Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
240 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
114 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
82 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 46,062
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 54 87 108
1440p QHD 82 86 138 172
1080p Full HD 114 120 192 240

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 120
1920x1080 Low 240
1920x1080 Medium 192
1920x1080 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 86
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 138
2560x1440 Ultra 82
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Low 108
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

Can Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel Arc B570 run Inside? Yes, and the benchmark data shows it does so with significant headroom at most common gaming resolutions. This pairing of a 14-thread Arrow Lake desktop processor with Intel’s Battlemage-class Arc B570 graphics card delivers playable frame rates across nearly every setting tested, with only the most demanding 4K preset dipping below the 60 FPS threshold. The measured results place this combo in the 2983rd position out of 3716 tested configurations, indicating that while it is not at the top of the database, it comfortably handles this 2016 puzzle platformer.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 sits in a tightly contested performance band, with its nearest rivals separated by fractions of a percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 posts an average benchmark score of 46030, which is just 0.1 percent higher than the Ultra 5 235’s 46062 average. Conversely, the Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, putting it a mere 0.1 percent ahead of the Ultra 5 235. Two AMD EPYC server parts, the 4364P and the 7303, also land within 0.2 percent of this CPU’s performance, with scores of 45970 and 45960 respectively. In practical terms, anyone moving from one of these processors to another would see virtually identical frame rates in Inside, as the CPU is not the bottleneck here.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570’s average benchmark score of 20556 places it alongside the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 and is only 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Arc A750 is the closest desktop competitor, scoring 20582, which is 0.1 percent above the B570. Two older mobile GPUs, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X, also appear in the nearest rivals list with scores of 20480 and 20662, showing deltas of 0.4 percent and -0.5 percent respectively. For Inside specifically, these GPU alternatives would deliver nearly indistinguishable gameplay experiences, since the game’s modest graphical demands mean even this mid-range Arc card has ample compute headroom.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking among all processors reinforces that this is a high-end part, though its 14 threads (matching its 14 cores) and 3.40 GHz base clock scaling to 5.00 GHz boost are more than sufficient for a game like Inside. The Arc B570’s 65th percentile among all GPUs is lower, but its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth proves adequate for the game’s visuals. Given the GPU’s proximity to the Arc A750, users familiar with that card’s performance in lighter titles will find the B570 behaves similarly, while those coming from the RTX 3070 Mobile should expect slightly higher frame rates in this desktop configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest resolution and preset that maintains 60 FPS on average with this combo?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset averages 87 FPS, making it the most demanding 4K setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Higher presets at this resolution drop below 60 FPS.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an average benchmark score of 46030, which is just 0.1 percent higher than the Ultra 5 235’s 46062. This places them statistically tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B570’s closest desktop GPU competitor?

A: The Intel Arc A750 is the nearest desktop rival, scoring 20582 in average benchmarks, which is 0.1 percent above the B570’s 20556. The two cards are effectively equivalent in rasterization performance.

Q: Can this system run Inside at 2560x1440 on Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1440p Ultra is 82 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combo in Inside?

A: The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings, where the 3840x2160 resolution shows a low of 74 FPS, 1440p shows 117 FPS, and 1080p shows 163 FPS.

Q: How many tested combos does this CPU-GPU pairing outperform in Inside?

A: This combo ranks 2983rd out of 3716 total tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 733 other combos in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2983 out of 3716 places this system in the lower-middle tier of the database for Inside performance. This is not a reflection of poor capability but rather a sign that many high-end configurations with more powerful GPUs dominate the top ranks. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a strong CPU, holding the 89th percentile among all processors, but the Arc B570’s 65th percentile GPU standing holds the combo back from climbing higher.

What matters for gameplay is that this rank still sits well within playable territory. The measured data shows the system never falls below 60 FPS average at 1080p or 1440p, regardless of preset. At 4K, Low and Medium presets both deliver playable averages, with Medium hitting 87 FPS. The rank distribution suggests that while the GPU is not a flagship part, it is well matched to this game’s requirements. The gap between this combo and higher-ranked systems would only become apparent in more graphically intense titles, not in the stylized 2.5D world of Inside.

