Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
282 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
134 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
203 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
97 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
127 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
7.1ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 64 102 127
1440p QHD 97 101 162 203
1080p Full HD 134 141 226 282

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Low 282
1920x1080 Medium 226
1920x1080 Ultra 134
2560x1440 High 101
2560x1440 Low 203
2560x1440 Medium 162
2560x1440 Ultra 97
3840x2160 High 64
3840x2160 Low 127
3840x2160 Medium 102
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a combination that sits in the 2,500th position out of 3,716 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems evaluated for this puzzle platformer. This ranking indicates that while the hardware is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy, it comfortably handles the game’s demands across the board. The measured data confirms this is a system built for smooth, high-refresh-rate play at common resolutions, with the only notable constraint appearing at 4K. The combination of a high-end 14th-gen Intel CPU with a mid-range RDNA 3 GPU proves to be well-balanced for a title that is more dependent on raw FPS output than on complex visual effects.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2,500 out of 3,716 tested configurations places it in the 67th percentile of all systems benchmarked for Inside. This is a solid position, suggesting that while many systems outperform it, it is comfortably ahead of a significant portion of the tested hardware pool. The data implies that the i7-14700F and RX 7600 are well-matched for this title, avoiding the bottleneck that can occur when one component is far more powerful than the other. This ranking is a direct indicator that users can expect a consistent, playable experience, with the combination’s overall position primarily influenced by the GPU’s mid-range standing rather than any CPU limitation.

The CPU itself is a top-tier performer in synthetic benchmarks, holding a 91st percentile rank against all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 points shows it is a heavy hitter for any multi-threaded workload, and its single-core score of 4,958 is equally impressive. However, the GPU is ranked in the 57th percentile against all GPUs, and its Passmark G3D score of 16,634 is far below the top-tier cards. This asymmetry in percentile ranks is the key to understanding the system's 2,500th position: the CPU is not a limiting factor, but the GPU’s performance ceiling is what ultimately defines the frame rate boundaries in Inside.

The data shows that the i7-14700F’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and the Intel Xeon 6505P, hold very similar average scores, with deltas of only 0.6% and -0.2% respectively. This confirms that the CPU’s performance is in a highly competitive bracket, and swapping it for a direct rival would have a negligible impact on the game's FPS. On the GPU side, the RX 7600’s nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and the AMD Radeon 680M, also show very close scores, with a -0.2% and -0.7% delta. This suggests that the gaming experience with this CPU and GPU combo is representative of a specific performance tier, and users with similar hardware should expect comparable results.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in the balance of power between the CPU and GPU as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates immense headroom, with an average FPS of 226 at Medium settings and 282 at Low. The difference between the high and low presets is substantial, indicating that the GPU is the primary scaling factor, but the CPU is powerful enough to never hold it back. The CPU’s single-thread strength ensures that the frame generation pipeline is never starved, allowing the RX 7600 to output its maximum capacity.

As we move to 2560x1440, the GPU’s workload intensifies, but the system still maintains high frame rates. The average FPS at High settings is 101, which is only a 28% drop from the 1080p High score of 141. This moderate scaling suggests that the GPU is still the primary driver, but the CPU’s strong performance ensures it can keep up with the increased rendering load. The data indicates that this is a comfortable zone for the combo, where the GPU is well-utilized without being completely overwhelmed.

The dynamic shifts at 3840x2160, where the GPU’s limitations become fully exposed. The average FPS at High settings drops to 64, representing a 55% decrease from the 1440p High score. This significant scaling shows that the game is now almost entirely GPU-bound. The CPU’s role diminishes, and the RX 7600’s 8GB of memory and 128-bit bus become the determining factors for performance. The data implies that at 4K, the CPU is simply providing enough frames for the GPU to render, and the GPU’s raw pixel-pushing power is the sole gatekeeper for playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RX 7600 is able to stretch its legs, and the data shows exceptional performance across all presets. The Low preset yields a staggering 282 average FPS, which reflects the game's scalability and the CPU's ability to feed frames. The Medium preset sees a decrease to 226 average FPS, with a recorded minimum of 192 and a maximum of 259 FPS, showing a still extremely fluid gaming experience. High settings at 1080p produce an average of 141 FPS, and the Ultra preset, which is typically the most demanding, still achieves a very high average of 134 FPS. This demonstrates that even at the highest settings, the system has massive headroom, and the game is unlikely to dip below the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down, but remains impressive. The Low preset achieves 203 average FPS, indicating the CPU is still not a limiting factor. The Medium preset shows an average of 162 FPS, with a minimum of 138 and a maximum of 186 FPS, showing a drop-off from 1080p but still a very smooth experience. The High preset at 1440p delivers 101 average FPS, which is a solid number for a demanding resolution. The Ultra preset is the most interesting, still yielding an average of 97 FPS. This suggests the game is not heavily taxing the GPU’s shading units, and the system is well-suited for high-refresh rate monitors at this resolution.

