Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 89 | 102 | 144 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 138 | 158 | 223 |
| 1080p Full HD | 141 | 188 | 216 | 289 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX pairing delivers a remarkably consistent high-refresh-rate experience in Lockdown Protocol, regardless of the resolution or preset chosen. Benchmark results show the system never dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold, with average frame rates ranging from 67 FPS at 4K Ultra to 289 FPS at 1080p Low. The data positions this combo in the 514th rank out of 3714 tested configurations, indicating a top-tier setup for this FPS title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data paints a clear picture of a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the CPU and GPU combination produces exceptional headroom. The Low preset delivers an average of 289 FPS, while High settings still achieve 188 FPS. The Medium preset shows a narrower frame-time distribution, with an average of 216 FPS, a minimum of 183 FPS, and a maximum of 248 FPS. Ultra settings reduce the average to 141 FPS, still far above the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains extremely strong. The Low preset averages 223 FPS, while High settings hit 138 FPS. Medium settings produce 158 FPS average, with minimums of 134 FPS and maximums of 182 FPS. At this resolution, Ultra settings still maintain an average of 103 FPS, showing that the RX 7900 XTX has ample bandwidth for higher pixel counts.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to show the expected load increase, but it never falters. The Low preset averages 144 FPS, a figure that many systems cannot reach at 1080p. High settings deliver 89 FPS average, while Medium produces 102 FPS average with a minimum of 87 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration tested, still achieves a 67 FPS average. This indicates the GPU is the primary driver at 4K, as the frame rates scale directly with the rendering load.
Data shows the gap between Low and Ultra presets widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference is 148 FPS (289 vs 141). At 1440p, the difference is 120 FPS (223 vs 103). At 4K, the difference narrows to 77 FPS (144 vs 67). This pattern suggests the CPU becomes less of a bottleneck as resolution increases, shifting the burden entirely to the GPU.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data for the CPU provides context for system-level performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32707, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, just 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, 0.3% lower.
These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming. A user swapping the 7400F for any of these alternatives would see virtually identical frame pacing in Lockdown Protocol, as the game does not appear to stress the CPU beyond its capabilities. The 7400F’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 32 MB shared L3 cache provides sufficient throughput for this FPS, and the benchmark scores confirm parity with the listed rivals.
The GPU’s nearestRivals tell a different story. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has an average benchmark score of 19410, placing it in the 64th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest listed rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which scores 19334, a delta of 0.4%. The NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602, 1% higher. The AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637, 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA TITAN Xp scores 19177, 1.2% lower.
The proximity of these scores is surprising given the architectural differences. The GTX 1060 3 GB and TITAN Xp are older NVIDIA cards, yet their aggregate benchmark scores land near the RX 7900 XTX. However, in the specific context of Lockdown Protocol, the measured FPS data shows the RX 7900 XTX performing at high levels. The aggregate scores do not reflect the modern feature set of the RX 7900 XTX, such as 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 96 ray accelerators, which may not be exercised by the benchmark suite. For this game, the RX 7900 XTX’s raw rasterization power is clearly sufficient, as evidenced by the 4K Ultra average of 67 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
For users targeting 60 FPS as the minimum acceptable performance, the data indicates that the Ultra preset is achievable at every resolution tested. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 141 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that still clears the threshold with significant margin. At 2560x1440, Ultra produces 103 FPS average. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 67 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line.
The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at each resolution. The "best settings" designation points to Ultra in every case, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining playable frame rates. The 4K Ultra figure of 67 FPS is the only scenario where the system is close to the threshold; the 87 FPS minimum recorded at 4K Medium and the 134 FPS minimum at 1440p Medium suggest that frame drops are present but remain well above the playability line.
