Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

57%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
187 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
88 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
41 FPS
8.6ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 20,733
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 57 62 89
1440p QHD 64 88 101 140
1080p Full HD 88 116 134 187

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 116
1920x1080 Low 187
1920x1080 Medium 134
1920x1080 Ultra 88
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 140
2560x1440 Medium 101
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 89
3840x2160 Medium 62
3840x2160 Ultra 41

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the GeForce RTX 4060 is a mid-range desktop combination sitting in the 74th percentile of CPUs and the 61st percentile of GPUs, and the measured data shows it handles Lockdown Protocol comfortably at 1080p and 1440p while 4K demands significant settings reduction. The game, an FPS released on 2024-03-11, scales clearly with GPU load: at 1920x1080 the pairing averages 87.5 FPS even on Ultra, while at 3840x2160 only Low and Medium presets stay at or above the 60 FPS threshold. Below is a detailed breakdown of what the benchmark data indicates for this hardware combination.

FAQ

Q: Can the Ryzen 5 5600GT + RTX 4060 run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS?

A: Yes. The measured results show the 60 FPS threshold is met at every tested resolution, though not at every preset. At 1920x1080 all four presets clear 60 FPS, topping out at 87.5 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440 all presets also clear it, with Ultra at 64.3 FPS. At 3840x2160 only Low (89.4 FPS) and Medium (62 FPS) qualify; High (56.9 FPS) and Ultra (40.7 FPS) fall short.

Q: What is the best-looking setting combination that still hits 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Medium at 3840x2160, which averages 62 FPS — a narrow margin above the threshold. High at 4K averages 56.9 FPS, so players wanting that preset need to accept dips below 60.

Q: How fast is this setup at 1080p with everything maxed?

A: Ultra at 1920x1080 averages 87.5 FPS, and Medium reaches 134.1 FPS. Low pushes to 187.2 FPS, indicating strong headroom for competitive play at reduced settings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600GT compare to rival CPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 20733 places it within a fraction of a percent of its nearest rivals: Intel Core i5-12490F (avgScore 20802, deltaPct -0.3), Intel Xeon 6325P (20821, -0.4), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20826, -0.4), and AMD EPYC 7J13 (20845, -0.5). In practice these processors deliver near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 rank against nearby GPUs?

A: Its avgBenchmarkScore of 17639 puts it essentially level with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7) in the database's composite metric.

Q: Where does this CPU+GPU combination rank for Lockdown Protocol specifically?

A: It ranks 2004 out of 3714 tested combinations in this game, placing it slightly above the middle of the field.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 5600GT's composite score of 20733 is nearly indistinguishable from several Intel and AMD alternatives. The Intel Core i5-12490F sits 0.3% ahead, the Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U are each roughly 0.4% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 7J13 leads by 0.5%. Any of these processors would produce comparable overall throughput in Lockdown Protocol given how tight the spread is. The 5600GT itself is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 (Cezanne) part on Socket AM4 with a 3.60 base and 4.60 boost clock, DDR4 dual-channel memory support at 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and a launch MSRP of $140.

On the GPU side, the composite benchmark data places the RTX 4060 alongside a group of AMD cards: the Radeon HD 7790 is 0.2% ahead, the Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, the Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% behind, and the Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% behind. In Lockdown Protocol specifically, frame delivery is dominated by the discrete GPU, so combinations built around these graphics solutions would be expected to land in a similar performance band, with the caveat that the RTX 4060's feature set — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores on the AD107 chip — may behave differently in feature-heavy scenarios than raw composite scores suggest.

