Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 106 | 115 | 177 | 222 |
| 1440p QHD | 169 | 177 | 285 | 357 |
| 1080p Full HD | 239 | 247 | 379 | 408 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is an exceptionally high-end combination for playing Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. The benchmark data shows this system delivers frame rates far beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution and settings preset, making it a case of overwhelming hardware headroom for the game's demands. The data indicates that even the most demanding preset at 4K resolution produces an average frame rate that is nearly double the standard playable target, while lower resolutions push into territory typically reserved for competitive esports titles.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of performance scaling across resolutions and graphical settings. At 1920x1080, the system achieves extraordinary frame rates across all presets. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 408, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Medium settings at this resolution produce an average of 379.2 FPS, while High settings yield 247 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p still delivers an average of 238.9 FPS, demonstrating that the CPU and GPU combination is far from being stressed at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high but shows the expected scaling from the 1080p results. Low settings produce an average of 357.4 FPS, followed by Medium at 284.6 FPS. High settings at 1440p deliver 176.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset maintains a robust 169.1 FPS average. The gap between Low and Medium settings at this resolution is 72.8 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is a much smaller 7.4 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns in terms of graphical fidelity versus raw frame rate at the higher end of the settings spectrum.
At 3840x2160, the system continues to deliver impressive results, though the frame rates naturally drop as pixel count increases. Low settings at 4K yield an average of 222.2 FPS, which is still far above the playable threshold. Medium settings produce 176.7 FPS, and High settings deliver 114.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K, which represents the maximum graphical load tested, still achieves an average of 105.8 FPS. This represents a 52.5% reduction in performance compared to the Low preset at the same resolution, but the absolute numbers remain exceptionally playable. Notably, the data does not include min or max FPS values for any configuration, so the analysis is based solely on average frame rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold. According to the verdict data, this system can run the Ultra preset at every resolution tested, which is the highest quality setting available in the benchmark.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 238.9 FPS, which is nearly four times the playable threshold. This makes Ultra the clear choice for 1080p gaming, as there is no performance penalty that would justify lowering settings. The data shows that even the most graphically intensive configuration at this resolution leaves enormous headroom, suggesting that users with high refresh rate monitors would benefit from the high frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset produces an average of 169.1 FPS. This is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a smooth and responsive experience even with all settings maximized. The performance drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is 69.8 FPS, but the absolute frame rate remains high enough to fully utilize most high refresh rate displays.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 105.8 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset drops below the triple-digit mark, but it still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is not just playable but actually delivers a high frame rate experience. For users prioritizing maximum graphical quality at 4K, this is the recommended configuration, as the performance headroom is sufficient to handle the most demanding visuals without compromising smoothness.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K resolution with maximum settings?*
A: Yes, the benchmark data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination achieves an average of 105.8 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, confirming that 4K Ultra is fully playable.
Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average FPS in the dataset is 408, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the least demanding configuration tested and demonstrates the extreme performance ceiling of this hardware.
Q: How does the performance scale when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 238.9 at 1920x1080 to 169.1 at 2560x1440, representing a decrease of 69.8 FPS. The frame rate remains exceptionally high at both resolutions, indicating the system is not bottlenecked by the resolution increase.
Q: Is there a significant performance difference between High and Ultra settings?
A: The data shows varying differences depending on resolution. At 3840x2160, the difference is 8.8 FPS (114.6 vs 105.8), while at 2560x1440 it is 7.4 FPS (176.5 vs 169.1). At 1920x1080, the difference is 8.1 FPS (247 vs 238.9). These small differences suggest Ultra settings are worth using for the improved visuals.
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded across all tests?
A: The lowest average FPS is 105.8, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is still significantly above the 60 FPS playable threshold, meaning there is no configuration in the dataset that falls below playable performance.
Q: Does this system ever drop below the 60 FPS playable threshold?
A: No, every tested configuration at every resolution maintains an average FPS above 60. The closest to the threshold is 4K Ultra at 105.8 FPS, which is still 45.8 FPS above the minimum playable target.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 388th out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This places it in the top 10.4% of all tested systems for this game, indicating that this hardware is significantly more powerful than the majority of configurations in the benchmark database. The high ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows exceptional performance across all resolutions and settings.
The CPU component, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, holds a percentile ranking of 94 against all CPUs in the database. This places it in the top 6% of processors tested, reflecting its strong multi-core and single-core performance. The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, has a percentile ranking of 82 against all GPUs, placing it in the top 18% of graphics cards. When combined, these two components create a system that is well above average for running Inside, as evidenced by the overall combo rank of 388 out of 3716.
The game itself, Inside, is a puzzle platformer released in 2016, and it is not a graphically demanding title by modern standards. The benchmark results reflect this, as the system achieves frame rates that are several times higher than the playable threshold even at the most demanding settings. The combo rank of 388 indicates that while this is a high-performing combination, there are 387 other tested configurations that achieve even higher performance in this specific game, likely due to even more powerful hardware or more optimized configurations.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163. The closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with an average score of 69996, which is a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX follows closely with a score of 69875, representing a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, a 0.9% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, which is 1% higher than the i7-14700KF. These CPUs would all provide very similar performance in Inside, with the differences being negligible for a game that is not CPU-intensive.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a score of 40318, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, a 2% difference. These GPUs would deliver similar frame rates in Inside, though the exact performance would vary slightly based on the specific game workload.
For users considering alternative hardware, the data suggests that swapping the i7-14700KF for any of the listed rival CPUs would result in a performance change of less than 1% in synthetic benchmarks, which would translate to a negligible difference in Inside's frame rates. Similarly, swapping the RTX 5070 for one of the rival GPUs would produce a change of at most 2% in benchmark scores, which would have a minimal impact on the already high frame rates measured for this game.
The Verdict
The benchmark data makes it clear that this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance at every resolution and settings preset tested. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 238.9 FPS, which is nearly four times the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 169.1 FPS, still far above the target. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset produces 105.8 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold.
According to the verdict data, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) are playable at every resolution, with the best settings being Ultra at each resolution. The system does not encounter any configuration that falls below the playable threshold, making it suitable for users with high refresh rate monitors or those who prefer maximum graphical quality.
In practical terms, this combination is overkill for Inside. The game, released in 2016, does not stress modern high-end hardware. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains a frame rate that is nearly double the playable target, leaving significant headroom for future games or more demanding scenarios. For users who own this hardware, the recommendation is to run Inside at the highest settings available, as there is no performance reason to compromise on visual quality. The system's performance is so high that it would be difficult to notice any difference between the Low and Ultra presets in terms of smoothness, making the choice purely a matter of visual preference.