At 1080p, the Medium preset’s minimum of 183 FPS indicates extremely stable frame delivery. At 1440p, the Medium minimum of 134 FPS is still high enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. The absence of min/max data for other presets means those figures are not available, but the averages alone demonstrate a robust performance envelope. Users with 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays at 1440p would benefit from the High preset (138 FPS average) or Medium (158 FPS average) to stay within the refresh window.
The Verdict
The data answers the core question definitively: yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, and it does so with exceptional headroom. The verdictByResolution field lists all four settings presets as playable at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 141, 103, and 67, respectively.
The 4K Ultra result of 67 FPS is the weakest point in the dataset, but it still exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. This means a user can enable maximum visual quality at 4K and receive a playable experience. At 1440p, the 103 FPS average for Ultra provides a comfortable margin for high-refresh-rate gaming, and the 138 FPS High preset is ideal for 144 Hz displays. At 1080p, the system is overkill for most monitors, as even the Ultra preset reaches 141 FPS, and the Low preset hits 289 FPS, exceeding the refresh rate of all but the most specialized gaming panels.
The comboRankInGame of 514 out of 3714 places this system in the top 14% of all tested configurations for this game. Given that the rankings include many extreme builds, this is a strong showing. The system’s performance is limited only by the monitor’s refresh rate, not the hardware. For competitive play, the Low preset at 1080p (289 FPS) or 1440p (223 FPS) would be optimal. For visual fidelity, the Ultra preset at any resolution is viable.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 148 FPS, and the system reaches 289 FPS at Low. This high average suggests the CPU is managing the game logic efficiently, but the GPU is not yet saturated. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s 12 threads and 4.70 GHz boost clock provide adequate support, but the frame rates are likely GPU-limited even at Low.
At 1440p, the Low preset drops to 223 FPS, a 66 FPS decrease from 1080p. This is a significant drop, indicating the GPU is becoming the primary constraint. The Ultra preset at 1440p (103 FPS) is 38 FPS lower than at 1080p (141 FPS), a 27% reduction. At 4K, the Low preset falls to 144 FPS, and Ultra drops to 67 FPS. The percentage reduction from 1440p to 4K for Ultra is 35%, while from 1080p to 1440p it is 27%. This progressive decline with resolution confirms that the RX 7900 XTX is the limiting factor at higher pixel counts.
The CPU’s role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. At 1080p Low (289 FPS) and 1440p Low (223 FPS), the CPU must feed the GPU with draw calls and game state updates. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s performance, evidenced by its 21765 multi-core score in Cinebench R23, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking. However, the data shows that the CPU’s influence diminishes as resolution rises; at 4K, the GPU’s workload dominates the frame time, and the CPU has ample idle capacity.
The presets also show a CPU/GPU divide. The Medium preset at 1080p produces a 216 FPS average with a 183 FPS minimum. At 1440p Medium, the average is 158 FPS. The step from Medium to High at 1440p costs 20 FPS (158 to 138), while from High to Ultra costs 35 FPS (138 to 103). These non-linear drops are typical of GPU-bound rendering, where higher settings increase pixel shading and texture work. The CPU handles the base simulation, and the GPU scales with visual complexity. For this game, the GPU is the more critical component for 4K and Ultra settings, while the CPU is adequate for all tested scenarios.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings above 60 FPS?
A: Yes. The measured data shows a 67 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average is 289 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. The Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.1% lower, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% higher.
Q: Is the RX 7900 XTX a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: No. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 289 FPS, and at Ultra it maintains 141 FPS. The GPU is capable of driving high frame rates, though the CPU becomes relatively more important at these lower resolutions.
Q: Which preset should I use for a 144 Hz monitor at 2560x1440?
A: The High preset averages 138 FPS, which is close to 144 Hz. The Medium preset averages 158 FPS, which exceeds 144 Hz, providing a better match for a 144 Hz display with headroom.
Q: Does the 4K Medium preset have stable frame times?
A: Yes. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 shows an average of 102 FPS, with a minimum of 87 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. The minimum is well above the 60 FPS threshold.