Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 76 | 80 | 128 | 161 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 128 | 204 | 255 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 178 | 284 | 355 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
Inside, the 2016 puzzle platformer from Playdead, is not a demanding title by modern standards, and the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combo confirms this. The benchmark results indicate that this system doesn't just meet the 60 FPS playability threshold; it shatters it at every resolution and preset tested. The data shows a hardware pairing with massive headroom, capable of delivering extremely high frame rates even at 4K with maximum settings, positioning it as an overachiever for this specific game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 achieves a combo rank of 1494 out of 3716 tested combinations in Inside. This places the pairing in the 60th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms the majority of systems in the database for this specific title. While this rank is not at the absolute top, the FPS data suggests the rank is constrained by the fact that the game is highly optimized and runs well on a wide range of hardware, making the performance deltas between mid-range and high-end components less pronounced at lower settings.
The rank is more indicative of the ceiling of the CPU-GPU pairing rather than a limitation. The Core Ultra 5 225 sits in the 85th percentile for all CPUs, and the RTX 5060 is in the 72nd percentile for all GPUs. When combined for Inside, the system's performance is so high that it saturates the game's engine, resulting in frame rates that are likely limited by the game's internal logic rather than the hardware. The data shows that the combo is placed well within the top half of all tested systems, signifying a robust and capable setup for this game, with the hardware's full potential only being partially utilized due to the title's age and low graphical complexity.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K with the highest settings?
A: Yes. The benchmark results show that at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 76 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, and the verdict data confirms that Ultra is the best playable setting at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo can achieve?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 355 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This demonstrates the extreme headroom the hardware has for this game, far exceeding the needs of most displays.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, has a nearly identical score of 36945, showing a 0% delta. Other rivals like the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 are marginally behind with scores of 37018 and 37093 respectively, resulting in deltas of -0.2% and -0.4%.
Q: Is the RTX 5060 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?
A: No, the performance is very similar. The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% ahead with a score of 26011, while the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 are effectively tied, being 0.3% behind with scores of 26401 and 26421 respectively.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 a high-end processor?
A: Based on its percentile ranking, it is a solidly mid-to-high-end part. It has a percentile of 85 vs all CPUs, which means it outperforms 85% of all processors in the database. Its multi-threaded performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo in Inside?
A: The minimum FPS data is only available for the Medium settings preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 242 FPS; at 2560x1440, it drops to 174 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 109 FPS. No minimum FPS data is available for the Low, High, or Ultra presets.
Best Settings per Resolution
For players targeting a smooth 60 FPS experience, the data indicates that the "best" setting is the most demanding one that still maintains an average above the playable threshold. In every case, this is the Ultra preset.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the Ultra preset delivers an average of 76 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440 (2K), the Ultra preset achieves an average of 122 FPS. This provides a significant performance buffer, ensuring a very smooth and responsive experience.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset yields an average of 169 FPS. This is exceptionally high, making the most of high-refresh-rate monitors without any compromise to visual fidelity.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data, several other hardware components would deliver a nearly identical experience in Inside. The performance deltas are so small that users would not notice a difference in frame rates.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is the closest match, with a 0% performance delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T are also extremely close, with deltas of -0.2%, -0.4%, and -0.5% respectively. Any of these processors would provide a virtually indistinguishable level of performance in this game, as Inside is unlikely to be a bottleneck at these levels.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the nearest rival and is actually 1.2% faster on average. The AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 are 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% slower. These GPUs would all produce frame rates within a few percent of the RTX 5060, meaning that in a game like Inside, the experience would be virtually identical across all of them.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is the complete set of measured average frame rate data for this combination.
At 1920x1080, the performance scales predictably with settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 355 FPS. The Medium preset sees a drop to 284 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 242 FPS and a maximum of 327 FPS. The High preset delivers 178 FPS, and the Ultra preset brings the average down to 169 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. The Low preset runs at an average of 255 FPS. The Medium preset averages 204 FPS, with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 235 FPS. The High preset produces 128 FPS, while the Ultra preset still manages a very smooth 122 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the hardware begins to show some strain, but still far exceeds the 60 FPS target. The Low preset yields 161 FPS. The Medium preset averages 128 FPS, with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 148 FPS. The High preset delivers 80 FPS, and the Ultra preset, the most demanding setting, still maintains an average of 76 FPS.
The Verdict
The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at every resolution tested.
At 1920x1080, the system is vastly overqualified. The best playable setting is Ultra, which runs at an average of 169 FPS, offering a flawless experience on any monitor.
At 2560x1440, the result is similarly impressive. The best playable setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 122 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold and ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming.
At 3840x2160, the hardware still has no trouble. The best playable setting is Ultra, which maintains a solid 76 FPS average. This confirms that the combo can handle the game at maximum fidelity in 4K without dropping below the target frame rate. The system provides a top-tier experience across the board, with no scenario where a player would need to compromise on visual quality to achieve smooth gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
For a game like Inside, the division of labor between the CPU and GPU is clear, but the data shows that the system is so powerful that neither component becomes a significant bottleneck at lower resolutions.
The scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU's increasing importance. At 1080p, the frame rates are astronomical (355 FPS on Low), suggesting that the GPU is not being fully utilized and the CPU may be a limiting factor at these extreme frame rates. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the frame rates drop significantly (from 355 to 255 to 161 FPS on Low), indicating that the GPU's workload is increasing and it is becoming the primary performance driver. The CPU, with its high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655), has more than enough power to feed the GPU at these settings.
The difference between presets also highlights the GPU's role. At a fixed resolution, such as 1440p, moving from Low (255 FPS) to Ultra (122 FPS) cuts the frame rate by more than half. This is a direct result of the increased pixel and shading workload on the RTX 5060. The CPU's performance is less affected by these graphical changes, as its workload in feeding the game's logic and draw calls remains consistent. Therefore, in Inside, the GPU is the dominant factor in determining frame rates as resolution and graphical fidelity increase, while the CPU provides a strong, stable foundation that prevents it from being a bottleneck in this specific title.