Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

61%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
164 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
76 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
120 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
55 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
81 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
9.5ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 21,484
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 19,765

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 48 57 81
1440p QHD 55 76 89 120
1080p Full HD 76 105 117 164

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 105
1920x1080 Low 164
1920x1080 Medium 117
1920x1080 Ultra 76
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 120
2560x1440 Medium 89
2560x1440 Ultra 55
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 81
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Can AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT run Lockdown Protocol? The recorded data indicates a clear yes for most configurations, though the upper limits of 4K resolution demand a significant compromise in visual fidelity. This pairing delivers a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p across most presets, with the only notable struggles appearing at 4K Ultra settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database’s playable threshold is set at 60 frames per second. For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above this mark defines the best settings.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the only preset that clears the 60 FPS bar is Low, with an average of 81.2 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 57 FPS, which falls below the threshold, and High sits at 47.6 FPS. Ultra is the least viable option here, averaging just 37.3 FPS. Therefore, the best settings for 4K are Low, where the frame rate is high enough to keep the action fluid, though visual details will be reduced.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves considerably. The High preset achieves an average of 75.7 FPS, making it the optimal choice for this resolution. Medium runs at 89.1 FPS, and Low reaches 119.5 FPS, but High offers the best visual fidelity while still comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset, however, falls short at 54.7 FPS, meaning it is not recommended for playable frame rates at this resolution.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the hardware has ample headroom. The Ultra preset, the most demanding option, averages 76.3 FPS, which clears the threshold. This makes Ultra the best setting at 1080p, allowing for maximum visual quality without sacrificing fluidity. High runs at 104.5 FPS, Medium at 116.6 FPS, and Low at 163.7 FPS, all of which are excellent, but Ultra is the clear winner for the best balance of image quality and performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the workload shifts between the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT as resolution changes. The scaling of frame rates across resolutions indicates which component is the primary bottleneck in different scenarios.

Looking at the High preset, the average FPS drops from 104.5 at 1080p to 75.7 at 1440p, a reduction of roughly 28%. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average falls further to 47.6 FPS, a 37% drop. This pattern shows a consistent and significant performance penalty as pixel count increases, which points to the GPU being the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The RX 6650 XT is working progressively harder to render more pixels, and its performance ceiling is being reached before the CPU becomes a constraint.

At the Low preset, the frame rates are much higher, with 163.7 FPS at 1080p and 119.5 FPS at 1440p. The gap between these two is smaller in percentage terms than at High settings. This suggests that at lower graphical loads, the CPU has a more prominent role in determining the maximum frame rate. The Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is able to feed the GPU enough data to reach these high numbers, but it is still the component that limits the absolute peak FPS. At 4K Low, the average is 81.2 FPS, which is a substantial drop from 1440p, indicating that the GPU again becomes the primary bottleneck as the resolution increases, even with low detail settings.

The data indicates a classic balance. At 1080p, the system is often CPU-bound at lower presets, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. At 4K, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor, as its raw rendering power is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at high detail levels. At 1440p, the workload is more balanced, with the GPU carrying most of the load but the CPU still being relevant for high-refresh-rate scenarios.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database’s nearest rival lists provide context for how this specific CPU and GPU combo compares to other hardware. These alternatives are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not specific in-game performance, but they offer a baseline for expected behavior.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, the closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are a mix of mobile and server parts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has an average score 0.2% higher, making it a near-identical performer in synthetic tests. The Intel Core i9-11900H is also close, with a score 0.5% higher. On the other side, the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 0.7% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 1.2% lower. These deltas are small, meaning that in a gaming scenario, a system with any of these CPUs would likely produce very similar frame rates when paired with the same GPU. The Ryzen 5 2600 is an older desktop part, but its performance profile is still competitive with these newer, more varied chips.

For the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, the nearest rivals are all professional or workstation GPUs, which is an interesting comparison. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 0.6% lower, while the AMD FirePro D300 scores 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro W7000 is 0.7% lower, and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 is 0.8% higher. These workstation cards are not typically used for gaming, but their raw compute and rendering performance is in the same ballpark as the RX 6650 XT. In practice, a gamer would expect the RX 6650 XT to perform better in a game like Lockdown Protocol due to driver optimizations and feature support, but the underlying throughput is comparable.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The answer is a definitive yes for the majority of use cases, based on the recorded measurements.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable. The verdict data shows that all presets, including Ultra, are playable. The best experience is at Ultra settings, which yields an average of 76.3 FPS, ensuring a smooth and visually rich experience. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, offering the full range of graphical options.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. The playable settings include High, Medium, and Low. The best choice is High, with an average of 75.7 FPS, which provides a great balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra is not recommended here, as it drops below the 60 FPS threshold, but the High preset delivers a very solid gaming experience.

At 3840x2160, the system is limited. The only playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 81.2 FPS. This means that to play at 4K, users must sacrifice most graphical details. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS target. This combination is not suited for high-detail 4K gaming, but it can handle 4K at lower settings for those who prioritize resolution over visual effects.

In summary, the Ryzen 5 2600 and RX 6650 XT pairing is a strong performer for 1080p and a capable one for 1440p. It can run Lockdown Protocol smoothly at high settings on those resolutions. 4K is possible only at the lowest preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination. The data shows a clear progression of performance scaling.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 81.2 FPS, Medium at 57 FPS, High at 47.6 FPS, and Ultra at 37.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 24.2 FPS, which is a significant step down in performance for a modest increase in visual quality. The gap from High to Ultra is smaller at 10.3 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 119.5 FPS, Medium at 89.1 FPS, High at 75.7 FPS, and Ultra at 54.7 FPS. The scaling here is more gradual, with each preset step costing roughly 15 to 20 FPS. This shows a balanced workload where the GPU is still the main driver, but the CPU is not holding things back as much as at lower resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the averages are: Low at 163.7 FPS, Medium at 116.6 FPS, High at 104.5 FPS, and Ultra at 76.3 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium is a substantial 47.1 FPS drop, which indicates that the CPU is likely the limiting factor at the Low preset, preventing the GPU from reaching even higher numbers. The steps from Medium to High and High to Ultra are more consistent at 12.1 and 28.2 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset still maintains a playable average, but it is the first setting that brings the frame rate down to a level where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT against all other tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. The combo ranks 2426 out of 3714 total combinations.

This places the system in the lower-middle portion of the field. It sits above roughly 35% of all tested configurations, which means there is a substantial number of more powerful systems that will deliver higher frame rates. However, it also means that this combo outperforms a majority of the tested hardware pool. For a system built around a 2018 CPU and a 2022 GPU, this ranking is respectable. It is not a top-tier setup, but it is far from being an outlier at the bottom. The rank reflects the balance of the components, which are well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not for pushing 4K or extreme refresh rates. This position in the rankings confirms that the system is a solid mid-range performer, capable of handling mainstream gaming demands without being a flagship solution.