Inside

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers an exceptional experience in Inside, with benchmark results showing the combination far exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The data confirms this is a high-performance pairing: the CPU ranks in the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards. Across all twelve measured configurations, the lowest average frame rate recorded is 107.2 FPS at 4K Ultra, meaning the system never dips below the playability threshold even under maximum graphical load.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database places the Intel Core i7-12700K in close proximity to several other processors based on average benchmark scores. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13600T, which scores an average of 35305 compared to the i7-12700K’s 35287, a negligible delta of -0.1%. This indicates the i5-13600T would offer nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Inside. Similarly, the Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365, a 0.2% delta, meaning users would see no practical difference in frame rates. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (-0.3% delta) and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (-0.4% delta), both of which fall within the margin of error for real-world gaming performance. For this title, which is not heavily CPU-bound at these frame rates, any of these processors would produce essentially the same results as the i7-12700K.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070’s average benchmark score of 40377 places it near several AMD professional-grade cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318, a 0.1% delta, making it the closest equivalent in raw compute terms. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063 (0.8% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870 (-1.2% delta). The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568 (2% delta). While these professional cards are not typical gaming products, the data suggests that in synthetic benchmarks they occupy a similar performance tier. However, for Inside specifically, the measured FPS data shows the RTX 5070 delivers far more than enough headroom, so any of these rivals would likely also clear the 60 FPS threshold at most settings, though the exact frame rates would differ based on driver optimizations and architectural differences.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, the combination achieves an average of 110.8 FPS on High settings, 225.5 FPS on Low, 180.8 FPS on Medium, and 107.2 FPS on Ultra. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: The highest preset tested at 1920x1080 is Ultra, which delivers an average of 238.8 FPS. Since this is well above the 60 FPS threshold and is the most demanding preset in the dataset, the system can run the game at maximum fidelity with substantial headroom.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35287. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T, scores 35305, which is only 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (0.3% higher). These differences are negligible for gaming performance.

Q: Is there any resolution or setting where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. The lowest average frame rate recorded across all tests is 107.2 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. Every other configuration produces higher average frame rates, so the system never approaches the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark percentile compare to the CPU’s?

A: The GPU ranks in the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards, while the CPU ranks in the 84th percentile among all processors. Both components are in the top fifth of their respective categories, indicating a balanced high-end pairing.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system produces an average of 286.6 FPS. This is more than four times the playability threshold, indicating the GPU is not heavily stressed at this resolution and preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 369.7 FPS on Low settings, 338.6 FPS on Medium, 248 FPS on High, and 238.8 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 130.9 FPS (369.7 minus 238.8), showing that while settings do impact performance, even the most demanding preset at 1080p leaves enormous headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages remain exceptionally high: 326.5 FPS on Low, 286.6 FPS on Medium, 175.5 FPS on High, and 171.1 FPS on Ultra. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 11-12% at Low settings (369.7 to 326.5) and by about 29% at Ultra settings (238.8 to 171.1). This indicates the GPU scales well with resolution, though the higher preset settings create a larger performance gap at higher resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the system still performs admirably: 225.5 FPS on Low, 180.8 FPS on Medium, 110.8 FPS on High, and 107.2 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K is substantial — approximately 31% at Low settings (326.5 to 225.5) and 37% at Ultra settings (171.1 to 107.2). Even at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold, meaning there is no scenario in the dataset where the system struggles to maintain playability. Notably, the difference between High and Ultra at each resolution is small: 3.6 FPS at 4K (110.8 vs 107.2), 4.4 FPS at 1440p (175.5 vs 171.1), and 9.2 FPS at 1080p (248 vs 238.8). This suggests Ultra settings are nearly free in terms of performance cost.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3716 tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database for Inside, this pairing ranks 484th. This places it in the top 13% of all tested configurations, which is consistent with the individual component percentiles (84th for CPU, 82nd for GPU). The rank reflects that while this is a strong setup, there are 483 combinations that achieve higher average frame rates in this specific game, likely featuring more powerful processors and graphics cards. However, the practical significance of this ranking is limited by the fact that the game is not particularly demanding — the lowest recorded average FPS for this combo is 107.2, which is still nearly 80% above the playability threshold. The rank of 484 out of 3716 suggests that for most users, the difference between this combo and higher-ranked ones would be imperceptible at typical refresh rates, since both would vastly exceed 60 FPS in all scenarios.

The Verdict

This system can run Inside with outstanding performance at every resolution and preset combination included in the dataset. The verdict by resolution confirms that 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 all have playable settings that include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. The best settings at each resolution are the most demanding presets: Ultra at 4K with an average of 107.2 FPS, Ultra at 1440p with an average of 171.1 FPS, and Ultra at 1080p with an average of 238.8 FPS. Since the playable threshold is 60 FPS and the lowest average is 107.2 FPS, there is no configuration in the data that fails to meet the threshold. The system is capable of running the game at maximum quality at 4K with nearly double the required frame rate, making it an excellent pairing for this title. The CPU’s 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample processing power, while the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure smooth texture streaming and rendering at high resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, delivering an average of 107.2 FPS. This is the optimal choice for 4K gaming, providing the highest visual fidelity while maintaining a comfortable margin above the playability threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, achieving an average of 171.1 FPS — more than 2.8 times the threshold, so users could even consider enabling additional enhancements without fear of dropping below 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra produces an average of 238.8 FPS, which is nearly four times the threshold. In all three resolutions, the data indicates that the most demanding preset tested is still far from stressing the system to its limits. The consistent pattern — where Ultra is always the recommended setting — underscores that this hardware combination is overqualified for Inside, offering substantial performance headroom that could accommodate future patches, background tasks, or higher refresh rate displays. For users with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors, the 1080p and 1440p results are particularly relevant, as the system can drive Ultra settings well beyond 144 FPS at both resolutions.