Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

58%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
78 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
57 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
79 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
9.6ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 17,507
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 49 56 79
1440p QHD 57 76 87 123
1080p Full HD 78 104 119 168

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 104
1920x1080 Low 168
1920x1080 Medium 119
1920x1080 Ultra 78
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 123
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 57
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G sits in a narrow performance band relative to its nearest rivals in the database. Its average benchmark score of 17507 places it within roughly 1% of several comparable processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, 0.1% faster) and the Intel Core 7 150U (17395, 0.6% slower) are effectively interchangeable in multi-threaded workloads. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17614, 0.6% slower) and Intel Core i3-14100T (17648, 0.8% slower) come in slightly ahead, though the differences are within measurement noise. For gaming specifically, the 4600G's single-thread score of 726 in 3DMark and 1919 in Cinebench R23 suggests that any of these rivals would deliver near-identical frame pacing in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the same GPU.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, the database shows a similar clustering. With an average benchmark score of 21035, this GPU sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, scores 21153 (0.6% higher), while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, 1% higher) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, 1.6% higher) are marginally faster. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, 1.6% slower) is the closest below. What this means in practice: swapping the RTX 5050 for any of these alternatives would change average FPS by only a frame or two at most settings. The pairing of the 4600G with the RTX 5050, therefore, represents a balanced mid-range combo that will behave much like any of these adjacent CPU/GPU pairings.

The combined rank of this specific CPU+GPU pairing in Lockdown Protocol is 2293 out of 3714 tested combinations, meaning it sits in the upper-middle tier of all possible builds. The data suggests that if you already own any of the rival CPUs listed above, upgrading to the 4600G would yield no perceptible improvement; similarly, if you have a GPU from the rival list, moving to the RTX 5050 would be a lateral move.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance shifts between the Ryzen 5 4600G and the RTX 5050 across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 168 FPS on Low and 104 FPS on High. The gap between Low and High at 1080p is 64 FPS, which is a 38% reduction. This indicates that the GPU is doing most of the work at this resolution, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed frames up to the 168 FPS ceiling without bottlenecking.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset still manages 123 FPS (a 27% drop from 1080p Low), but High drops to 76 FPS (a 27% drop from 1080p High). The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset is roughly a 27% performance loss, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios. However, at 3840x2160, the picture changes. Low preset yields 79 FPS (a 36% drop from 1440p Low), and High yields 49 FPS (a 36% drop from 1440p High). The larger percentage drop at 4K indicates that the GPU is now the dominant constraint, while the CPU's 12 threads and 8MB of shared L3 cache remain sufficient to keep up.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (726 in 3DMark single-thread) and the GPU's capabilities are more balanced. At 1440p and above, the RTX 5050's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus become the limiting factor, especially on Medium and Ultra presets where texture sizes increase. The Ultra preset at 1080p (78 FPS) versus High at 1080p (104 FPS) shows a 25% penalty, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional effects are disproportionately expensive on this GPU.

FAQ

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1080p with all settings maxed?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 78 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 18 FPS margin. The database shows this is the most demanding preset that remains playable at 1080p.

Q: Is the RTX 5050 strong enough for 1440p gaming in this title?

A: For the most part, yes. At 2560x1440, both High (76 FPS) and Medium (87 FPS) presets stay above 60 FPS, and Low reaches 123 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, averages 57 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. If you want Ultra at 1440p, you would need to look at a higher-tier GPU.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13593 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE, has an average benchmark score of 17614. This works out to a 0.6% difference in the database's aggregated scoring, meaning the 4600G is effectively equivalent in any real workload.

Q: What is the worst-case FPS at 4K?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 37 FPS, which is the lowest recorded value for this configuration. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, averaging 56 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS at 4K, you must use the Low preset, which averages 79 FPS.

Q: Does the GPU's 8 GB memory cause issues at high settings?

A: The data suggests it does at 4K. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 averages 56 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 37 FPS. The large bandwidth (320 GB/s) helps, but the 128-bit bus and 8 GB capacity appear to limit texture fidelity at higher resolutions. At 1080p and 1440p, the memory is sufficient to maintain playable frame rates on all presets.

Q: Should I prioritize a CPU upgrade or GPU upgrade for this game?

A: Based on the measured scaling, the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 1% of each other, so a CPU swap would yield no meaningful gain. The RTX 5050's rivals are also close, but the real bottleneck is the GPU's raw throughput, as evidenced by the 27% FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p and 36% from 1440p to 4K. Upgrading the GPU would be the only path to 4K Ultra.

The Verdict

This system can run Lockdown Protocol, and it does so with varying degrees of comfort depending on your chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the configuration clears the 60 FPS threshold on every preset including Ultra, where it averages 78 FPS. At 2560x1440, you can run High settings at 76 FPS, Medium at 87 FPS, or Low at 123 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 57 FPS. At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 79 FPS; Medium averages 56 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 37 FPS.

The practical advice: if you own a 1080p monitor, you can crank everything and never worry about frame drops. If you have a 1440p display, you'll want to stick to High or Medium to stay above 60 FPS. At 4K, you must accept Low settings, which still delivers a smooth experience, but any visual upgrade will cost you playability. The RTX 5060's 66th percentile ranking among GPUs and the 4600G's 71st percentile among CPUs show this is a balanced mid-range pairing, but the GPU's memory bandwidth limits its 4K performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160:

  • Low: average 79 FPS
  • Medium: average 56 FPS, minimum 48 FPS, maximum 65 FPS
  • High: average 49 FPS
  • Ultra: average 37 FPS

2560x1440:

  • Low: average 123 FPS
  • Medium: average 87 FPS, minimum 74 FPS, maximum 100 FPS
  • High: average 76 FPS
  • Ultra: average 57 FPS

1920x1080:

  • Low: average 168 FPS
  • Medium: average 119 FPS, minimum 101 FPS, maximum 137 FPS
  • High: average 104 FPS
  • Ultra: average 78 FPS

The minimum and maximum values are only recorded for the Medium preset that each resolution, giving a sense of variance: at 1080p Medium, the frame time swings from 101 to 137 FPS, a range of 36 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 26 FPS (74 to 100), and at 4K Medium it's 17 FPS (48 to 65). The narrowing range at higher resolutions suggests the bottleneck shifts consistently toward the GPU, reducing CPU-induced stutter.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 78 FPS. This is the highest possible quality, and the recorded data shows no need to compromise at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, averaging 76 FPS. While the Ultra preset averages 57 FPS and is below the 60 FPS threshold, High offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium (87 FPS) while still maintaining a 16 FPS margin above the playability cutoff.

At 3840x2160, the only preset that clears 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 79 FPS. Medium falls short at 56 FPS, and High and Ultra are far below the threshold. For a 4K display, you will have to trade visual fidelity for frame rate; there is no middle ground that meets the 60 FPS requirement.