggest.
This gap likely reflects the nature of Lockdown Protocol as a competitive FPS title where high refresh rates at lower resolutions matter more than raw 4K capability. The RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game's demands, but the combo's 4K Ultra result of 57 FPS shows that it cannot max out the game at the highest resolution. The 874th rank also implies that many systems with higher-end GPUs—such as those in the RTX 4080 class—achieve better 4K performance, while the 7500F's mid-range CPU status keeps it behind top-tier processors in CPU-limited scenarios.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K?
A: Yes, at 4K the combo achieves playable frame rates on High (76 FPS), Medium (87 FPS), and Low (123 FPS) settings. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable. Ultra delivers 89 FPS average, which is the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS. Medium runs at 135 FPS, High at 118 FPS, and Low at 191 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest GPU rival in this game?
A: The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 is 1.3% lower than the RTX 4080 Mobile's 38,135, meaning the two cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The gap is well within run-to-run variance.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080 Low, the combo hits 260 FPS average. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p (260 to 191 FPS) is less than the pixel count increase, suggesting the CPU does limit performance at the lowest resolution and settings, but the impact is minor since frame rates remain exceptionally high.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Ultra?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo delivers 121 FPS average. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and remains smooth for competitive play.
Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times?
A: Medium preset measurements show tight minimum and maximum values across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the range is 157-213 FPS with a 185 FPS average. At 1440p Medium, it's 115-156 FPS with a 135 FPS average. At 4K Medium, it's 74-101 FPS with an 87 FPS average. The narrow ranges indicate stable frame pacing.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the dataset shows a complete progression across all four presets. Low settings produce the highest average at 260 FPS, followed by Medium at 185 FPS with a range of 157-213 FPS. High drops to 161 FPS, and Ultra maintains 121 FPS. All configurations exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin, with even the most demanding preset delivering double the required frame rate.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges with lower absolute numbers. Low leads at 191 FPS, Medium follows at 135 FPS (115-156 FPS range), High reaches 118 FPS, and Ultra holds 89 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 102 FPS compared to 139 FPS at 1080p, reflecting the increased GPU load at higher resolution.
At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low achieves 123 FPS, Medium drops to 87 FPS (74-101 FPS range), High falls to 76 FPS, and Ultra dips to 57 FPS—the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold. The 66 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is the smallest across all resolutions, confirming that the GPU is fully saturated at this resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers 121 FPS average. This is the optimal configuration for 1080p gaming, providing maximum visual quality while still offering a 61 FPS margin above the playable threshold. The 121 FPS result also ensures compatibility with 120 Hz displays.
At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best choice, producing 89 FPS average. This stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold with a 29 FPS buffer, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors up to 144 Hz, though not fully saturating them.
At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, which yields 76 FPS average. Ultra falls to 57 FPS, below the threshold, so High represents the maximum visual quality that maintains smooth gameplay. The 76 FPS result provides a 16 FPS margin over the minimum requirement, which is adequate but less forgiving than lower resolutions. Players seeking higher frame rates at 4K can step down to Medium (87 FPS) or Low (123 FPS), but High offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.