Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
345 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
167 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
251 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
122 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
154 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
76 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 76 78 128 154
1440p QHD 122 124 199 251
1080p Full HD 167 176 276 345

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 176
1920x1080 Low 345
1920x1080 Medium 276
1920x1080 Ultra 167
2560x1440 High 124
2560x1440 Low 251
2560x1440 Medium 199
2560x1440 Ultra 122
3840x2160 High 78
3840x2160 Low 154
3840x2160 Medium 128
3840x2160 Ultra 76

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a decisive performance verdict for Inside: this combination is overwhelmingly powerful for the game, achieving playable frame rates at every resolution and preset tested. At 4K Ultra, the combo still produces an average of 76.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows a system that is effectively bottlenecked by the game's modest demands rather than by any hardware limitation, making it an excellent match for high-refresh-rate displays at 1440p and 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of high performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system delivers exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 345.0, providing a massive headroom for competitive or high-refresh gameplay. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 275.8 FPS, still an enormous figure. High settings produce an average of 176.0 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset yields 167.0 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p results in a performance reduction of roughly 51.6%, but even at its lowest point, the frame rate is nearly three times the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains stellar, though the resolution increase begins to show its impact. Low settings at 1440p produce an average of 251.1 FPS, which is 27.2% lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 198.9 FPS, representing a 27.9% decrease from the equivalent 1080p setting. High settings at 1440p average 124.2 FPS, a 29.4% drop from 1080p High. Ultra settings at 1440p average 121.7 FPS, which is 27.1% lower than the 1080p Ultra result. The consistency of this ~27% reduction across all settings indicates that the GPU's fillrate and shading capabilities are being scaled uniformly with resolution, with no unexpected bottlenecks.

The 3840x2160 results are where the RTX 3060 Ti starts to show its limits, though the system remains fully playable. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 153.5, which is 38.8% lower than 1080p Low. Medium settings at 4K average 127.8 FPS, a 53.7% reduction from 1080p Medium. High settings at 4K drop to 77.5 FPS, a 56.0% reduction from 1080p High. Ultra settings at 4K produce 76.3 FPS, a 54.3% reduction from 1080p Ultra. Notably, the gap between High and Ultra at 4K is minimal (77.5 vs 76.3 FPS), suggesting that Ultra settings impose a similar load to High at this resolution, likely due to diminishing returns in shadow or post-processing effects.

Across all resolutions, the difference between High and Ultra settings is consistently small: 5.1% at 1080p, 2.0% at 1440p, and 1.5% at 4K. This indicates that the Ultra preset adds minimal additional rendering cost over High for this title, making it the logical choice for users seeking maximum visual fidelity without meaningful performance sacrifice. The data also shows that min and max FPS values are not reported for any configuration, so the analysis relies on average FPS, which is sufficient given the high absolute numbers.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for how this combo compares to nearby hardware. The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs tested. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971, a delta of -0.2% (meaning the i7-13700K is effectively tied with it). The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654 (+0.5%), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653 (+0.5%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that swapping the i7-13700K for any of these rivals would yield virtually identical frame rates in Inside, as the game is not CPU-intensive at these settings.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the average benchmark score is 16129, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with a score of 16014 (0.7% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351 (-1.4%, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti is 1.4% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 (-1.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (1.7% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti). In practical terms for Inside, any of these GPUs would deliver within 2% of the RTX 3060 Ti's performance, meaning users with these alternatives would see nearly identical FPS numbers. For example, at 4K Ultra, the RX 9060 might produce roughly 76.8 FPS instead of 76.3 FPS, a difference imperceptible to the human eye.

The percentile rankings are also telling: the CPU at the 89th percentile is a top-tier part, while the GPU at the 59th percentile is a mid-range offering. This imbalance suggests that in more demanding games, the GPU would be the limiting factor, but for Inside, the CPU's strength ensures that even at 1080p Low (345 FPS), the system is never held back by processor performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component roles depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is dominant. The i7-13700K, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, provides ample single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116) to push frame rates to 345 FPS at Low settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 51.6% reduction in FPS, which is almost entirely attributable to GPU load increases, but the absolute numbers (345 to 167 FPS) suggest that the GPU is still not saturated. The CPU's high average benchmark score of 46881 and its 89th percentile ranking ensure that it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistently around 27% across all settings, which aligns with the GPU's pixel throughput limitations. The RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are being utilized more fully. The CPU's role diminishes, as the frame rates (121.7 to 251.1 FPS) are still high enough that the processor's 3.40 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost clocks are more than sufficient. The data indicates that at 1440p, the system is transitioning from CPU-bound to GPU-bound, but the crossover point is not reached because the GPU still has headroom.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The 4K results show a much steeper drop from 1080p: 38.8% at Low, 53.7% at Medium, 56.0% at High, and 54.3% at Ultra. This non-linear scaling, particularly the jump from Low to Medium (153.5 to 127.8 FPS, a 16.7% reduction), indicates that the GPU's memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s) and pixel rate (133.2 GPixel/s) are being taxed heavily. The CPU's role is nearly negligible at this resolution, as even the weakest preset (4K Ultra at 76.3 FPS) is far below the CPU's capability ceiling. The combination of the i7-13700K's 30 MB L3 cache and the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for this game, but the data shows that any further resolution increase would push the GPU decisively into sub-60 FPS territory.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: at 4K, the best playable setting is Ultra at 76.3 FPS, which is only 16.3 FPS above the playable threshold. At 1440p, Ultra produces 121.7 FPS, and at 1080p, Ultra produces 167 FPS. The scaling between resolutions (167 to 121.7 to 76.3 FPS from 1080p to 1440p to 4K at Ultra) shows a 27% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 54% drop from 1440p to 4K, illustrating the GPU's exponential load increase at higher pixel counts.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K with the highest settings?*

