Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 50 | 55 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 78 | 89 | 122 |
| 1080p Full HD | 79 | 100 | 121 | 165 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT sits at rank 2359 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. That places this configuration in the 63rd percentile of all recorded system pairings, meaning roughly 63% of tested combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game. The ranking reflects a mid-pack position, not a top-tier contender, but it also shows the combo is far from the bottom of the database. For a game like Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title where smoothness matters more than absolute visual fidelity, this rank suggests the hardware can hold its own, but users should temper expectations for maxed-out settings at higher resolutions.
The percentile data for the individual components reinforces this picture. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 17035. The GPU, meanwhile, lands at the 60th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average score of 17083. The near-identical average scores for both components, within 48 points of each other, indicate a balanced pairing. Neither part dramatically outstrips the other, which is a healthy sign for avoiding bottlenecks. The combo rank of 2359, however, shows that balance does not automatically translate into top-tier gaming performance, particularly in a title that appears to scale heavily with both CPU and GPU resources.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 4K (3840x2160), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, delivering an average of 75.9 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 54.5 FPS, and High drops further to 50.2 FPS, so those are not viable for a smooth experience at this resolution. Ultra is the worst performer at 39.3 FPS, confirming that 4K requires significant graphical compromises with this hardware.
At 1440p (2560x1440), the situation improves markedly. The Ultra preset, the most demanding option, still manages an average of 60.1 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High runs at 77.6 FPS, Medium at 88.5 FPS, and Low at 121.5 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo: it allows the full range of settings, including Ultra, without dipping below the playable threshold.
At 1080p (1920x1080), all four presets clear 60 FPS comfortably. The Ultra preset delivers 78.5 FPS, which is the best visual quality available while still maintaining smooth gameplay. High runs at 100.4 FPS, Medium at 120.9 FPS, and Low at 164.7 FPS. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates over visuals, Low at 1080p provides the highest headroom, but Ultra remains the recommended choice for those who want the best-looking experience without sacrificing playability.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded FPS data shows a clear pattern of GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions, with the CPU taking on a more significant role at lower settings and resolutions. Comparing the scaling from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at Ultra drops from 78.5 to 60.1, a 23% reduction. From 1440p to 4K, the Ultra preset falls from 60.1 to 39.3, a 35% drop. This steep decline at 4K indicates that the RX 7600 XT becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases, since the CPU workload does not scale as dramatically with resolution.
The preset scaling within each resolution provides further insight. At 1080p, the gap between Low (164.7 FPS) and Ultra (78.5 FPS) is substantial, a 52% reduction. At 1440p, the same comparison shows Low at 121.5 FPS and Ultra at 60.1 FPS, a 51% reduction. At 4K, Low runs at 75.9 FPS and Ultra at 39.3 FPS, a 48% reduction. The consistency of this percentage drop across resolutions suggests that graphical settings have a similar relative impact regardless of resolution, pointing to the GPU as the primary driver of these differences.
However, the CPU is not irrelevant. The Ryzen 5 3600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, shows strong multi-threaded performance in synthetic tests, scoring 15045 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 17700 in Passmark multithread. The single-thread score of 2562 in Passmark is also respectable. In an FPS game like Lockdown Protocol, where frame pacing and minimum FPS matter, the CPU's ability to feed the GPU becomes critical at lower resolutions and settings. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 164.7 FPS, while 4K Low drops to 75.9 FPS, indicates that at 1080p the CPU can push frames faster than the GPU can render them, but at 4K the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The data implies that for users aiming for maximum FPS at 1080p, the CPU is doing the heavy lifting; for 4K gaming, the GPU is the sole constraint.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Ryzen 5 3600's performance profile is closely matched by several other processors. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007, a delta of 0.2% above the Ryzen, meaning it would perform nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, a delta of -0.2%, again essentially equivalent. The AMD EPYC 7573X and AMD EPYC 7742, both server-class chips, score 17070 and 16998 respectively, with deltas of -0.2% and 0.2%. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver indistinguishable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which scores 17037, a delta of 0.3% above the RX 7600 XT. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a delta of 0.4%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, a delta of -0.7%, meaning it is slightly faster by about 0.7%. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, a delta of 0.9%. The RTX 3070 is the most interesting comparison: it is a more modern card, but the benchmark data shows it only marginally outperforms the RX 7600 XT in raw average score. In Lockdown Protocol specifically, users with an RTX 3070 would see very similar FPS numbers, within a few percent of this combo. The GTX 690 and HD 7970M are older architectures, but their benchmark scores indicate they would still produce comparable frame rates in this title, which speaks to the RX 7600 XT's position as a mid-range performer rather than a high-end one.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the average FPS values are as follows: Low runs at 75.9 FPS, Medium at 54.5 FPS, High at 50.2 FPS, and Ultra at 39.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 21.4 FPS, a significant jump that suggests the Medium preset introduces graphical effects that heavily tax the GPU. The further drop to High and Ultra shows diminishing returns for visual quality, with each step costing roughly 4 to 11 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the numbers are more encouraging: Low delivers 121.5 FPS, Medium 88.5 FPS, High 77.6 FPS, and Ultra 60.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 33 FPS, which is the largest single-preset jump at this resolution. From Medium to High, the drop is 10.9 FPS, and from High to Ultra, it is 17.5 FPS. The Ultra result of 60.1 FPS is right at the threshold, so any slight variation in gameplay could push it below 60.
At 1920x1080, the FPS values are: Low at 164.7 FPS, Medium at 120.9 FPS, High at 100.4 FPS, and Ultra at 78.5 FPS. The pattern here shows a more linear scaling, with each preset step costing roughly 20 to 44 FPS. The largest drop is from Low to Medium at 43.8 FPS, while the smallest is from High to Ultra at 21.9 FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to keep the GPU fed, and the frame rate differences are primarily driven by GPU rendering load.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with high settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 50.2, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low settings at 4K deliver 75.9 FPS, making that the only playable preset at this resolution.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo if I want to use Ultra settings?
A: Both 1440p and 1080p support Ultra settings. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 60.1 FPS, just above the threshold. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 78.5 FPS, providing more headroom for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-1260P, scores 17007, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, a delta of -0.2%. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU has more influence on frame rates. The gap from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 86.2 FPS (from 164.7 to 78.5), and the CPU can push frames faster than the GPU renders them. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 88.5. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and represents a good balance between visual quality and performance.
Q: Does the RX 7600 XT outperform the RTX 3070 in this game?
A: No. The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's score of 17083. However, this difference is small enough that both cards would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.
The Verdict
The data shows that this combo can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience varies heavily by resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 75.9 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with 54.5, 50.2, and 39.3 FPS respectively. Users who insist on 4K gaming will need to accept minimal graphical quality.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is much more positive. All four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra just barely making it at 60.1 FPS. This resolution offers the full range of settings, allowing users to choose between maximum visual fidelity (Ultra) or higher frame rates (Low at 121.5 FPS). The 1440p Ultra result is borderline, so users who want a consistent 60 FPS with no dips might prefer High settings at 77.6 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the combo excels. Every preset runs well above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 78.5 FPS and Low at 164.7 FPS. This is the resolution where the hardware shows its best balance: the CPU can provide high frame rates, and the GPU can handle the visual load. For competitive play, Low at 1080p offers the highest frame rates, while Ultra provides a visually rich experience without sacrificing playability. The overall verdict is that this PC is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, with 4K available only at reduced settings.