Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 72 | 82 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 84 | 112 | 128 | 180 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 152 | 174 | 245 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a robust Lockdown Protocol experience across all tested resolutions, with the data showing 60 FPS playability at every preset from 1080p through 4K. The measured frame rates reveal a system that scales predictably with resolution, maintaining high performance even under demanding Ultra settings at lower resolutions. This analysis breaks down the exact figures from the benchmark data, examining settings, hardware roles, and comparable alternatives.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 72 FPS. The data shows Medium runs at 82 FPS average, and Low reaches 116 FPS, but Ultra drops to 54 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. The High preset provides the best visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS line.
For 2560x1440, the system handles Ultra settings at 84 FPS average, making it the most demanding playable preset. The scaling is notable: Medium runs at 128 FPS, High at 112 FPS, and Low at 180 FPS. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra offering the highest fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 114 FPS average, which is the best visual option while remaining well above 60 FPS. The lower presets are progressively faster: High at 152 FPS, Medium at 174 FPS, and Low at 245 FPS. Every preset at this resolution exceeds the playable threshold by a wide margin, with even the most demanding option nearly doubling the target frame rate.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the GPU becomes the limiting factor primarily at 4K Ultra, where the average frame rate drops to 54 FPS. The transition from 2560x1440 Ultra at 84 FPS to 3840x2160 Ultra at 54 FPS represents a 35.7% performance reduction, showing how resolution scaling impacts the graphics card more heavily at the highest settings.
Conversely, the CPU appears to handle the lower resolutions with headroom. At 1920x1080 Low, the system reaches 245 FPS, suggesting the processor is not constrained at this setting. The scaling from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows a 26.5% decrease (245 to 180 FPS), while 1440p Low to 4K Low shows a 35.6% decrease (180 to 116 FPS). This pattern suggests the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as resolution increases.
The data also shows that preset scaling at a fixed resolution is significant. At 4K, moving from Low to Medium reduces average FPS by 29.3% (116 to 82), and from Medium to High by 12.2% (82 to 72). At 1440p, the drop from Low to Medium is 28.9% (180 to 128), and at 1080p it is 29.0% (245 to 174). These consistent reductions indicate that the graphics card is the primary driver across all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient support for the game's workload.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7400F's average benchmark score of 32750. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, just 0.1% below, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 completes the group at 32662, 0.3% lower. These processors would deliver nearly identical in-game performance for Lockdown Protocol, with differences well within typical run-to-run variance.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show similar clustering. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, which is 0.8% higher than the RX 9070's average of 23877. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, 1.2% above, while the GTX TITAN Z scores 23736, 0.6% below. The RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, 1.1% lower. These alternatives would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the RX 9070, meaning users with these cards could expect comparable performance at each resolution and preset combination.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 54, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at this resolution is High, with an average of 72 FPS.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1440p?
A: Ultra settings are playable at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 84 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, while its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707. This represents a 0.1% difference, indicating nearly identical performance levels.
Q: Is the RX 9070 significantly faster than the RTX 2080 SUPER?
A: In average benchmark scores, the RTX 2080 SUPER is actually 1.2% higher at 24170 compared to the RX 9070's 23877. The difference is minimal, suggesting very similar real-world gaming performance.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 Medium is 174, with a minimum of 148 and a maximum of 200. This provides a substantial buffer above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with any preset?
A: Yes, three presets at 3840x2160 exceed 60 FPS: Low at 116 FPS, Medium at 82 FPS, and High at 72 FPS. Only Ultra falls below the threshold at 54 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 245 FPS, Medium runs at 174 FPS with a minimum of 148 and maximum of 200, High reaches 152 FPS, and Ultra maintains 114 FPS. All presets stay well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding option providing nearly double the required frame rate.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Low settings average 180 FPS, Medium runs at 128 FPS with a range of 109 to 147, High delivers 112 FPS, and Ultra achieves 84 FPS. The minimum recorded frame rate of 109 FPS at Medium still exceeds the playable threshold by a wide margin, indicating consistent performance.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates show more variation. Low settings average 116 FPS, Medium runs at 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 and maximum of 95, High reaches 72 FPS, and Ultra drops to 54 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 70 FPS remains playable, but the Ultra preset falls below 60 FPS, making it the only unplayable configuration in the entire dataset.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination ranks 1099 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the 70.4th percentile of all configurations tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 70% of the combinations in the database. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing, where the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's ample rasterization power combine to handle the game's requirements effectively across most settings.
The percentile ranking for the CPU is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all tested CPUs, while the GPU's percentile is 69, outperforming 69% of all tested GPUs. The combo rank of 1099 suggests the pairing works well together, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other in this particular game.
The Verdict
This system can run Lockdown Protocol successfully at all three tested resolutions, with some caveats at the highest settings. At 1920x1080, all presets including Ultra are playable, with the best setting being Ultra at 114 FPS average. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also playable at 84 FPS, making it the best choice for this resolution. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High at 72 FPS, with Low and Medium also exceeding 60 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 54 FPS.
The data clearly shows the system handles the game well for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K users must choose between High settings at 72 FPS or dropping to Medium for 82 FPS. The 70 FPS minimum at 4K Medium indicates stable performance without significant drops. For users prioritizing visual fidelity at 4K, the 54 FPS at Ultra may be acceptable if they prefer quality over frame rate, but the 60 FPS threshold is not met. Overall, this combination delivers a playable experience across the board, with the strongest performance at lower resolutions and high preset levels.