Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
309 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
147 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
222 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
106 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
66 FPS
6.5ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 70 112 140
1440p QHD 106 111 178 222
1080p Full HD 147 155 247 309

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 155
1920x1080 Low 309
1920x1080 Medium 247
1920x1080 Ultra 147
2560x1440 High 111
2560x1440 Low 222
2560x1440 Medium 178
2560x1440 Ultra 106
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 112
3840x2160 Ultra 66

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a decisive performance envelope for Inside, a Puzzle Platformer from 2016. The measured data indicates that this combination is not merely capable of running the game, but does so with substantial headroom at every resolution and preset level tested. The results show a system where the most demanding settings at the highest resolution still comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, making it a high-confidence recommendation for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark data provides clear guidance on the optimal visual configuration for each resolution, focusing on the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system can handle the Ultra preset. The measured average frame rate at this setting is 66 FPS. This is the highest achievable visual quality, and it still remains 6 FPS above the playability threshold. While the High preset runs at a slightly higher average of 70 FPS, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that does not drop below 60 FPS average, thus offering the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

Moving down to 2560x1440 (QHD), the situation improves further. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 106 FPS. This is a massive margin over the 60 FPS target, indicating that the GPU has ample performance to spare at this resolution. The data shows that all lower presets, from High to Low, run at even higher frame rates, but the Ultra setting is the definitive choice for maximum visual fidelity here.

At 1920x1080 (FHD), the Ultra preset delivers an exceptional average of 147 FPS. This performance level is far beyond what is needed for smooth gameplay. The substantial headroom suggests that users with high-refresh-rate monitors, such as 144Hz or 165Hz panels, will be able to fully utilize their display's capabilities while maintaining the highest graphical preset. The combo is so powerful at this resolution that it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in any scenario.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance distribution between the CPU and GPU can be inferred by analyzing how frame rates scale with resolution and preset changes. The data shows that as the resolution increases, the workload shifts more toward the GPU.

For this specific configuration, the CPU is a high-end component, the Intel Core i7-13700K, with a benchmark percentile of 89 for all CPUs. Its performance is very strong, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, has a percentile of 59 for all GPUs, indicating it is also a robust performer but is the more likely bottleneck in this pairing, especially at higher resolutions.

The scaling between presets provides a clear illustration. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium reduces the average FPS from 309 to 247, a drop of 62 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is even more pronounced, going from 247 to 155 FPS. This indicates that the game becomes increasingly more demanding on the GPU as the preset quality increases. At 4K, the difference between Low and Medium is 28 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is a smaller 4 FPS, suggesting the visual fidelity gains become more expensive on the GPU at lower resolution.

The impact of the GPU is further highlighted by the frame rate differences between resolutions at the same setting. For example, at the Ultra preset, the frame rate drops from 147 at 1080p to 106 at 1440p, and then to 66 at 4K. This is a clear indication of the GPU becoming the bottleneck. The CPU has the raw power, as it is capable of delivering over 300 FPS on the Low setting at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain that pace when the number of pixels increases. In short, the CPU is not the limiting factor for this game; the GPU is the component that determines the final frame rate, especially at higher resolutions and settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users considering this CPU and GPU combination, the benchmark data lists several alternatives with very similar performance that would yield comparable results in Inside.

For the Intel Core i7-13700K, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are a set of CPUs with a delta of less than 1%. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is essentially a performance match, with a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is also extremely close, with a delta of -0.3%. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 are both 0.5% faster. Any of these processors would deliver a nearly identical experience.

For the AMD Radeon RX 9060, the closest rivals are also within a small margin. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a near-identical match, with a delta of -0.7%. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is only 1% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% faster. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is also within a 1% margin. These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates to the RX 9060 in Inside, meaning users with these cards should see comparable performance.

The Verdict

The data is definitive: this PC can run Inside with maximum settings at all tested resolutions. The verdict by resolution is clear.

  • 3840x2160 (4K): Yes, fully playable. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 66 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. All lower presets are also playable.
  • 2560x1440 (QHD): Yes, fully playable. The Ultra preset achieves an exceptional average of 106 FPS. This is a very high level of performance that offers a fluid experience with all visual features enabled.
  • 1920x1080 (FHD): Yes, fully playable. The Ultra preset runs at an average of 147 FPS. This performance is more than enough for a high-refresh-rate display and makes the game feel extremely responsive.

In every case, the best possible settings are also the playable settings. This confirms the performance of this combination.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data provides a detailed look at the measured frame rates for each resolution and settings combination.

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Ultra: Average 66 FPS.
  • High: Average 70 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 112 FPS, with a minimum of 95 and a maximum of 128 FPS.
  • Low: Average 140 FPS.

2560x1440 (QHD)

  • Ultra: Average 106 FPS.
  • High: Average 111 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 178 FPS, with a minimum of 151 and a maximum of 204 FPS.
  • Low: Average 222 FPS.

1920x1080 (FHD)

  • Ultra: Average 147 FPS.
  • High: Average 155 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 247 FPS, with a minimum of 210 and a maximum of 284 FPS.
  • Low: Average 309 FPS.

The frame rate data shows a consistent pattern. The minimum and maximum FPS figures for the Medium settings indicate that the frame time is stable, with the low-end not falling below the playable threshold. Even in the most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, the average is 66 FPS, and the absence of a min/max reading for the High and Ultra settings suggests the data was collected with the average being the key metric for those presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination is ranked 2129 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the top 57.3% of all tested configurations.

This rank is a direct result of the GPU's performance relative to other test setups. While the CPU is a high-end part, the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing. The frame rates are high and playable, but the GPU's percentile of 59 means there are many other setups with more powerful graphics cards that achieve even higher frame rates, particularly at lower resolution. The rank shows this is a mid-to-high-tier performer, but it is not a top-tier competitor. The fact that the GPU is the same or similar to other cards in the benchmark pool, like the RTX 3060 Ti and the RX 7700, also places this combo in a specific performance tier. This combination is excellent for 4K gaming on this title, but the rank indicates that other more powerful GPU combos would be in a higher tier.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K with all settings on Ultra?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 66 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 2560x1440 monitor?

A: The Ultra preset is the best setting. The data shows it achieves an average of 106 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS target.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the more important factor for this game?

A: The GPU is the more limiting factor. The CPU is very strong, but the frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a clear sign of GPU-bound performance. For example, at 1080p Ultra the average is 147 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it drops to 66 FPS.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The two GPUs are very similar in performance. The average benchmark score for the RX 9060 is 16014, while the RTX 3060 Ti is 16129. The delta is -0.7%, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti is 0.7% faster.

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Inside?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 309, which occurs at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700K faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: No, they are extremely close. The Ryzen 9 5900 has an average score of 46971, while the Core i7-13700K has an average score of 46881. The deltaPct is -0.2%, meaning the Ryzen 9 5900 is 0.2% faster.