Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 74 | 80 | 130 | 162 |
| 1440p QHD | 123 | 126 | 200 | 251 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 177 | 280 | 355 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a decisive performance level in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that proves remarkably forgiving on modern hardware. Benchmark data shows this combination never dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold at any tested resolution or preset, with average frame rates ranging from a low of 73.6 FPS at 4K Ultra to a staggering 354.7 FPS at 1080p Low. The measured results indicate a system with massive headroom, capable of running the game at maximum visual quality even on the most demanding 4K displays.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces overwhelming frame rates across all four settings presets. The Low preset yields an average of 354.7 FPS, while Medium delivers 280.4 FPS and High reaches 176.9 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset still produces an average of 169.1 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS target. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the limiting factor is unlikely to be the GPU or CPU in any meaningful way; the system is essentially outputting frames as fast as the game engine allows.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally strong but shows a predictable decline as pixel count increases. Low settings average 250.5 FPS, Medium drops to 199.7 FPS, and High settles at 126.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, which represents the heaviest load, still averages 122.9 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of roughly 27-30% across all presets, indicating that resolution scaling is the primary driver of performance changes rather than settings complexity.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to feel the weight of 8.3 million pixels, but it never struggles. The Low preset averages 161.7 FPS, Medium produces 129.5 FPS, and High manages 79.8 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration tested, averages 73.6 FPS. This remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold, though the gap narrows significantly compared to lower resolutions. The data shows a clear trend: from 1080p to 4K, the average FPS drops by approximately 55-60% depending on the preset, which is consistent with the increased pixel throughput required.
The benchmark data includes no minimum or maximum frame rate values, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS. However, given the enormous margins above 60 FPS at every data point, even significant frame time spikes would be unlikely to push the experience below the playable threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 169.1 FPS. This preset provides the maximum visual fidelity available in the game while still delivering frame rates that are nearly three times the 60 FPS target. There is no reason to compromise on visual quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, averaging 122.9 FPS. This is a substantial margin above the playable threshold, ensuring a smooth experience even during complex scene transitions or physics-heavy puzzle sequences. The data shows that Ultra at 1440p is more than viable for high-refresh-rate displays.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains the best settings option, with an average of 73.6 FPS. This is the only resolution where the margin above 60 FPS becomes modest, but it still clears the threshold with roughly 23% headroom. For users with 4K displays, running the game at maximum settings is achievable without dropping to High or Medium presets. The verdict data confirms that all four settings at 4K (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra being the recommended choice.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1586 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the 57th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 43% of tested combos perform better. Given that Inside is a lightweight puzzle platformer from 2016, this mid-pack ranking is unsurprising; many higher-end GPUs and CPUs will produce even higher frame rates, but the practical difference is minimal since the game is already running far above playable thresholds.
The ranking reflects the overall capability of the combo across all resolutions and presets. While the RTX 5060 is a current-generation GPU, its 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs and the i7-13700K's 89th percentile among CPUs contribute to a system that is well above average but not top-tier. The combo's rank in this specific game suggests that it sits comfortably in the upper half of systems, with plenty of headroom for this particular title but without the absolute peak performance of flagship hardware.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at CPU rivals, the Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.2% lower, making it a nearly identical performer. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, again 0.3% lower. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, which is 0.5% higher, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653, also 0.5% higher. These four alternatives would produce essentially indistinguishable frame rates in Inside, as the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution tested.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, just 0.3% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% higher. These GPU alternatives would produce very similar results in Inside, with the performance delta being negligible in practice. A user with any of these CPUs or GPUs paired with a comparable counterpart would expect nearly identical frame rates across all resolutions and presets.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the GPU is the primary performance driver in Inside, particularly at higher resolutions. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a significant drop in average FPS across all presets, which is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads. At 1080p Ultra, the combo produces 169.1 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 73.6 FPS, a reduction of approximately 56%. This steep decline indicates that the rendering load at 4K is substantially heavier on the GPU.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and lower presets. At 1080p Low, the system hits 354.7 FPS, which is likely approaching the game's engine limits or the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls. The i7-13700K, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, is more than capable of handling the game's logic, but the extreme frame rates at 1080p suggest that CPU overhead could become a factor if the GPU were even faster.
The settings scaling within each resolution provides further insight. At 4K, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 161.7 to 73.6, a 54% drop. At 1440p, the same settings change reduces FPS from 250.5 to 122.9, a 51% drop. At 1080p, the reduction is from 354.7 to 169.1, a 52% drop. The consistency of these percentages across resolutions suggests that the settings presets impose a similar relative load increase regardless of pixel count, and that the GPU is handling both the resolution and settings scaling without CPU interference.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination can absolutely run Inside, and it does so with exceptional ease. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets clear 60 FPS, with the best settings being Ultra at 169.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 122.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system maintains 60 FPS across all presets, with Ultra delivering 73.6 FPS.
The verdict data confirms that every resolution and every preset is playable, with no exceptions. This means users can max out the game's visual settings at any resolution without worrying about performance. The lowest recorded average FPS across the entire test matrix is 73.6 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold. For a game like Inside, which relies on atmospheric puzzles rather than fast-twitch gameplay, even the 4K Ultra experience would feel perfectly smooth.
This system is effectively overkill for Inside, offering frame rates that are 2.5 to 6 times higher than needed at most settings. The only scenario where a user might want more performance is if they are using a high-refresh-rate 4K display (e.g., 120Hz or 144Hz) and wish to run Ultra settings, where the 73.6 FPS average would not fully saturate such a display. However, for standard 60Hz displays, this combo provides a flawless experience at maximum quality across all resolutions.