Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 48 | 52 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 75 | 84 | 120 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 100 | 112 | 161 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 presents a clear performance picture for Lockdown Protocol. Across the three tested resolutions, the combination delivers playable frame rates in most configurations, with the primary limitation emerging at 4K Ultra settings. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K requires a settings reduction to maintain smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded frame rates are consistently high across all four quality presets. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 161.3, which is the highest recorded value for this combination in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 111.9 FPS, still a very comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings produce an average of 99.5 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 73.4 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a performance reduction of roughly 54%, but every preset at this resolution clears the playable threshold with substantial headroom.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but begin to show the expected scaling impact. Low settings deliver an average of 120 FPS, which is a 25.6% reduction compared to the same preset at 1080p. Medium settings average 83.5 FPS, while High settings average 75 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 56.8 FPS, which falls just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This means that at 1440p, the three lower presets are fully playable, while Ultra requires either a resolution drop or settings adjustment to maintain consistent smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the performance ceiling becomes more restrictive. Low settings produce an average of 75.3 FPS, which is still comfortably playable. Medium settings drop to 51.9 FPS, and High settings average 48.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 35.8 FPS, which is well below the playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is approximately 52%, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint when pushing 4K resolutions with high visual fidelity.
The measured FPS data does not include minimum or maximum frame time values, so the analysis relies on average FPS as the primary metric. The absence of min and max figures means that frame pacing consistency cannot be directly assessed from this dataset, but the average values provide a reliable indication of overall performance headroom.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is identified as the best playable setting.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best setting, with an average of 73.4 FPS. This is the highest quality preset available in the test suite, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by 13.4 FPS. All four presets at this resolution are playable, but Ultra offers the maximum visual quality while retaining a smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best setting, with an average of 75 FPS. This provides 15 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. The Medium preset also averages 83.5 FPS, which is technically higher, but High offers better visual quality while still maintaining a comfortable margin. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 56.8 FPS, so it is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 75.3 FPS. This is the best setting at 4K because it is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 51.9 FPS, which is 8.1 FPS below the threshold, and High and Ultra are progressively further behind.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 73.4 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1440p?
A: The High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 75 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 56.8 FPS and falls below the threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 75.3 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 51.9, 48.4, and 35.8 FPS respectively.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: The reduction varies by preset. Low settings drop from 161.3 FPS at 1080p to 120 FPS at 1440p, a 25.6% decrease. High settings drop from 99.5 FPS to 75 FPS, a 24.6% decrease. Ultra settings drop from 73.4 FPS to 56.8 FPS, a 22.6% decrease.
Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, Low settings average 75.3 FPS while Ultra settings average 35.8 FPS. This represents a performance gap of 39.5 FPS, meaning Ultra delivers roughly 52% lower average frame rate than Low.
Q: Does the system ever drop below the playable threshold at 1080p?
A: Based on the recorded average FPS values, no. At 1920x1080, the lowest average is 73.4 FPS on Ultra settings, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold. The dataset does not include minimum FPS values, so transient dips cannot be ruled out, but the averages indicate consistent playability.
The Verdict
The recorded data confirms that this combination can run Lockdown Protocol at all three tested resolutions, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution.
At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on every preset. The Ultra preset averages 73.4 FPS, providing a solid margin for smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. This is the strongest performance tier for this hardware, with all settings options viable.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High, Medium, and Low presets. The High preset averages 75 FPS, which is the best balance of quality and performance at this resolution. The Ultra preset falls short at 56.8 FPS, so users targeting 1440p should stick with High or lower settings to maintain consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, with an average of 75.3 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 51.9, 48.4, and 35.8 FPS respectively. For 4K gaming, the visual quality must be reduced significantly to achieve smooth performance.
Overall, the verdict is positive for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K limited to low visual fidelity. The data indicates that this hardware pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and solid 1440p gameplay, while 4K enthusiasts will need to compromise on settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have nearby rivals in the database that would produce similar performance characteristics.
For the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Core i5-11400, AMD EPYC 7573X, and AMD EPYC 7742. The Intel Core i7-1260P posts an average benchmark score of 17007, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 3600's average of 17035. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17070, also 0.2% higher, while the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998, 0.2% lower. These deltas are minimal, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol.
For the AMD Radeon RX 7600, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, AMD Radeon Pro 560X, AMD Radeon 680M, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti. The RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199 in the GPU benchmark suite, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600's average of 15171. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082, 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, 0.7% higher. The GTX 660 Ti scores 15063, 0.7% lower. These small differences suggest that swapping the GPU for any of these alternatives would result in very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with the Radeon 680M being the closest competitor in terms of overall GPU compute performance.
When considering a complete system swap, a combination featuring the Intel Core i5-11400 with the RTX 3050 OEM would behave nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 3600 with the RX 7600. The CPU delta is 0.2% and the GPU delta is 0.2%, so the measured FPS values would be within a small margin of error. Similarly, pairing the Ryzen 5 3600 with a Radeon 680M would provide slightly higher GPU-side performance, potentially pushing 4K Medium settings closer to the 60 FPS threshold, though the 0.7% delta is unlikely to change the overall verdict.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks at position 2522 out of 3714 total combinations. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, specifically around the 68th percentile of the database. The ranking reflects the overall performance across all tested resolutions and settings, not just the 60 FPS threshold.
The rank of 2522 out of 3714 indicates that a majority of tested hardware combinations deliver higher average frame rates in this game. This is consistent with the measured data, which shows that the system struggles at 4K Ultra and 1440p Ultra, both of which fall below the playable threshold. However, the ranking does not tell the full story: the system performs very well at 1080p and 1440p with moderate settings, which are the most common gaming configurations.
The percentile position suggests that while this combo is not a top-tier performer, it is far from the bottom of the database. The 68th percentile ranking means that roughly 32% of tested combinations perform worse, which aligns with the fact that this system can handle 1080p Ultra and 1440p High without issues. The primary factor holding back the ranking is the 4K performance, where only Low settings are playable. Hardware combinations with more powerful GPUs would rank higher due to their ability to maintain 60 FPS at 4K with higher quality presets.
For context, the database includes 3714 combinations, so a rank of 2522 means this system sits in the upper half by a narrow margin. The gap to the next tier of performance is not enormous, as the nearest rival GPU deltas are within 0.7%, but the CPU and GPU combination as a whole is constrained by the RX 7600's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus, which limit high-resolution texture performance. The data confirms that this is a solid mainstream gaming setup, but not one that will top leaderboards for demanding titles at maximum settings.