Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 72 | 81 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 108 | 125 | 180 |
| 1080p Full HD | 112 | 149 | 173 | 244 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a robust performance profile for Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS that demands high frame rates for smooth aiming and reaction times. The measured data, derived from actual benchmark runs, shows this combination provides a wide range of playable settings across common resolutions. The analysis below breaks down the performance envelope, comparing this specific combo against other tested configurations and detailing exactly what frame rates to expect at each setting level and resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold varies significantly by resolution. The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy, with the system's headroom shrinking as pixel count increases.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the highest preset that remains playable is High, delivering an average of 72.3 FPS. Pushing to Ultra drops the average to 52.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for smooth gameplay. Low and Medium also clear the bar, with 116.5 FPS and 80.5 FPS respectively, but High offers the best visual fidelity while staying comfortably above the playable line.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system has enough headroom to run the most demanding Ultra preset at an average of 81.7 FPS. This is a significant jump from 4K, showing that the resolution reduction provides a substantial performance boost. All other settings—High, Medium, and Low—also remain playable, with averages of 107.6 FPS, 124.8 FPS, and 180.2 FPS respectively.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system is fully unleashed. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 112.4 FPS, providing an excellent experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. Lowering settings yields even higher numbers, with High at 149.3 FPS, Medium at 173.2 FPS, and Low at a staggering 243.9 FPS. The 1080p results suggest the CPU and GPU combination is well-balanced, with neither component bottlenecking the other in this title.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1151 out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This puts it in the upper third of all systems, indicating strong overall capability. The rank is derived from the combined benchmark scores of both the Ryzen 5 7500F and the RX 6800 XT, and it reflects a system that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while still being viable for 4K at high settings.
The percentile data is also telling. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile among all processors, meaning it outperforms 77% of CPUs in the database. The GPU is even stronger, ranking in the 85th percentile among all graphics cards. This suggests the GPU is a slightly more dominant factor in this combo's overall ranking, a point that becomes clearer when examining the resolution scaling below.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following figures are directly from the measured FPS data.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 116.5 FPS average
- Medium: 80.5 FPS average
- High: 72.3 FPS average
- Ultra: 52.5 FPS average
The spread from Low to Ultra is a dramatic 64 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the graphics card is heavily taxed, and the preset choice has a profound impact on performance. The jump from High to Ultra is particularly steep (a drop of nearly 20 FPS), suggesting that Ultra settings at this resolution require more GPU resources than the RX 6800 XT can comfortably provide.
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 180.2 FPS average
- Medium: 124.8 FPS average
- High: 107.6 FPS average
- Ultra: 81.7 FPS average
At 1440p, the performance is more balanced. The scaling between settings is still significant, but the gap between High and Ultra narrows to about 26 FPS. The system is clearly less constrained here, with even the most demanding preset producing a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 243.9 FPS average
- Medium: 173.2 FPS average
- High: 149.3 FPS average
- Ultra: 112.4 FPS average
At 1080p, the numbers skyrocket. The Low preset average of 243.9 FPS is nearly double the High preset at 4K. This suggests that the frame rate is no longer limited by the GPU at lower resolutions, and the CPU's performance becomes the primary driver. The Ultra preset still manages a very respectable 112.4 FPS, which is a strong result for a modern FPS title.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with the Ultra preset?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 52.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at this resolution is High, which achieves 72.3 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, as it is the most demanding setting that still achieves a playable frame rate. The measured average is 81.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the performance scale between 1440p and 1080p at Ultra settings?
A: The performance difference is substantial. At 2560x1440 with Ultra, the average FPS is 81.7. Dropping to 1920x1080 with Ultra increases the average to 112.4 FPS, a gain of roughly 30 FPS. This indicates the system has significant headroom at lower resolutions.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a strong CPU compared to others in the database?
A: Yes, the CPU is in the 77th percentile of all processors. Its average benchmark score is 24964, which places it very close to rivals like the Intel Core i7-11850H (score 24935) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (score 25005).
Q: Is the RX 6800 XT a high-performing GPU?
A: Yes, it ranks in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 48477. It performs slightly above the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile (score 47743) and slightly below the Intel Arc A550M (score 49737).
Q: Are there any settings at 4K that are not playable?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 is not playable, with an average of 52.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. All other settings (Low, Medium, High) are playable at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in which component is the primary performance driver depending on the resolution. This is visible in the scaling between presets and resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The massive frame rate drop from 116.5 FPS at Low to 52.5 FPS at Ultra shows that the RX 6800 XT is working at its limit. The CPU's role is less impactful here, as the graphics card is the bottleneck for all but the lowest settings. The 4K results are almost entirely a story of GPU rasterization power.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift. The performance is still strongly influenced by the GPU, as evidenced by the scaling from 180.2 FPS at Low to 81.7 FPS at Ultra. However, the overall frame rates are high enough to suggest the CPU is now keeping pace more effectively. The system is better balanced, and neither component is severely limiting the other.
At 1920x1080, the CPU's role becomes more pronounced. The fact that the Low preset can produce 243.9 FPS suggests the GPU is no longer the primary bottleneck. The CPU, with its strong single-thread performance (a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218), is capable of feeding frames to the GPU at a very high rate. The scaling here is still steep, but the absolute numbers indicate that the Ryzen 5 7500F is a critical enabler for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. The CPU's 12 threads and Zen 4 architecture provide the processing power needed to avoid holding the GPU back.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol effectively across all common resolutions. The verdict by resolution is clear.
At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally strong. All presets, including Ultra, clear the 60 FPS threshold with significant margin, with the Ultra preset achieving 112.4 FPS. This is an ideal setup for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the system is also excellent. The Ultra preset runs at 81.7 FPS, which is a very smooth and responsive experience. The data confirms that 1440p is a sweet spot for this hardware, offering high visual quality without compromising frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the system is capable, but with a caveat. The High preset runs at 72.3 FPS, which is playable. However, the Ultra preset falls short at 52.5 FPS. For 4K gaming, users should stick to High or Medium settings to ensure a consistent experience above the playable threshold.
In summary, this combination is a versatile performer. It excels at 1080p and 1440p with maxed-out settings and remains a viable 4K gaming machine if settings are moderated.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the aggregate benchmark scores, several other CPUs and GPUs would deliver very similar overall performance in this system.
For the CPU, the nearest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent in average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an average score of 25005, which is 0.2% lower than the 7500F's 24964. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-13620H is nearly identical at 24911 (0.2% ahead). Finally, the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, which is 0.4% above the 7500F. Any of these processors would produce near-identical frame rates in game.
For the GPU, the picture is similar. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743, which is 1.5% below the RX 6800 XT's 48477. On the other side, the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 (2.5% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (3% higher). The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, also 3% higher. These GPUs would provide a very similar performance envelope, with the RTX A1000 Mobile being the closest match in terms of raw benchmark score.
It is important to note that these comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific performance. However, they provide a solid indication that swapping the core components for these alternatives would result in a system with a very similar overall performance tier. The combo rank of 1151 out of 3714 would likely remain in the same general area with any of these substitutions.