Best Settings per Resolution

  • 1920x1080 — Ultra: averages 87.5 FPS, clearing 60 with substantial margin. This is the most demanding preset available and it holds comfortably.
  • 2560x1440 — Ultra: averages 64.3 FPS, still above 60 but with limited headroom. High (87.7 FPS) or Medium (101.3 FPS) offer safer margins if frame consistency matters.
  • 3840x2160 — Medium: averages 62 FPS, the highest preset at 4K that meets the threshold. Ultra at 4K drops to 40.7 FPS and High to 56.9 FPS, both below target.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol — with one caveat at 4K. The verdict data is unambiguous at the two most common resolutions: at 1920x1080 every preset from Low through Ultra is playable, with Ultra averaging 87.5 FPS. At 2560x1440 the situation is the same: all four presets clear 60 FPS, and even Ultra holds 64.3 FPS, meaning the full visual package is available at 1440p. At 3840x2160 the picture narrows. Only Low (89.4 FPS) and Medium (62 FPS) are classified as playable, and Medium sits just two frames above the threshold, so the practical 4K experience belongs to the Medium preset. Ultra at 4K, at 40.7 FPS, is not a viable 60 FPS configuration. In short: excellent at 1080p, fully capable at 1440p, and conditional at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data points to Lockdown Protocol being GPU-bound on this configuration at every tested resolution. Moving from 1920x1080 Ultra (87.5 FPS) to 2560x1440 Ultra (64.3 FPS) costs roughly a quarter of the frame rate, and dropping to 3840x2160 Ultra (40.7 FPS) more than halves the 1080p result. Pixel count is the dominant variable, which is characteristic of graphics-limited scenarios rather than processor-limited ones.

The preset scaling reinforces this. At 1080p, going from Ultra to Low raises the average from 87.5 to 187.2 FPS — more than doubling output purely by reducing GPU workload. If the Ryzen 5 5600GT were the bottleneck, lowering settings would produce diminishing returns; instead, settings changes translate almost directly into frame rate. Within a fixed resolution, the gap between Medium and High, and High and Ultra, tracks GPU fill demands consistently at all three resolutions.

That said, the CPU is no slouch for this workload. With a single-thread Passmark score of 3348, a Geekbench single-core result of 1843, and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2438, the 5600GT provides strong per-core throughput, and its max-threads 3DMark score of 5554 alongside the 8-thread score of 4968 shows multithreaded scaling that a modern FPS can exploit. The data simply indicates the GPU is the first ceiling hit, especially at 1440p and 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

Against the full field of tested hardware pairings for Lockdown Protocol, the Ryzen 5 5600GT + RTX 4060 combination ranks 2004 out of 3714 configurations — a position modestly above the median. That placement aligns with the component-level percentiles: the CPU sits in the 74th percentile of all processors in the database while the GPU occupies the 61st percentile of all graphics solutions, so the pairing's composite standing reflects a solid mid-tier CPU paired with a slightly more mainstream GPU. For a game where the graphics processor sets the frame-rate ceiling, the combination's rank tracks the GPU's percentile more closely, and the measured results — full preset access at 1080p and 1440p — are consistent with that upper-middle placement.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All figures below are measured averages for this exact combination.

1920x1080:

| Preset | Avg FPS |

|---|---|

| Low | 187.2 |

| Medium | 134.1 |

| High | 115.8 |

| Ultra | 87.5 |

Every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by wide margins. Even Ultra retains roughly 45% headroom over the target.

2560x1440:

| Preset | Avg FPS |

|---|---|

| Low | 140.4 |

| Medium | 101.3 |

| High | 87.7 |

| Ultra | 64.3 |

The full settings range remains playable. Ultra at 64.3 FPS clears the threshold narrowly; stepping down to High recovers 87.7 FPS.

3840x2160:

| Preset | Avg FPS |

|---|---|

| Low | 89.4 |

| Medium | 62.0 |

| High | 56.9 |

| Ultra | 40.7 |

Low delivers 89.4 FPS, and Medium holds 62 FPS — just above the threshold. High at 56.9 FPS misses the mark by a small margin, while Ultra at 40.7 FPS falls well short. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not captured for these runs, so the averages are the authoritative figures; the tight margin at 4K Medium suggests frame-time variance would be worth monitoring in practice. Across the board, the data shows a combination that is fully measured rather than estimated, and it supports a clear conclusion: play at Ultra through 1440p, drop to Medium at 4K.