Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 73 | 84 | 118 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 113 | 130 | 183 |
| 1080p Full HD | 116 | 155 | 177 | 241 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, with 4K remaining feasible at reduced settings. The data shows this combination is well-positioned for high-refresh-rate play, though the CPU’s budget positioning becomes evident at lower resolutions. Benchmark results indicate a clear hierarchy: the RTX 3080’s raw rasterization power carries the load at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 5500’s six Zen 3 cores are sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks at 1440p and above.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates. Low settings yield an average of 241 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure across all configurations. Medium settings drop to an average of 177 FPS, with a minimum of 151 FPS and a maximum of 204 FPS. High settings average 155 FPS, while Ultra still holds an average of 116 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 125 FPS drop, indicating that the CPU becomes a limiting factor at this resolution when the GPU is not fully stressed.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very strong. Low settings average 183 FPS, a 58 FPS reduction compared to 1080p Low. Medium settings average 130 FPS, with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS. High settings average 113 FPS, and Ultra averages 85 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 98 FPS, narrower than at 1080p, which suggests the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. Low settings average 118 FPS, which is still playable but 65 FPS lower than 1080p Low. Medium settings average 84 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS. High settings average 73 FPS, and Ultra drops to 55 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 63 FPS, showing that the GPU is now the dominant constraint.
The data reveals a consistent pattern: min and max FPS are only provided for Medium settings across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the range is 151 to 204 FPS, a 53 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the range tightens to 110 to 149 FPS, a 39 FPS spread. At 4K Medium, the range narrows further to 71 to 96 FPS, a 25 FPS spread. This compression indicates that frame pacing becomes more stable as the resolution increases, likely because the GPU workload smooths out CPU-side hitches.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 116 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom, as even the most demanding settings deliver nearly double the playability threshold. The data supports running Ultra without question at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best playable setting, averaging 85 FPS. This is 25 FPS below the 1080p Ultra result but still comfortably above the 60 FPS target. The 85 FPS average suggests there is room to enable additional features or simply enjoy a smooth high-refresh experience on a 144Hz monitor.
For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, averaging 73 FPS. Medium is also playable at 84 FPS, and Low at 118 FPS, but High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra at 4K averages 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and therefore not recommended. The 73 FPS average at High indicates that 4K gaming is viable, but users must accept a compromise in graphics fidelity.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5500 and the RTX 3080 becomes clear when comparing scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiter. The jump from Low to Ultra only costs 125 FPS, but the absolute numbers are high enough that the GPU is rarely fully utilized. The Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread performance, as measured by a 3dmark single-thread score of 836, is adequate but not exceptional, and its multi-thread score of 5411 in the max-threads test suggests it can feed the GPU at lower resolutions.
At 1440p, the balance shifts. The 98 FPS difference between Low and Ultra indicates the GPU is handling more work, but the CPU still keeps pace. The Ryzen 5 5500’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Lockdown Protocol’s demands, and the 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms a majority of processors. The RTX 3080, with its 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs, begins to show its strength here.
At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The 63 FPS difference between Low and Ultra is the smallest across resolutions, and the 55 FPS average at Ultra highlights the RTX 3080’s limits at 4K. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game, but the 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not enough to maintain 60 FPS at Ultra. The CPU’s role diminishes at 4K, as the frame rate is dictated almost entirely by the graphics card.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores provide a useful reference. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 19617, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 5500’s 19593 average. The Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668, 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499, 0.5% lower. The Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723, 0.7% higher. In practice, these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with differences of less than 1% being imperceptible. Users with any of these CPUs should expect similar performance when paired with the RTX 3080.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are more varied. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 0.3% higher than the RTX 3080’s 23172 average. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, 0.4% higher. These deltas are all within 0.4%, meaning any of these GPUs would produce almost identical FPS numbers in Lockdown Protocol. However, this analysis is based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific data, so the RTX 3080’s specific architecture advantages may not be fully captured.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 55, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings at 4K average 73 FPS and are the recommended maximum.
Q: What is the best resolution for a 144Hz monitor?
A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 85 FPS. This is below 144 FPS, so a 144Hz monitor would not be fully saturated. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 116 FPS, which is closer but still short of 144 FPS. Medium settings at 1080p average 177 FPS, which would exceed 144Hz.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 177 at 1920x1080 to 130 at 2560x1440 and then to 84 at 3840x2160. This represents a 53% reduction from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5500 a bottleneck for the RTX 3080?
A: At 1080p, yes, the CPU limits frame rates. The 125 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p indicates the GPU is not fully utilized. At 1440p and 4K, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, as evidenced by the smaller FPS gaps between presets.
Q: What settings provide the most stable frame pacing?
A: The data shows min and max FPS only for Medium settings. At 1080p, the range is 151 to 204 FPS. At 1440p, it is 110 to 149 FPS. At 4K, it is 71 to 96 FPS. The narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates more consistent frame times.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 1065th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 29% of all systems tested for Lockdown Protocol. This percentile is higher than the individual CPU and GPU percentiles, suggesting the pairing is well-matched.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 1065th out of 3714 tested configurations for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 71st percentile of all systems. This is a strong position, especially considering the individual component rankings: the Ryzen 5 5500 sits at the 73rd percentile among CPUs, and the RTX 3080 sits at the 68th percentile among GPUs. The combined ranking of 1065 out of 3714 indicates that this pairing outperforms the majority of systems, and the data supports its capability for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming.
The ranking also contextualizes the 4K performance. While Ultra at 4K is unplayable at 55 FPS, the fact that this combo still ranks in the top 29% suggests that many systems struggle more significantly. The 73 FPS average at 4K High is a respectable result for a CPU that was launched with a $159 MSRP and a GPU that was launched with a $699 MSRP. The data shows a system that is well-suited for competitive play at mainstream resolutions, with enough headroom for visually demanding titles at 1440p.