Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 59 | 68 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 91 | 105 | 148 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 125 | 143 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a consistently playable experience in Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS that demands both strong CPU throughput and GPU rasterization power. Benchmark data shows this pair ranks in the 1649th position out of 3714 tested combos, placing it comfortably within the top 45% of all configurations evaluated for this title. The measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that scales predictably, with 1080p Ultra hitting 94 FPS average and 4K Ultra still producing 44 FPS, indicating the hardware is far more capable at mainstream resolutions than at extreme pixel counts.
How This Combo Ranks
The 1649th rank out of 3714 combos places this pairing in a solidly mid-upper tier for Lockdown Protocol, but the raw ranking only tells part of the story. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. This asymmetry suggests the RTX 5060 is the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions, a hypothesis supported by the FPS data showing 4K Ultra dropping to 44 FPS average while 1440p Ultra maintains 69 FPS.
Examining the resolution scaling reveals the system’s performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 201 on Low to 94 on Ultra, with Medium producing 143 FPS and High at 125 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, those numbers compress to 148 FPS on Low, 105 on Medium, 91 on High, and 69 on Ultra. The 4K results show a steeper decline: 95 FPS on Low, 68 on Medium, 59 on High, and 44 on Ultra. The gap between 1440p and 4K at Ultra settings—69 versus 44 FPS—represents a 36% performance drop, which is substantial even accounting for the 2.25x pixel count increase.
The 60 FPS playability threshold serves as a useful dividing line. At 1080p and 1440p, every preset from Low to Ultra clears this bar. At 4K, only Low and Medium manage to stay above 60 FPS, with High falling just short at 59 FPS average. This creates an interesting situation where the system is fully playable at 1440p Ultra but requires a settings reduction to enjoy 4K. The data suggests this combo was designed for high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming, with 4K as a secondary consideration.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database show how tightly grouped the 5500X3D’s performance class is. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945 with a delta of +0.2% compared to the 5500X3D’s 37,018 average. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 comes in at 37,093, a -0.2% delta, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938 (+0.2%) and the Intel Core i9-12900T reaches 37,112 (-0.3%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when paired with the same GPU.
The GPU’s nearest rivals present a more varied picture. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26,401 (-0.3%), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 hits 26,421 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary reaches 26,553 (-0.8%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26,011 (+1.2%). The RTX 5060’s average benchmark score is 26,331, placing it within 1.2% of all four rivals. This tight clustering means that swapping the GPU for any of these alternatives would produce nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol, though the RX 6750 XT offers a slight edge while the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary sits marginally below.
For a user considering upgrades or alternative builds, the data implies that the CPU choice matters less than the GPU at higher resolutions. The 5500X3D’s nearest CPU rivals all sit within 0.3% performance, so any of them would pair equally well with the RTX 5060. On the GPU side, the RX 6750 XT’s +1.2% delta suggests it could provide a small FPS boost at 4K, potentially pushing the High preset from 59 FPS to 60 FPS, though this would require testing to confirm.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 and maximum of 78. The High preset falls just short at 59 FPS average, while Low runs at 95 FPS and Ultra drops to 44 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 on average, placing it within 0.3% of the Ryzen 5 5600F (36,945), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093), Core Ultra 5 225 (36,938), and Core i9-12900T (37,112). All four alternatives would deliver effectively identical performance in Lockdown Protocol.
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 1440p with maximum settings?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 produces an average of 69 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four presets at this resolution—Low (148 FPS), Medium (105 FPS), High (91 FPS), and Ultra (69 FPS)—are fully playable.
Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system averages 94 FPS, while at 2560x1440 Ultra it drops to 69 FPS. This 25 FPS reduction represents a 27% performance loss for a 78% increase in pixel count, showing reasonable scaling efficiency.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU more responsible for the 4K performance drop?
A: The RTX 5060 sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile. The steep decline from 1440p Ultra (69 FPS) to 4K Ultra (44 FPS) indicates the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers.
Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for Medium settings across resolutions?