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 76.3, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at 4K are playable, with High at 77.5 FPS and Ultra at 76.3 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maximize frame rate?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 345.0 FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate. However, at 1080p Ultra, it still delivers 167.0 FPS, making 1080p Ultra the best balance of visual quality and performance for high-refresh displays.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals for this game?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 16014 versus 16129 for the RTX 3060 Ti, a delta of 0.7%. This means the RX 9060 is slightly faster, but in Inside, the difference would be less than 1 FPS at most settings, making them effectively interchangeable.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700K overkill for this game?

A: The data suggests yes, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 46881 are far beyond the demands of Inside. However, this over-provisioning ensures that the CPU never bottlenecks the GPU, even at 1080p Low where frame rates reach 345.0 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: The difference is minimal across all resolutions. At 1080p, High averages 176.0 FPS and Ultra averages 167.0 FPS (a 5.1% gap). At 1440p, the gap is 2.0% (124.2 vs 121.7 FPS), and at 4K, it is 1.5% (77.5 vs 76.3 FPS). Ultra is always the better choice as the visual upgrade costs almost nothing.

*Q: Does the combo rank well among all tested systems for Inside?*

A: The combo ranks 1658 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the 55th percentile of all systems. This is a solid mid-pack ranking, indicating that while this hardware is not top-tier for the game, it delivers performance that is well above the playable threshold at all settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average FPS of 76.3. This is the highest quality option available, and the data confirms that even the most graphically intense preset at 4K maintains a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. Users can confidently enable Ultra at 4K without needing to compromise on visual features.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, producing an average of 121.7 FPS. This frame rate is more than double the playable threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors in the 120-144 Hz range. The 1440p Ultra setting offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while still delivering exceptionally smooth gameplay.

For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra as well, with an average of 167.0 FPS. This is the optimal configuration for competitive or fast-paced play, as it provides maximum visual fidelity alongside a frame rate that exceeds most high-refresh displays' capabilities. The 1080p Ultra setting represents the best overall experience, balancing image quality with a frame rate that leaves substantial headroom for any potential frame drops.

Across all three resolutions, the verdict is consistent: Ultra settings are universally playable, and the system never requires a reduction to Medium or Low to maintain 60 FPS. The measured data shows that the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination provides a "set it and forget it" experience for Inside, where users can max out all settings at any resolution and still enjoy smooth, responsive gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 1658 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, specifically in the 55.4th percentile (calculated as 1 - 1658/3716). This ranking is notable because it is significantly lower than what the CPU's 89th percentile ranking might suggest, indicating that the GPU's 59th percentile ranking drags the overall combo down relative to systems with higher-end graphics cards.

The ranking reflects the GPU-bound nature of Inside at higher resolutions. While the CPU is a top-tier part, the RTX 3060 Ti is a mid-range GPU, and the combo's rank of 1658 shows that many systems with more powerful GPUs (such as RTX 3070 or higher) would outperform it. However, the practical impact of this ranking is minimal for Inside specifically, as the game's low system requirements mean that even a combo ranked in the 55th percentile delivers frame rates well above 60 FPS at all settings. The data shows that the combo's rank would be more consequential in a demanding AAA title, but for Inside, the 76.3 FPS at 4K Ultra is a strong result that most users would consider excellent.

Compared to the nearest rival combos, the CPU's deltas of -0.2% to +0.5% against its rivals and the GPU's deltas of -1.4% to +1.7% against its rivals suggest that swapping either component for a close alternative would shift the combo's rank by only a few positions. For example, pairing the i7-13700K with the slightly faster AMD Radeon RX 9060 might improve the rank to around 1640, while using the slower AMD Radeon R9 370X could drop it to around 1680. These are negligible differences that would not affect the playability verdict at any resolution. The combo's rank of 1658 confirms the balance between the CPU's high-end capability and the GPU's mid-range performance, a pairing that proves more than sufficient for this puzzle platformer.