Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 47 | 57 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 77 | 87 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 101 | 118 | 169 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, but 4K gaming requires significant compromises. Benchmark data shows this combo is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p across most presets, while 4K is limited to the Low preset for a smooth experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination performs exceptionally well across all settings. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 75.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold with a comfortable margin. High settings push performance to 100.8 FPS average, while Medium reaches 118.2 FPS. The Low preset produces a substantial 168.6 FPS average, indicating the CPU-GPU pairing has ample headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a predictable performance curve, with each step up in fidelity costing roughly 30-40 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the results remain strong but show the increased pixel load. The High preset maintains a solid 77.3 FPS average, which is still above the 60 FPS target. Medium settings achieve 86.8 FPS, and Low settings reach 121.4 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 54.7 FPS average, falling just short of the playability threshold. This represents a 27.8% performance reduction from High to Ultra at this resolution, illustrating that the most demanding settings require careful consideration on 1440p panels.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Only the Low preset delivers playable performance at 78.1 FPS average. Medium settings drop to exactly 57.0 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target by a narrow 3 FPS margin. High settings produce 47.3 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 35.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is a substantial 42.9 FPS, showing that this resolution demands either reduced fidelity or a more powerful GPU.
The data reveals a consistent pattern: the RX 7600 XT handles the game's rendering requirements well at lower resolutions, but 4K Ultra is clearly beyond its capabilities. The measured FPS values show no minimum or maximum frame data, so the analysis relies on average performance, which is generally representative for a fast-paced FPS title.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?
A: Yes, all four presets at 1920x1080 exceed 60 FPS. The lowest performer, Ultra, still manages 75.2 FPS average, while Low reaches 168.6 FPS, making this resolution fully playable with no compromises.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce 77.3 FPS average, which is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra drops to 54.7 FPS, so it should be avoided for competitive play, though it remains technically playable for casual sessions.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only with the Low preset, which delivers 78.1 FPS average. Medium settings hit exactly 57.0 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold, while High and Ultra produce 47.3 FPS and 35.2 FPS respectively, making them too slow for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24,964 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2% and leads the Intel Core 5 210H by 0.4%.
Q: What is the GPU's benchmark position relative to other cards?
A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17,083, placing it 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and 0.4% above the AMD Radeon HD 7970M. It sits 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M4.
Q: Does the system have enough performance headroom for future updates?
A: At 1080p, there is substantial headroom, with Low settings reaching 168.6 FPS and Ultra at 75.2 FPS. At 1440p, the headroom is moderate, with High at 77.3 FPS. At 4K, there is virtually no headroom, as only the Low preset clears 60 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between the Ryzen 5 7500F and the RX 7600 XT. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is more prominent relative to the GPU, as the graphics card has ample pixel throughput to handle the lower resolution. The 168.6 FPS at Low settings demonstrates that the CPU can feed frames quickly enough to saturate the GPU's capabilities. The 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provides strong single-threaded performance, which matters in FPS titles where draw calls and game logic often bottleneck at high frame rates.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more significant. The pixel count rises by 78%, and the RX 7600 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth must work harder to fill the frame buffer. The drop from 168.6 FPS at 1080p Low to 121.4 FPS at 1440p Low — a 28% reduction — shows the GPU starting to feel the load, though the CPU still has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The 4K resolution contains four times as many pixels as 1080p, requiring the Radeon's 2048 shading units to process significantly more work. The Ultra preset's 35.2 FPS average at 4K versus 75.2 FPS at 1080p Ultra represents a 53% performance drop, far exceeding what CPU scaling alone would produce. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and Zen 4 architecture are more than sufficient for this game's CPU demands, but the RX 7600 XT's 128-bit memory bus and 22.57 TFLOPS compute power cannot sustain high settings at 4K.
The data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where neither component consistently bottlenecks the other. At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive constraint, and the CPU's performance advantages become largely irrelevant to the final frame rate. The 65 W TDP CPU and 190 W TDP GPU work together efficiently, with the system's overall capability defined by the graphics card at higher resolutions.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol with playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K requires significant setting reductions. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 75.2 FPS average and High reaching 100.8 FPS. This resolution offers the most flexibility, allowing players to prioritize visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the system maintains playability at High, Medium, and Low presets. High settings produce 77.3 FPS average, which is the recommended configuration for balanced visuals and performance. The Ultra preset's 54.7 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS target, though it remains close enough for less demanding players to consider.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 78.1 FPS average. Medium settings hit exactly 57.0 FPS, which is technically below the threshold but may be acceptable for some users. High and Ultra settings produce 47.3 FPS and 35.2 FPS averages respectively, which are too low for a competitive FPS experience.
The overall verdict is positive: this is a solid 1080p and 1440p gaming system for Lockdown Protocol, with the caveat that 4K gaming demands either Low settings or a GPU upgrade. The combo ranks 2435th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle range of the benchmark database.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers 75.2 FPS average. This is the optimal choice for players with 1080p displays who want maximum visual fidelity without performance concerns. The 15.2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold provides enough headroom to avoid noticeable frame drops during intense combat sequences.
For 2560x1440, the best settings configuration is High, producing 77.3 FPS average. This preset balances image quality with performance, offering a 17.3 FPS safety margin above the playability threshold. Players seeking higher fidelity must accept the 54.7 FPS average at Ultra, which sacrifices smoothness for marginally better visuals.
At 3840x2160, the only viable option is Low, which achieves 78.1 FPS average. This is surprising in that the Low preset at 4K outperforms the Ultra preset at 1440p by 23.4 FPS, but it comes at the cost of significantly reduced graphical details. The Medium preset's 57.0 FPS average is technically unplayable by the 60 FPS standard, though the 3 FPS gap may be tolerable for some users.
The recommended configurations align with the verdict data: Ultra at 1080p, High at 1440p, and Low at 4K. Each of these settings provides the best visual quality while maintaining the 60 FPS playability threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination ranks 2435th out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 34th percentile of all systems. This position reflects the GPU's mid-range status — the RX 7600 XT sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 77th percentile among all processors.
The ranking suggests that the system's overall performance is constrained by the graphics card rather than the processor. The CPU's strong benchmark position — 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H — indicates it is not the limiting factor. The GPU's 60th percentile standing, with a 0.7% deficit versus the RTX 3070, more closely matches the combo's overall rank.
This mid-tier placement means the system is competitive with other mainstream gaming PCs but falls short of high-end configurations. The ranking of 2435 out of 3714 puts it ahead of roughly one-third of tested systems, which is consistent with its measured performance at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, the system's rank would likely be lower, as the GPU's limitations become more pronounced at higher resolutions.
The data indicates that this combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with performance that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS target at those resolutions. The 4K experience is limited to Low settings, which reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning. For players targeting 1080p or 1440p displays, this system offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU capabilities, while 4K enthusiasts would need to consider a more powerful graphics card to achieve higher quality settings.