Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

67%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
63 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
100 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
64 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
11.9ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 40 46 64
1440p QHD 46 62 71 100
1080p Full HD 63 84 96 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 84
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 96
1920x1080 Ultra 63
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Low 100
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 64
3840x2160 Medium 46
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B570 ranks 2987th out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower half of all possible configurations for this title. This mid-pack ranking is driven by GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong single-threaded capabilities keep frame rates competitive at 1080p. The data indicates this is a viable 1080p gaming setup capable of hitting 60+ FPS at every preset, with diminishing returns as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

At position 2987 out of 3714 combos, the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570 combination sits in the 20th percentile of all tested configurations for Lockdown Protocol. This ranking is modest, but context matters: the combination's average benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 20556 puts it in the 65th percentile against all GPUs. The gap between component-level percentiles and the combo's in-game ranking suggests that Lockdown Protocol's engine does not fully leverage this hardware pairing.

The CPU holds its own against direct rivals. The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H, 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H, and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core 5 210H, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2%. These margins are negligible, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance. For the GPU, the Arc B570 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 0.1% delta, matches the Intel Arc A750 exactly at -0.1%, and sits within 0.5% of both the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. The practical takeaway: this combo performs like a mid-range 2023-2024 desktop solution, not a top-tier frame rate champion.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570 across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU's six Zen 4 cores with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provide enough headroom to let the GPU stretch its legs. The jump from Low to Medium settings drops average FPS from 136 to 96, a 29% reduction, while moving from Medium to High costs another 12.5% (96 to 84 FPS). This scaling pattern indicates that at 1080p, the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the primary bottleneck, not the processor.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's workload intensifies, and the CPU's role diminishes further. Average FPS at Low settings falls from 136 at 1080p to 100 at 1440p, a 26.5% drop that tracks with the increased pixel count. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient to feed the GPU here, as evidenced by the Medium preset still holding 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS. The 3840x2160 results confirm this trend: the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor, with even Low settings producing only 64 FPS, a mere 36% of the 1080p Low result. This is textbook GPU-bound behavior, where the CPU's 6379 max-thread 3DMark score becomes irrelevant to final frame output.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 136 FPS, Medium averages 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 111 FPS, High averages 84 FPS, and Ultra manages 63 FPS. The Ultra preset's 63 FPS average is the tightest margin above the playable threshold, leaving only 3 FPS of headroom. The Medium preset's 82 FPS minimum is particularly notable, indicating stable frame pacing without severe dips.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results compress downward. Low averages 100 FPS, a 26.5% reduction from 1080p. Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS, meaning the minimum exactly hits the playable threshold—any scene heavier than the test workload would likely drop below 60. High averages 62 FPS, just 2 FPS above the threshold, while Ultra falls to 46 FPS, rendering it unplayable at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset remains viable. It averages 64 FPS, which is the exact playable threshold plus 4 FPS. Medium drops to 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS and maximum of 52 FPS, while High manages 40 FPS and Ultra bottoms out at 30 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 18 FPS (64 vs 46), a 28% performance penalty for stepping up one preset tier, making it clear that 4K gaming requires significant settings sacrifices with this hardware.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies dramatically by resolution. At 1920x1080, the answer is an unambiguous yes: every preset—Low at 136 FPS, Medium at 96 FPS, High at 84 FPS, and Ultra at 63 FPS—exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. Gamers with 1080p monitors can play at Ultra settings and still maintain a playable frame rate, though the 3 FPS margin above the threshold means demanding scenes could cause occasional stutter.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is conditional. Three presets—Low at 100 FPS, Medium at 71 FPS, and High at 62 FPS—clear 60 FPS, but Ultra at 46 FPS does not. The High preset's 62 FPS average is workable, yet the 2 FPS margin above the threshold offers minimal buffer for frame drops. The Medium preset, with its 60 FPS minimum, is the safest choice for consistent performance at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is barely positive. Only the Low preset at 64 FPS clears the threshold, and its 4 FPS margin is fragile. Medium at 46 FPS, High at 40 FPS, and Ultra at 30 FPS all fail the playability test. The data suggests that 4K owners should either accept Low settings or lower their resolution, as the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are stretched too thin at this pixel count with higher presets.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows an average of 63 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is 3 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the only preset at this resolution with a margin under 20 FPS, so expect occasional dips in complex scenes.

Q: What is the best 1440p preset for this system?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 delivers 62 FPS average, which is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS. However, Medium at 71 FPS with a 60 FPS minimum provides more consistent frame pacing and is the safer choice for competitive play.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570?

A: Only at Low settings, which averages 64 FPS. Medium drops to 46 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K Low result has just a 4 FPS margin above playable, so performance may vary by scene.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals for this game?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the Intel Core i7-11850H by 0.1%, the Intel Core i7-13620H by 0.2%, and the Intel Core 5 210H by 0.4%. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2%. These differences are within measurement noise and would not produce perceptible FPS differences.

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 on average, which is 0.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% below the Intel Arc A750. Interestingly, it sits 0.4% above the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and 0.5% below the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, showing the Arc B570's performance spans a wide range of legacy and current GPUs.

Q: Which component limits performance at 4K resolution?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck at 3840x2160. The Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate cannot sustain high preset frame rates at 4K, regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking becomes irrelevant when the GPU is saturated.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 63 FPS. This grants maximum visual quality while maintaining playability, though the margin is slim.

At 2560x1440, the best preset is High, averaging 62 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (71 FPS) while staying just above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the optimal balance of quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the only preset that clears 60 FPS is Low, averaging 64 FPS. This is the sole playable configuration at 4K, and users prioritizing frame rate stability should consider 1440p Medium or High instead, as the 4K Low margin is minimal.