A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 121 FPS with a maximum of 164. At 1440p Medium, the minimum drops to 89 FPS with a maximum of 120. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 57 FPS with a maximum of 78. Only the 4K result approaches the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
This system can absolutely run Lockdown Protocol, and the data shows it excels at 1080p and 1440p while remaining viable at 4K with the right settings. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four presets at 1920x1080—Low at 201 FPS, Medium at 143 FPS, High at 125 FPS, and Ultra at 94 FPS—clear the 60 FPS threshold with significant headroom. The 2560x1440 results are equally strong, with Ultra settings averaging 69 FPS, meaning users can enjoy maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more nuanced. The Low preset runs at 95 FPS and Medium at 68 FPS, both comfortably above 60 FPS. The High preset falls to 59 FPS average, just one frame short of the playability threshold, while Ultra drops to 44 FPS, which is noticeably below the target. The recommended 4K setting is Medium, which provides the best balance of visual quality and performance at 68 FPS average. For users prioritizing 4K, the system is playable but requires accepting Medium quality, while 1440p Ultra offers the full experience without compromise.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of performance across all nine resolution-settings combinations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 201 FPS average, making it ideal for competitive play or high-refresh monitors. Medium settings produce 143 FPS average with a minimum of 121 and maximum of 164, offering a strong balance between visual quality and speed. High settings deliver 125 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 94 FPS average, still far above the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset hits 148 FPS average, Medium reaches 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 and maximum of 120, High achieves 91 FPS, and Ultra settles at 69 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is notable because it maintains the 60 FPS requirement with only 9 FPS of headroom, making it the tightest playable configuration in the dataset. The minimum FPS for 1440p Medium (89) is still well above the threshold, indicating smooth frame delivery.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 95 FPS, Medium runs at 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 and maximum of 78, High reaches 59 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS. The 4K Medium minimum of 57 FPS is the only measured frame rate below 60 across all playable settings, suggesting occasional dips below the threshold during intense scenes. The 4K High result of 59 FPS average is tantalizingly close to playable but officially misses the mark.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that maintains 60 FPS or higher, delivering 94 FPS average. This provides maximum visual quality while still offering substantial performance headroom for demanding scenes. Users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors could also consider High settings at 125 FPS for a smoother experience, but Ultra remains the best choice for image quality.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again takes the top spot with 69 FPS average. This is the recommended configuration for users prioritizing visual fidelity, as it stays above the 60 FPS threshold. The 1440p High preset at 91 FPS provides a safer margin for users who prefer consistent performance over maximum settings, but Ultra is officially playable and delivers the best graphics.
At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best choice, averaging 68 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold, and it significantly outperforms the High preset’s 59 FPS average. The 4K Low preset at 95 FPS offers a faster experience but with reduced visual quality, while Medium provides the optimal balance of aesthetics and performance. Users who insist on High or Ultra at 4K will need to accept frame rates below the playability threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5500X3D and RTX 5060 across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking becomes more relevant, as lower pixel counts reduce GPU load and shift the bottleneck toward processor performance. The 201 FPS result at Low settings suggests the CPU can feed frames rapidly enough to saturate the GPU, while the drop to 94 FPS at Ultra indicates the GPU begins to take on more responsibility as shading complexity increases.
At 1440p, the scaling pattern shows the GPU becoming progressively more important. The transition from 1080p Ultra (94 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (69 FPS) represents a 27% drop, while the CPU’s workload remains relatively constant. This indicates the RTX 5060 is the limiting factor at this resolution, though it still manages to deliver playable frame rates across all presets. The 1440p Medium minimum of 89 FPS demonstrates consistent frame delivery, suggesting the CPU handles the game’s logic and physics without issue.
The 4K results provide the clearest evidence of GPU dominance. The drop from 1440p Ultra (69 FPS) to 4K Ultra (44 FPS) is a 36% reduction, far steeper than the pixel count increase alone would suggest. This points to the RTX 5060’s memory bandwidth and compute resources being stretched at 8.3 million pixels. The CPU’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain minimum frame rates, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s workload at this resolution. The 4K Medium result of 68 FPS, with a minimum of 57, shows the GPU is still capable when settings are moderated, but the CPU’s role diminishes significantly at higher resolutions.