Inside

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is an overwhelmingly capable combination for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that places minimal strain on modern hardware. The benchmark data, which is measured rather than estimated, shows this system exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. From the modest 1080p Low setting to the demanding 4K Ultra preset, the frame rates are consistently high, often by a significant margin. This analysis breaks down the exact performance figures, answers common questions, compares the hardware to nearby alternatives, and provides a clear verdict on the best settings for a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a system that is never challenged by Inside, even at the highest settings. The benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, with the RTX 4060 providing ample headroom for the game's relatively simple 2D side-scrolling visuals.

At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high across all settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 333 FPS, which is a massive figure that indicates the CPU and GPU are nowhere near their limits. Moving to Medium reduces the average to 266 FPS, with a minimum of 226 FPS and a maximum of 306 FPS, showing a consistent frame delivery. The High preset still produces an average of 167 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra setting maintains an average of 159 FPS. Even at its lowest point, this resolution delivers over 2.5 times the 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, the system continues to perform admirably. The Low preset yields an average of 239 FPS. The Medium setting provides a robust average of 192 FPS, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 220 FPS. The High preset drops the average to 120 FPS, and the Ultra setting still manages a very smooth 114 FPS average. This resolution is clearly well within the comfortable operating range of this hardware, with even the most demanding settings offering double the required frame rate.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the performance remains playable at every preset. The Low setting produces an average of 150 FPS. The Medium preset, which has the only min/max data at this resolution, shows an average of 120 FPS, with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS. This indicates a stable frame pacing even at 4K. The High setting averages 75 FPS, and the Ultra setting, the most demanding configuration, still achieves an average of 72 FPS. While this is the lowest average recorded, it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, confirming that 4K gaming is not only possible but also smooth with this combination.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, the data confirms it can. At 3840x2160, the system achieves an average of 72 FPS on the Ultra preset, 75 FPS on High, 120 FPS on Medium, and 150 FPS on Low. All settings at this resolution are above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination can achieve?

A: The highest recorded average is 333 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This shows the system has enormous headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors at lower resolutions.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 a bottleneck for the Core Ultra 7 265 in this game?

A: The data suggests not in any meaningful way. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution, and the system maintains high averages even at 4K. The performance is so high that any potential bottleneck is irrelevant for achieving a smooth experience.

Q: How stable is the frame rate at the most demanding setting?

A: At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS is 72, but the minimum FPS data is not listed. However, at 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 102 FPS and the maximum is 138 FPS, indicating a stable frame delivery. The pattern suggests that the Ultra preset at 4K remains stable enough for play.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the High and Ultra presets?

A: Yes, the difference is measurable. At 1920x1080, the average drops from 167 FPS on High to 159 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, it drops from 120 FPS to 114 FPS. At 3840x2160, the drop is from 75 FPS to 72 FPS. The cost is relatively small, making Ultra a viable choice.

Q: What is the performance gap between the lowest and highest presets at 1080p?

A: The average frame rate on Low is 333 FPS, while on Ultra it is 159 FPS. This represents a significant 174 FPS difference, showing that the preset has a substantial impact, but both are far above any playability concern.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data places the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 in a specific performance tier, with its average benchmark score of 64640. The nearest rivals, based on average score, are all AMD EPYC server processors. The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average score of 64823, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265. The AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7% higher with a score of 65104. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a close match with a score of 64438, just 0.3% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.7% lower with a score of 64202. For a gaming-focused build, the Core Ultra 7 265F would behave nearly identically, as it is essentially the same chip without integrated graphics. The EPYC processors are server parts and would not be typical choices for a gaming PC, but their similar benchmark scores indicate a comparable level of compute capability.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are a mix of older and integrated graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics scores 17588, just 0.3% lower, indicating that a modern high-end iGPU can get close to this dedicated card's performance in general benchmarks. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% lower, respectively, with scores of 17551 and 17509. In the context of Inside, any of these alternatives would likely also deliver playable frame rates, but the RTX 4060's dedicated hardware and driver support make it the more robust choice for a wider range of games.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The answer is a definitive yes, with substantial performance to spare. The verdict data is clear: at all three tested resolutions, every single preset is considered playable, meaning it achieves an average FPS above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system clears the 60 FPS bar with all settings. The best preset is Ultra, which produces an average of 72 FPS. This is a remarkable result, as it means you can experience the game at its highest visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate on a 4K display.

At 2560x1440, the performance is even more comfortable. The best preset is Ultra, which achieves an average of 114 FPS. This not only clears the 60 FPS target but also provides enough headroom for a high refresh rate 1440p monitor.

At 1920x1080, the system is in its element. The best preset is Ultra, which delivers an average of 159 FPS. This is far beyond the playable threshold and will make full use of any 1080p high-refresh-rate display, providing an incredibly smooth experience.

In summary, this combination does not just run Inside; it dominates it. You can confidently select the highest settings at any resolution and expect a frame rate that is at least 20% above the playability threshold, and often much higher.

Best Settings per Resolution

For players seeking the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance, the data points to the highest preset that maintains a 60 FPS average. In every case, this is the Ultra preset.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which yields an average of 72 FPS. This is the best choice for 4K, as it offers the maximum visual quality while still providing a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the recommended setting, achieving an average of 114 FPS. This provides a high-quality image with a very high frame rate, making it ideal for 1440p gaming.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the top choice, with an average of 159 FPS. This setting offers the full visual experience of the game while delivering a frame rate that is more than sufficient for any 1080p monitor.

In short, there is no need to compromise on settings with this hardware. The Ultra preset is the best choice at every resolution, as it is the most demanding option that remains at or above the 60 FPS target.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks at 1863 out of 3716 tested combos for this game. This puts it in the top half of all systems tested, reflecting its strong performance in Inside.

This ranking is influenced by the fact that Inside is not a demanding title, and the high frame rates achieved by this combo are common among many modern systems. The rank of 1863 indicates that while this system is very capable, there are a significant number of other combos that also achieve very high frame rates in this game. The data shows the system is not in the top tier, but its performance is more than sufficient for a great experience. The high CPU percentile of 93 and GPU percentile of 61 highlight that the processor is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a solid mid-range option, and their combined effort is more than enough for this specific game.