Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

99%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
404 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
234 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
353 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
168 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
222 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
106 FPS
4.1ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 36,938
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 106 111 177 222
1440p QHD 168 176 282 353
1080p Full HD 234 245 373 404

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 245
1920x1080 Low 404
1920x1080 Medium 373
1920x1080 Ultra 234
2560x1440 High 176
2560x1440 Low 353
2560x1440 Medium 282
2560x1440 Ultra 168
3840x2160 High 111
3840x2160 Low 222
3840x2160 Medium 177
3840x2160 Ultra 106

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. Benchmark data shows this pairing is capable of running the game at maximum visual settings with frame rates far exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold across all tested resolutions. The measured FPS figures, which are based on direct data collection rather than estimates, indicate that this hardware provides a substantial performance buffer, making it an excellent match for a title of this genre and age.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU in this configuration provides context on what other hardware would deliver similar results. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36938. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which posts an average score of 36945, representing a negligible 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is nearly identical in performance, scoring 37018 with a -0.2% delta, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, -0.4%) and Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, -0.5%) round out the immediate alternatives. All four rivals fall within a half-percent of the Core Ultra 5 225, meaning users would experience virtually indistinguishable performance in Inside regardless of which of these processors is installed.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5070 achieves the 82nd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 40377. Interestingly, its nearest rivals are not modern gaming cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318 (0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063 (0.8% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870 (-1.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568 (2% delta). These workstation-oriented GPUs deliver benchmark scores within a couple of percentage points of the RTX 5070, suggesting they would produce similar frame rates in Inside. However, it is worth remembering these are professional-grade products rather than consumer gaming cards. The data shows that for this specific game, which has modest graphical demands, a wide range of GPUs including these professional alternatives would provide comparable performance.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3716 hardware combinations tested, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with the RTX 5070 achieves a combo rank of 414. This places the system in the top 11.1% of all tested configurations, indicating that this is a high-performance combination overall. The ranking reflects both the strong single-threaded and multithreaded capabilities of the CPU, as well as the substantial graphics horsepower of the GPU. For a game like Inside, which is a puzzle platformer rather than a demanding AAA title, this rank suggests the system has far more capability than required. The high percentile positions of both components (85th for CPU, 82nd for GPU) align with the strong overall combo rank, confirming that this pairing is well-balanced and positioned well above the median tested system.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows the system achieves 106 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate is 404 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The peak frame rate recorded is 429 FPS at 1080p with Medium settings.

Q: How does the system perform at 1440p compared to 4K?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the system averages 168 FPS, which is significantly higher than the 106 FPS at 4K Ultra. The performance scales predictably with resolution, with 1440p delivering roughly 58% higher frame rates than 4K at the same preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance in this game?

A: The data suggests neither component becomes a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p, as frame rates remain extremely high. At 4K Ultra, the system still maintains 106 FPS, indicating both components handle the workload comfortably. The game's modest requirements mean the RTX 5070 has ample headroom even at the highest resolutions.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this system?

A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded across all tests is 151 FPS, observed at 4K with Medium settings. This remains far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the system support modern graphics APIs for this game?

A: The RTX 5070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring full compatibility with Inside and any API features the game may utilize.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance at every resolution and preset combination tested. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at every resolution, with the 60 FPS threshold exceeded by a significant margin in all cases. At 3840x2160, the system achieves 106 FPS at Ultra settings, making 4K gaming not just possible but thoroughly smooth. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 168 FPS, while at 1920x1080, the system reaches 234 FPS at maximum settings. In fact, the lowest average frame rate recorded across all tests is 106 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still 76% above the playable threshold. This means users can enable the highest possible graphical settings without any concern about falling below smooth frame rates. The system is not merely capable of running the game; it does so with such headroom that performance-related compromises are entirely unnecessary.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals an interesting dynamic between the CPU and GPU for Inside. At 1080p, the frame rates are extraordinarily high, with Low settings achieving 404 FPS and Ultra reaching 234 FPS. These numbers suggest that at lower resolutions, the workload is light enough for both components to operate without significant strain. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a moderate performance impact: Ultra drops from 234 FPS to 168 FPS, a reduction of 28%. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the Ultra preset drops from 168 FPS to 106 FPS, a 37% reduction. This pattern indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly relevant as resolution increases, which is typical for most games. However, even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 106 FPS, demonstrating that the RTX 5070 has substantial headroom for this title.

The CPU's role is less pronounced in the data. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225, with its 10 cores and 10 threads and boost clock of 4.90 GHz, provides strong single-threaded performance as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655. This is relevant because many puzzle platformers rely heavily on single-thread performance. The measured frame rates at 1080p, where CPU load is typically highest relative to GPU load, show no indication of a CPU bottleneck—the system reaches 404 FPS at Low settings, which would strain most processors. The performance scaling between presets at the same resolution is also revealing: at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 170 FPS (404 to 234), while at 4K, the difference is 116 FPS (222 to 106). This indicates that the GPU is doing progressively more work as settings increase, but the CPU maintains stable performance throughout.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users seeking the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS, the data identifies Ultra as the optimal choice at every resolution. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings deliver an average of 106 FPS, which is the highest quality preset available and clears the playable threshold by 46 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 168 FPS, providing both maximum visual fidelity and a substantial performance cushion. Finally, at 1920x1080, Ultra settings produce 234 FPS, which is nearly four times the playable threshold. In all three cases, the system has enough performance headroom that even the most demanding settings cannot push the frame rate anywhere near the 60 FPS minimum. The minimum frame rate recorded for any Ultra preset is 151 FPS at 4K, confirming that even momentary drops remain far above playable levels. Users can therefore confidently select Ultra settings at any resolution without needing to compromise on visual quality for performance.