Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

96%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
349 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
170 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
255 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
118 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
158 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
76 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 26,011

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 76 83 126 158
1440p QHD 118 125 201 255
1080p Full HD 170 177 284 349

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 177
1920x1080 Low 349
1920x1080 Medium 284
1920x1080 Ultra 170
2560x1440 High 125
2560x1440 Low 255
2560x1440 Medium 201
2560x1440 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 83
3840x2160 Low 158
3840x2160 Medium 126
3840x2160 Ultra 76

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a decisive performance profile for Inside, a Puzzle Platformer from 2016. Measured data shows this combination handles the game with substantial headroom across all tested resolutions and settings. The benchmark results indicate that every single configuration tested exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this a high-performance pairing for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) across four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). All figures are average FPS; no minimum or maximum frame time data was recorded for any configuration.

At 1920x1080, the results are exceptionally high. The Low preset produces an average of 349.4 FPS. Moving to Medium drops the average to 283.7 FPS, a reduction of 65.7 FPS from Low. The High preset yields 177 FPS, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding, still maintains an average of 169.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a total performance cost of 179.6 FPS, with the steepest single-step decline occurring between Medium and High (106.7 FPS).

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues with strong performance. Low settings reach an average of 254.8 FPS. Medium settings deliver 201.4 FPS, which is 53.4 FPS lower than Low. High settings average 124.5 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 118.3 FPS. The transition from Medium to High at this resolution represents a 76.9 FPS drop, which is the most significant gap between any two consecutive presets here. The overall spread between Low and Ultra is 136.5 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance remains comfortably above 60 FPS. Low settings achieve an average of 158 FPS. Medium settings follow at 126.3 FPS, a 31.7 FPS reduction. High settings average 82.8 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 75.9 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 6.9 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a relatively modest additional load over High at this resolution. The total scaling from Low to Ultra here is 82.1 FPS.

Comparing across resolutions, the data shows consistent scaling. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 169.8 at 1080p to 118.3 at 1440p, then to 75.9 at 4K. At Low settings, the progression is from 349.4 at 1080p to 254.8 at 1440p to 158 at 4K. The performance penalty for moving from 1080p to 4K is most pronounced at the Low preset, where the average FPS falls by 191.4 FPS, while at Ultra the drop is 93.9 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark data identifies the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution. For this hardware, all tested presets exceed that threshold, so the best settings are always the Ultra preset.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 169.8 FPS. This is the highest fidelity option and it provides massive headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 118.3 FPS. This configuration also clears the 60 FPS bar by a wide margin, allowing for full visual quality at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 75.9 FPS. While this is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo, it still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by 15.9 FPS, making it the recommended setting for 4K play.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data provides context for how this specific CPU and GPU compare to other hardware in their respective benchmark pools.

For the Intel Core i7-13700K, the closest performance equivalents are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. The Core i7-13700K scores 46881 in the average benchmark, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, 0.5% lower, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 also scores 46653, 0.5% lower. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside.

For the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, the AMD FirePro W7100, the AMD FirePro D700, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011. The R9 M395X scores 25891, which is 0.5% lower. The FirePro W7100 scores 25856, 0.6% lower. The FirePro D700 scores 25842, 0.7% lower. The RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740, 1.1% lower. Again, these differences are minimal, so any of these GPUs would deliver essentially the same gameplay experience in Inside as the RX 6750 XT.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, the measured data shows that at 3840x2160, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) produce average FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Ultra preset averages 75.9 FPS.

Q: What is the highest settings preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 118.3 FPS, which is comfortably above 60 FPS. Since all lower presets also exceed this threshold, Ultra is the best setting available at this resolution.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 349.4 FPS while the Ultra preset averages 169.8 FPS. This represents a difference of 179.6 FPS between the two settings.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more likely to be the bottleneck for this game?

A: The data shows that performance scales significantly with resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 349.4, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 75.9. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary factor limiting frame rates, as the workload increases with resolution and graphical fidelity.

Q: What is the frame rate at Medium settings for 2560x1440?

A: The measured average FPS for the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is 201.4.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations for Inside?*

A: This combination of Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1599 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the upper portion of the benchmark database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data allows for an analysis of which component plays a larger role in Inside at each resolution. The game’s performance scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is steep, and the settings presets amplify this effect.

At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 349.4 (Low) to 169.8 (Ultra). The very high frame rates at Low settings suggest that the CPU, the Intel Core i7-13700K, has sufficient single-thread and multi-thread capacity to feed frames well beyond typical display refresh rates. The drop to 169.8 FPS at Ultra indicates that the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, begins to take on a heavier load, but it still has ample headroom.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. Low settings average 254.8 FPS, while Ultra averages 118.3 FPS. The relative drop from Low to Ultra here is 53.6%, compared to a 51.4% drop at 1080p. This suggests that the GPU is starting to become the limiting factor as pixel count increases, but the CPU is still capable of driving the frame rates upward when the GPU is not saturated.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. Low settings average 158 FPS, and Ultra averages 75.9 FPS. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 52.0%. The absolute frame rates at 4K are significantly lower than at 1080p, which is expected given the 4x increase in pixel count. The fact that Ultra settings still exceed 60 FPS demonstrates that the RX 6750 XT has sufficient raw throughput for this title, while the CPU’s performance headroom is less relevant at this resolution because the GPU is doing the majority of the work.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this interpretation. At Ultra settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces the average FPS by 51.5, and moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it by another 42.4. At Low settings, the corresponding reductions are 94.6 and 96.8 FPS. The larger absolute drops at Low settings indicate that the frame rate is more sensitive to resolution changes when the graphics workload is lighter, which points to the GPU being the primary bottleneck across all tested configurations. The CPU’s contribution is most visible at 1080p Low, where the data shows 349.4 FPS, a level that would challenge most CPUs, but the Core i7-13700K is clearly up to the task.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this specific hardware pairing at rank 1599 out of a total of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This positioning means that approximately 57% of tested combos rank below this one, while 43% rank above it. The rank reflects the overall performance of the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT together, not just their individual benchmark scores.

In context, the CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 89, indicating it outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 71. The combination’s rank in this specific game suggests that Inside is not particularly demanding on either component, allowing this mid-to-high-end pairing to achieve frame rates that are far above the playable threshold. The rank of 1599 out of 3716 is solid, but it is not near the top because many other tested combos include more powerful GPUs or CPUs that push frame rates even higher, particularly at 1080p where the CPU can drive extreme FPS values.

The data shows no configuration dips below 75.9 FPS, which means that even the lowest-performing setting at the highest resolution is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This consistency is reflected in the rank, which is determined by average performance across all tested settings and resolutions.

The Verdict

The verdictByResolution data is unambiguous: this PC can run Inside at every resolution and preset tested, with all configurations exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 169.8 FPS, which is the best settings available. The Low preset reaches 349.4 FPS, but Ultra is recommended because it maintains a frame rate that is nearly three times the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 118.3 FPS, again the best settings. This resolution provides a higher pixel density while still delivering nearly double the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 75.9 FPS, which clears the threshold by 15.9 FPS. This is the only configuration where performance approaches the limit, but it still qualifies as fully playable. Lower settings at 4K provide higher frame rates, with Low averaging 158 FPS, Medium at 126.3 FPS, and High at 82.8 FPS, but none are necessary for a smooth experience.

In summary, the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination provides a definitive "yes" for running Inside. The game is not a demanding title for this hardware, and the data confirms that players can use the highest visual settings at any resolution without sacrificing the 60 FPS target. The weakest measured result, 75.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, is still comfortably above the playable threshold, leaving no reason to compromise on graphics quality.