Inside

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a remarkably strong performance profile for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. Benchmark data shows the pairing handles the game with significant headroom across most settings, though 4K Ultra presents a notable challenge. The measured frame rates reveal a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU's substantial single-thread and multi-thread capabilities ensure it never becomes a limiting factor. This analysis examines the specific performance metrics, comparative rankings, and optimal configuration strategies based solely on the provided data.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this game with this hardware?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, the best playable configuration at 3840x2160 is Medium settings, which achieves an average of 87 FPS. At both 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is playable, with average frame rates of 82 FPS and 114 FPS respectively.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 a high-performing CPU relative to other processors?

A: Yes, the CPU sits in the 90th percentile among all tested CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 48,995, placing it in close competition with processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49,228, a 0.5% difference) and the Intel Core i5-14600K (48,618, a 0.8% difference).

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 20,556, which places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582, a -0.1% difference).

Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but not on the highest settings. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 108 FPS and the Medium preset averages 87 FPS, both clearing the 60 FPS threshold. However, the High preset averages 54 FPS and Ultra averages 52 FPS, which fall below the playable threshold.

Q: Is there a significant performance drop between 1440p and 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows a substantial drop. At Medium settings, the average frame rate falls from 138 FPS at 2560x1440 to 87 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 51 FPS. Similarly, at High settings, performance drops from 86 FPS to 54 FPS.

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for this specific game?

A: The combo ranks 2983 out of 3716 total tested combinations. This places it in the top 20% of all tested configurations, indicating it is a strong performer for Inside despite not being in the absolute top tier.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the Intel Arc B570. At 1920x1080, the system is likely CPU-bound or balanced, as even the Ultra preset delivers 114 FPS on average. The jump from Low (240 FPS) to Ultra (114 FPS) at this resolution shows the GPU is still the primary driver of graphical settings, but the CPU provides ample headroom to push high frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The Ultra preset still maintains an average of 82 FPS, while Low hits 172 FPS. This 90 FPS spread between the lowest and highest settings indicates the GPU is handling the increased pixel load effectively, but the CPU continues to feed it sufficient data. The transition from 1440p to 4K is where the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. At 3840x2160, the High preset drops to 54 FPS, and Ultra falls to 52 FPS. The GPU's raw throughput is simply insufficient for these demanding configurations. The Medium preset at 4K (87 FPS) versus High (54 FPS) shows a steep 33 FPS penalty for that single settings tier, underscoring how much pixel count stresses the Arc B570.

The data suggests the CPU's role is mostly passive for this game. Its 14 cores and 14 threads, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, are more than adequate for Inside's physics and logic. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,394 and multi-thread score of 38,706 indicate strong, consistent performance that won't cause frame pacing issues. The GPU, with its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, handles the graphical workload. The scaling from 1080p Ultra (114 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (82 FPS) to 4K Ultra (52 FPS) shows a near-linear decline, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. This combo is balanced enough for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K requires careful settings management.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc B570 achieves a rank of 2983 out of 3716 tested configurations for Inside. This position, roughly in the 80th percentile, reflects a system that is capable but not exceptional for this specific title. The rank is likely held back by the GPU's performance at 4K, where it struggles to maintain high frame rates on demanding presets. The CPU's 90th percentile standing is strong, but the GPU's 65th percentile ranking pulls the overall combo down.

To contextualize this rank, consider the individual component standings. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, has an average score just 0.5% higher. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, is only 0.1% faster. This means the combo's performance is tightly clustered with several other mid-range to high-end configurations. The rank of 2983 suggests that many other tested systems, likely with more powerful GPUs, outpace this pairing at 4K. However, for a puzzle platformer like Inside, which doesn't demand high-end graphics hardware, this rank is more than sufficient for a smooth experience at most settings.

