Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
330 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
158 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
242 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
115 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
73 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 70,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 73 74 123 148
1440p QHD 115 122 192 242
1080p Full HD 158 164 266 330

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 330
1920x1080 Medium 266
1920x1080 Ultra 158
2560x1440 High 122
2560x1440 Low 242
2560x1440 Medium 192
2560x1440 Ultra 115
3840x2160 High 74
3840x2160 Low 148
3840x2160 Medium 123
3840x2160 Ultra 73

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a thoroughly convincing performance profile for Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. The measured data shows this combination is not merely capable of running the game, but does so with substantial headroom at every resolution tested. The benchmark results indicate a system that consistently exceeds the playable threshold of 60 FPS, even when pushing the graphical preset to its maximum setting.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The FPS data for this combination reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional fluidity. With the Low preset, the average frame rate reaches 330.3 FPS, which is a staggeringly high figure that leaves enormous headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 265.9 FPS, while the High preset produces 164.3 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset still maintains an impressive 158.3 FPS average. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is almost entirely unburdened by the game's visual demands.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but begins to show more differentiation between settings. The Low preset yields an average of 241.8 FPS, which is still exceedingly high. Medium settings produce 192.1 FPS, and High delivers 122.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p achieves 115 FPS average, indicating that even the most visually intensive configuration at this resolution stays well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable reduction in frame rates, but the system's raw capability ensures that all presets remain highly playable.

At 3840x2160, or 4K resolution, the performance landscape changes more dramatically. The Low preset still manages a strong 147.6 FPS average, while Medium produces 122.7 FPS. However, the High preset drops to 74.1 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 72.8 FPS. While these 4K figures are lower than at other resolutions, they still clear the 60 FPS threshold with a comfortable margin. The data shows a significant leap in performance between the Medium and High presets at 4K, suggesting that the higher settings impose a considerably heavier load on the GPU.

It is notably the provided data only includes average FPS figures without minimum or maximum values. This means the analysis cannot capture potential frame time spikes or stutters, but the consistently high averages across all configurations strongly suggest a stable and smooth gameplay experience. The lowest recorded average across the entire test matrix is 72.8 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still a robust figure for a game of this type.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the performance scaling between resolutions and presets reveals the respective roles of the CPU and GPU in this configuration. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a high-end desktop processor with 20 cores and 20 threads, and its benchmark scores place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, meanwhile, sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, according to the data. This disparity in relative strength suggests that the CPU is significantly overqualified for the task of running Inside.

The data confirms this hypothesis. At 1080p Low, the system produces 330.3 FPS, which is an extraordinarily high frame rate that likely approaches the engine's ceiling or the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls. When the resolution increases to 1440p, the Low preset still delivers 241.8 FPS, indicating that the CPU remains the primary limiter at lower graphical loads. The fact that the frame rate drops by roughly 27% when moving from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings points to a combination of CPU and GPU constraints, but the sheer magnitude of the FPS numbers suggests the CPU is doing most of the heavy lifting in these scenarios.

As the graphical preset increases, the GPU becomes more prominent in determining performance. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 72.8 FPS, which is a substantial reduction from the 147.6 FPS at 4K Low. This scaling indicates that the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game, but the rendering workload at 4K with maxed settings clearly strains the graphics card.

The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the system is largely CPU-bound, while at 4K, the GPU takes over as the dominant constraint. This is a classic pattern for a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The Core Ultra 7 265K's powerful multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. However, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance becomes the limiting factor when the rendering resolution increases.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: this system can handle the Ultra preset at all three tested resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 158.3 FPS. This is the best possible settings configuration, and the system delivers nearly triple the playable threshold. There is no reason to compromise on visual quality at this resolution. The High preset produces 164.3 FPS, which is marginally higher, but the Ultra preset offers the full graphical experience while still maintaining an exceptionally smooth frame rate.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again emerges as the recommended choice, with an average of 115 FPS. This is comfortably above 60 FPS, providing a fluid experience on high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The gap between High (122.1 FPS) and Ultra (115 FPS) is relatively small, making the Ultra preset the obvious choice for users prioritizing visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is still viable, with an average of 72.8 FPS. While this is the lowest figure across the test matrix, it remains above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset offers a slightly higher 74.1 FPS, but the difference is negligible. For 4K gaming, the Ultra preset is the best settings selection, delivering the highest visual quality while still maintaining a playable frame rate. The data shows that all four presets at 4K clear the 60 FPS bar, with even the Low preset reaching 147.6 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 72.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate this combination achieves?

A: The highest measured average is 330.3 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The system also exceeds 300 FPS at this resolution on Medium settings, reaching 265.9 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. It is 1% faster than the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, while being 0.2% slower than the Intel Xeon 6511P.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the system is more CPU-bound at 1080p, given the extremely high frame rates. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system achieves 158.3 FPS, which indicates the RTX 4060 is sufficiently powerful for this resolution.

Q: What is the difference in performance between High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 122.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 115 FPS. This represents a 5.8% reduction in frame rate for the highest settings.

Q: How does the GPU rank compared to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666, a difference of just 0.2%.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined performance of this CPU and GPU places it at rank 1863 out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This puts the system in the 50th percentile of all combos tested for this specific game. Given the game's relatively modest graphical requirements as a 2016 puzzle platformer, this ranking reflects the fact that many high-end systems can run it exceptionally well. The rank of 1863 indicates that there are 1862 other combinations that perform better in this game, but there are also 1853 combinations that perform worse. This mid-tier ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU's high percentile ranking of 94, but it underscores the fact that Inside is not a demanding title, and even mid-range GPUs can achieve high frame rates. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile ranking is more consistent with the overall combo rank, suggesting that the GPU is the primary differentiator in this game's performance across various system configurations.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: this PC can run Inside at all tested resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 158.3 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 115 FPS, providing a smooth experience on high-resolution monitors. Even at 3840x2160, the most demanding configuration, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 72.8 FPS, clearing the playability bar by a healthy margin. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) are playable at every resolution tested. For users with a 60 Hz display, this system offers complete freedom to enable the highest visual settings. For those with high-refresh-rate monitors, the system can deliver exceptionally high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, making it a versatile choice for competitive or fast-paced gameplay.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components provides context for how other hardware might behave in this system. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's closest competitor is the Intel Xeon 6511P, which has an average benchmark score of 71051, just 0.2% lower than the Core Ultra 7's 70879. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71370, which is 0.7% higher. On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, placing it 1% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, 1.3% lower. These small deltas mean that swapping the Core Ultra 7 for any of these processors would result in nearly identical gaming performance in Inside.

For the GPU, the RTX 4060's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666 versus the RTX 4060's 17639, a difference of only 0.2%. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, which is 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 460 rounds out the list with a score of 17509, 0.7% lower. These extremely close benchmark scores suggest that any of these GPUs would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Inside. A system built with any of these rival CPUs paired with any of these rival GPUs would likely fall within a few FPS of the measured performance of the Core Ultra 7 265K and RTX 4060 combination. The data indicates that the performance headroom in this game is so large that even significantly weaker hardware could run it smoothly, making these alternatives excellent choices for users seeking similar gameplay experiences.