At 4K, the data reveals the system's limits. The Low preset still gives a high 127 average FPS, showing the game is flexible with its settings. The Medium preset yields 102 average FPS, with a minimum of 87 and maximum of 117 FPS, which is still playable. However, the High preset drops to 64 average FPS, and the Ultra preset is just above the playable threshold, with an average of 61 FPS. The lack of recorded minimum FPS data for the High and Ultra presets suggests that the frame pacing may be less consistent at these settings, and the system is clearly pushing the RX 7600 to its limit.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset?*

A: Yes, it can run the game at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, but just barely. The benchmark shows an average of 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, but only by a single frame. This also means it's the most demanding preset at that resolution, and users should expect an average performance that is right on the edge of the playable limit.

Q: What are the best settings to play at 1920x1080?

A: The best settings at 1920x1080 are on the Ultra preset, which yields an average FPS of 134. This is the highest quality preset tested, and the system has enough power to run it without issue. The data shows that the game is very CPU-friendly, and the GPU has ample headroom to handle the highest visual quality without a significant performance penalty.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals in terms of performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F is very closely matched with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is only 0.6% faster in average benchmark scores, while the Intel Xeon 6505P is a mere 0.2% behind. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, swapping in a rival CPU would not result in a meaningful change in frame rate.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at 2560x1440?

A The data shows that it is not a major bottleneck. At 2560x1440, the system achieves an average of 101 FPS on High and 97 FPS on Ultra. These scores are well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance drop of roughly 30%, which is a typical sign of a balanced system with a CPU that is not holding the GPU back.

Q: What is the system's overall ranking for this game?

A The system ranks 2,500th out of 3,716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the 67th percentile, meaning it performs better than a majority of systems. The data suggests that the combo is well within the range for a high-performance experience, but it is not top-tier due to the GPU's mid-range standing.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 134 FPS. This is the highest quality setting, and the system easily clears the playable threshold, leaving ample headroom for consistent performance.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, with an average of 97 FPS. This demonstrates the system’s ability to handle high resolutions with the highest visual fidelity, and the frame rate is still well above the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS line is the Ultra preset. It achieves an average of exactly 61 FPS, which is just barely playable. While the High preset also averages 64 FPS, the Ultra preset is the most demanding one that still meets the playable threshold, making it the best choice for visual quality, but with little room for error.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally answers the question: yes, this PC can run Inside. The verdict by resolution is that all tested settings are playable at every resolution. At 1920x1080, the system achieves a perfect performance, with Ultra settings averaging 134 FPS. At 2560x1440, it maintains 97 FPS on Ultra, which is a great result. At 3840x2160, the system still clears the 60 FPS mark on the Ultra preset, averaging 61 FPS. This indicates a system that is well-suited for the game, with a strong CPU ensuring high frame rates, and a capable GPU that still offers a playable 4K experience at the highest settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

If the Intel Core i7-14700F were not available, the nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which has a benchmark score that is only 0.6% higher. This means a user with a Ryzen 9 7900X would see virtually identical frame rates in Inside. Similarly, the Intel Xeon 6505P is 0.2% behind in performance, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is a 0.3% ahead, showing a tightly packed group of high-end CPUs. On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti are the closest rivals, with scores that are 0.6% and 0.7% higher, respectively, which would translate to a negligible difference in FPS. The AMD Radeon 680M is 0.7% lower, suggesting a highly comparable gaming experience. This data suggests that if a user has any of these components, they can expect the same level of performance and playability in Inside.