The data indicates that the combo's ranking is a tale of two components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a solid mid-range option, sitting in the 65th percentile. When combined, the system performs admirably at 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU's strengths can shine. At 4K, the GPU's limitations become apparent, dragging the overall rank down. This is a classic case of a well-matched mid-range system that excels at mainstream resolutions but hits a wall at the extreme end of the resolution spectrum.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is flanked by several processors with nearly identical average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (average score 49,196) is just 0.4% slower, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49,228) is 0.5% slower. On the other side, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698) is 0.6% faster, and the Intel Core i5-14600K (48,618) is 0.8% faster. These rivals would deliver virtually indistinguishable performance in Inside, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the Arc B570 would yield similar frame rates. The choice between them would come down to other factors like platform features or power efficiency, not gaming performance in this title.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals are equally close in performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) is 0.1% faster, and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582) is 0.1% slower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662) is 0.5% slower, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480) is 0.4% faster. For Inside, these GPUs would produce nearly identical results. The Arc A750 is particularly interesting as a direct competitor from the same manufacturer, offering a similar experience. Users with any of these GPUs would see the same pattern: excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring reduced settings.

This tight clustering of rivals means that the tested combo is representative of a broad performance tier. If a user has a system with an RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750, they can expect the same playable settings and frame rates described in this analysis. The 4K High preset (54 FPS) and Ultra preset (52 FPS) would remain just below the 60 FPS threshold across all these configurations. The 1440p Ultra preset (82 FPS) would be consistently achievable. This data provides a reliable reference point for a range of similarly performing hardware.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 87 FPS. The Low preset averages 108 FPS, providing even more headroom, but Medium offers a better visual experience while still maintaining excellent performance. The High preset (54 FPS) and Ultra preset (52 FPS) both fall short of the 60 FPS threshold, so they should be avoided at this resolution. The Medium preset's minimum frame rate of 74 FPS ensures no significant drops below the playable threshold.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 82 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it clears the 60 FPS target with a comfortable margin. The High preset (86 FPS) and Medium preset (138 FPS) are also options, but Ultra provides the full visual experience without a major performance penalty. The Medium preset's minimum frame rate of 117 FPS and maximum of 159 FPS show consistent performance, while Ultra's average of 82 FPS suggests it remains stable. At this resolution, the system has ample power to run the game at maximum quality.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is clearly the best setting, achieving an average of 114 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the most visually rich experience. The Low preset (240 FPS) and Medium preset (192 FPS) are far faster but unnecessary, as Ultra already delivers triple-digit frame rates. The Medium preset's minimum of 163 FPS and maximum of 221 FPS highlight the system's capability, but Ultra's 114 FPS average is more than sufficient for a smooth experience. There is no reason to lower settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset offers exceptional performance.

The Verdict

This PC can definitively run Inside with a smooth, playable experience at most resolutions and settings. The verdict data confirms that at 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra averaging 114 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra averaging 82 FPS. The system excels at these mainstream resolutions, offering maximum quality settings with frame rates well above the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the system is partially playable. The Low preset (108 FPS) and Medium preset (87 FPS) both clear the 60 FPS threshold, making them viable options for 4K gaming. However, the High preset (54 FPS) and Ultra preset (52 FPS) fall below the playable threshold and should be avoided. For 4K users, choosing Medium settings provides an excellent balance of visual fidelity and performance. The overall verdict is positive: this is a capable system for Inside, with the only caveat being that 4K users must moderate their settings to achieve a consistently smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers outstanding performance across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 240 FPS, representing the absolute ceiling of the hardware's capability. Medium settings average 192 FPS, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS, showing tight frame times. High settings average 120 FPS, and Ultra settings average 114 FPS. All settings at this resolution provide frame rates far above the 60 FPS threshold, making the game exceptionally smooth.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling. Low settings average 172 FPS, while Medium averages 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS and maximum of 159 FPS. High settings average 86 FPS, and Ultra settings average 82 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 28% of the frame rate at Ultra settings (from 114 FPS to 82 FPS), but all presets remain comfortably playable. The Medium preset's frame time consistency is notable, with a narrow range between minimum and maximum.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low settings average 108 FPS, and Medium averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and maximum of 100 FPS. High settings drop to 54 FPS, and Ultra falls to 52 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is a steep 33 FPS, highlighting the workload increase from the higher-quality textures and effects. The Medium preset's minimum of 74 FPS ensures it stays well above the playable threshold, but High and Ultra both dip below 60 FPS. This data clearly shows that 4K gaming requires the Medium preset or lower for a stable experience.