Comparing to the nearest rivals, the Arc B570’s position between the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750 means users can expect similar rankings for those alternatives. The CPU’s proximity to the i9-13900HX and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 further confirms that this is a balanced mid-to-high-end pairing. The rank is a useful reference, but the absolute FPS numbers tell a clearer story: this system clears the 60 FPS mark at every resolution with at least Medium settings.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The measured data says unequivocally yes. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra averages above 60 FPS, with Ultra hitting 114 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution is equally impressive, with all four presets clearing 60 FPS, including Ultra at 82 FPS. At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced: Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium averaging 87 FPS, but High and Ultra dip to 54 and 52 FPS respectively, falling short of the 60 FPS threshold.

The playable settings per resolution are as follows: 4K supports Low and Medium, 1440p supports all settings (High, Low, Medium, Ultra), and 1080p also supports all settings. The best settings per resolution—defined as the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS—are Medium at 4K (87 FPS), Ultra at 1440p (82 FPS), and Ultra at 1080p (114 FPS). These results indicate that the Arc B570 has enough headroom for this game’s moderate visual complexity, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (2085 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures no bottleneck in this physics-light puzzle platformer.

For users with a 60 Hz display, this system is overqualified at 1080p and 1440p, where it can push far beyond refresh rates. At 4K, the Medium preset provides a smooth experience, but pushing to High or Ultra will require lowering expectations or accepting sub-60 averages. The data is clear: this is a capable gaming system for Inside, with the only compromise being at maximum 4K settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with average FPS provided for all combinations and minimum/maximum values available for Medium settings. Starting at 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 108 FPS, which is comfortably above 60. Medium drops to 87 FPS on average, with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 100 FPS. High and Ultra presets fall below the playable threshold, averaging 54 and 52 FPS respectively, with no min/max data recorded for these settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance improves substantially. Low settings average 172 FPS, while Medium averages 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 and maximum of 159 FPS. High settings reach 86 FPS on average, and Ultra manages 82 FPS. All four presets at this resolution exceed the 60 FPS threshold, making 1440p a sweet spot for this configuration.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its full potential. Low settings hit 240 FPS on average, while Medium averages 192 FPS with a tight range of 163 to 221 FPS. High settings deliver 120 FPS, and Ultra achieves 114 FPS. The 1080p results are uniformly excellent, with even the most demanding preset providing nearly double the playable threshold. The pattern across resolutions confirms that the Arc B570 scales predictably, with 4K High/Ultra being the only settings that strain the GPU.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the optimal setting is Medium. This preset delivers an average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during scene transitions. The Low preset offers a higher 108 FPS average, but Medium provides better visual quality while still maintaining a significant margin above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra are not recommended at this resolution, as their averages of 54 and 52 FPS fall below playable levels.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is Ultra, which averages 82 FPS. This is the most demanding preset at this resolution and it still clears the 60 FPS goal by 22 frames. The High preset at 86 FPS is nearly identical in performance, but Ultra adds the extra visual effects without a meaningful cost. Users prioritizing maximum frame rates could opt for Medium at 138 FPS, but the data shows no need to compromise quality at 1440p.

For 1920x1080, Ultra is the clear choice, averaging 114 FPS. This is the highest preset available and it delivers nearly double the playable threshold. The High preset at 120 FPS and Medium at 192 FPS are also viable, but Ultra’s 114 FPS average means there is no reason to downgrade settings at this resolution. The system’s performance at 1080p is so strong that even the most demanding settings leave ample headroom for consistent frame pacing. Across all three resolutions, the best settings maximize visual quality while maintaining at least 82 FPS, demonstrating that this combo is well-suited for Inside at standard gaming resolutions.