Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
159 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
74 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
75 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
10.1ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 24,442

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 47 53 75
1440p QHD 54 72 83 117
1080p Full HD 74 99 113 159

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Low 159
1920x1080 Medium 113
1920x1080 Ultra 74
2560x1440 High 72
2560x1440 Low 117
2560x1440 Medium 83
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 75
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Can AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT run Lockdown Protocol? The benchmark data indicates a qualified yes, with the pairing delivering a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but struggling to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K. The combination of the Zen 4-based 6-core processor and the RDNA 2-based graphics card produces a wide performance envelope that scales predictably with resolution and graphical presets, though the GPU becomes the decisive bottleneck at higher pixel counts.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals distinct performance tiers across the three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the pairing operates at the edge of playability. The Low preset delivers an average of 75 FPS, which is the only 4K setting that clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium drops to an average of 53 FPS, with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 61 FPS, indicating noticeable frame pacing issues. High falls further to 47 FPS average, while Ultra bottoms out at 35 FPS average. These numbers show that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises, and even then, frame rates are inconsistent.

Stepping down to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves markedly. The Low preset averages 117 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS, demonstrating solid stability. High averages 72 FPS, which remains playable but with less headroom. Ultra, however, falls to an average of 54 FPS, just below the playability line. The 1440p results suggest that this combo is best suited for High settings, where the visual uplift over Medium is meaningful without sacrificing the 60 FPS target.

At 1920x1080, the combo shows its strongest performance. Low averages 159 FPS, Medium averages 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 130 FPS, High averages 99 FPS, and Ultra averages 74 FPS. Every preset at 1080p stays above the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding Ultra setting retaining a 74 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a drop of 85 FPS, or roughly 53 percent, which indicates that the GPU has enough headroom at this resolution to absorb the added load of higher presets without collapsing.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 75 FPS. This is the only playable option at 4K, and the data shows that attempting Medium drops the average to 53 FPS, a 22 FPS reduction that places it firmly below the playability threshold. For users prioritizing resolution over visual fidelity, Low at 4K is the recommended setting, though the experience will lack the detail of higher presets.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which averages 72 FPS. This preset represents the optimal balance between visual quality and performance, as it remains above the 60 FPS threshold while offering a significant upgrade over Medium’s 83 FPS average. The data shows that Ultra at 1440p averages 54 FPS, which misses the mark, so High is the ceiling for playable settings at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 74 FPS. This is the only resolution where the combo can run the highest preset at playable frame rates. The jump from High’s 99 FPS average to Ultra’s 74 FPS average represents a 25 percent performance hit, but the result stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. For users with 1080p displays, this combo offers the full visual experience without requiring any compromises.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data shows that the GPU is the dominant factor at 3840x2160, where the CPU’s role diminishes as pixel count increases. The drop from Low’s 75 FPS average to Ultra’s 35 FPS average at 4K is a 53 percent reduction, which aligns with the GPU’s workload scaling across presets. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking at this resolution, but the RX 6600 XT’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU, though the GPU remains the primary constraint. The scaling from Low’s 117 FPS average to Ultra’s 54 FPS average is a 54 percent drop, similar to the 4K trend. However, the Ryzen 5 7400F’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, helps maintain higher minimum frame rates in less demanding scenes. The Medium preset’s 70 FPS minimum versus the 4K Medium’s 45 FPS minimum suggests that the CPU has more room to feed the GPU at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role becomes more pronounced, as the GPU is no longer the sole bottleneck. The scaling from Low’s 159 FPS average to Ultra’s 74 FPS average is a 53 percent reduction, but the absolute frame rates are high enough that the Ryzen 5 7400F’s multi-threaded performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765, can keep up with the GPU’s output. The 1080p results show that this combo is balanced at this resolution, with neither component consistently holding back the other.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Only at Low settings, where the average FPS is 75. Medium drops to 53 FPS average, High to 47 FPS, and Ultra to 35 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: High settings, which average 72 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra averages 54 FPS and is not playable.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU matter more for this game at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is still the primary factor, as shown by the 53 percent drop from Low to Ultra, but the CPU’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration and strong single-thread performance help maintain high frame rates across all presets.

Q: Is the RX 6600 XT the bottleneck at 4K?

A: Yes, the GPU’s 8 GB memory capacity and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors at 3840x2160, as evidenced by the steep performance drop from Low to Ultra, which the Ryzen 5 7400F cannot compensate for.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The minimum FPS of 45 was recorded at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. The minimum FPS of 70 was recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, and 96 at 1920x1080 with Medium settings.

Q: How does this combo rank among tested combinations?

A: It ranks 2630 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for Lockdown Protocol performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 7400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32707 with a delta of 0.1 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, scoring 32697 with a delta of 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a delta of -0.2 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a delta of 0.3 percent. These processors would deliver near-identical CPU performance in Lockdown Protocol, meaning the GPU would remain the primary determinant of frame rates.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which scores 24277 with a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Arc A350M, scoring 24647 with a delta of -0.8 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 24236 with a delta of 0.8 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170 with a delta of 1.1 percent. These graphics cards would produce similar FPS results in Lockdown Protocol at the same resolutions and settings, though the RTX 2080 SUPER’s slightly lower average score suggests it may trail the RX 6600 XT by a small margin in this specific title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2630 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the 29th percentile of all tested systems for Lockdown Protocol. This ranking reflects the pairing’s performance profile: strong at 1080p, adequate at 1440p, and limited at 4K. The data shows that the combo sits below the median of tested systems, which aligns with the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The gap between the CPU’s higher percentile and the combo’s lower rank indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions. For users targeting 1080p gaming, this combo delivers a fully playable experience across all presets, but those seeking 4K performance would need to look at higher-tier GPUs to achieve the same level of consistency.