Inside

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer title from 2016. Benchmark data confirms that this pairing not only meets but vastly exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The measured frame rates indicate a system with immense headroom, making it a definitive choice for high-refresh-rate displays and maximum graphical fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS at 3840x2160 resolution?

A: The Ultra preset at 4K delivers an average of 97.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. This is the most demanding setting tested, and it remains fully playable.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core i7-12700K's average benchmark score of 35287 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i5-13600T, which scores 35305, a delta of -0.1%. The data shows the i7-12700K is also 0.2% behind the i7-12700KF (35365) and 0.3% behind the i7-13700T (35403).

Q: What is the performance gap between the RTX 3080 Ti and its closest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti's average benchmark score of 41187 is 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870). Conversely, it is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707) and 1.7% behind the standard Tesla M40 (41897).

Q: At 2560x1440 resolution, what is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings?

A: The average frame rate drops from 327.9 FPS on Low to 156.1 FPS on Ultra. This represents a significant reduction of 171.8 FPS, yet the Ultra setting still maintains a frame rate more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the benchmark data suggest the CPU is a bottleneck for this game at 1920x1080?

A: No. At 1080p, the lowest average frame rate recorded is 217.4 FPS on Ultra settings. Since even the most demanding preset yields such high numbers, the data implies the CPU is not limiting performance; the game is likely GPU-bound, and even then, the RTX 3080 Ti has substantial headroom.

Q: What is the rank of this CPU and GPU combination among all tested combos for Inside?

A: The combo ranks 711th out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the top 20% of all configurations tested, indicating a high-performance tier for this specific game.

How This Combo Ranks

The data positions the Core i7-12700K and RTX 3080 Ti pairing in the 711th spot out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This percentile placement is remarkably strong, suggesting that this hardware configuration outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database for this specific title. The rank reflects the raw power of both components, even when considering the game's release date.

The rank becomes more meaningful when examining the actual frame rates. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves a minimum of 217.4 FPS on Ultra settings. This is not merely a playable result; it is a result that would support a 144Hz or even a 240Hz monitor without dropping below the refresh rate in average terms. The 4K Ultra result of 97.1 FPS also places the combo in a performance tier that many systems cannot reach, reinforcing its high rank.

The gap between this combo and the 60 FPS threshold is substantial across all resolutions. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 156.1 FPS, which is 96.1 FPS above the playable threshold. This headroom indicates that the system is not struggling to render the game; it is operating well within its capabilities. The rank of 711 reflects this comfort, as many lower-ranked combos might only just clear the threshold or fail to do so at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in average benchmark score are all Intel parts. The Intel Core i5-13600T (35305) is the closest, with a negligible delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365) and Intel Core i7-13700T (35403) are also within a 0.3% performance envelope. In practical terms for Inside, these CPUs would yield nearly identical frame rates, meaning users with any of these processors would see the same performance class.

The GPU's nearest rivals present a more diverse set of alternatives. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870) is 0.8% slower, while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707) and NVIDIA Tesla M40 (41897) are 1.2% and 1.7% faster, respectively. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377) is 2% slower. For Inside, these deltas are so small that they would translate to a difference of only a few frames per second. A user with a Tesla M40 24 GB might see a marginal increase in average FPS, but the experience would be visually identical.

These rivals suggest that the RTX 3080 Ti is in a performance tier where minor score differences do not affect the playability of Inside. Since even the slowest rival (RTX 5070) would still likely exceed 60 FPS at 4K, the choice between these GPUs would not be a deciding factor for this game. The data shows that the CPU and GPU are both in a sweet spot where the game's requirements are easily satisfied.

The Verdict

The benchmark data unequivocally answers the question: yes, this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at every resolution from 1920x1080 up to 3840x2160. The system does not just meet the 60 FPS threshold; it obliterates it.

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 97.1 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it still provides a 37.1 FPS buffer above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 156.1 FPS, and at 1920x1080, it reaches 217.4 FPS. The data indicates that this combo is overkill for the game, providing performance that is suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at any resolution.

The conclusion is straightforward: users can max out every graphical setting in Inside and still enjoy a fluid experience. The frame rates are so high that the limiting factor becomes the display's refresh rate, not the hardware. This system is a top-tier performer for this title, and the measured data confirms it delivers a flawless experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals the performance dynamics. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (366.9 FPS) and Ultra (217.4 FPS) is 149.5 FPS. This large delta suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of performance, as increasing the graphical workload significantly impacts frame rates. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at this resolution, so the GPU's capabilities dictate the output.

At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (206 FPS) and Ultra (97.1 FPS) is 108.9 FPS. While still substantial, the relative drop from Low to Ultra is less pronounced at 4K than at 1080p. This indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is even more saturated, and the CPU's role diminishes further. The data shows that the GPU is the dominant component across all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient support to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K on Ultra settings shows a drop from 217.4 FPS to 97.1 FPS, a reduction of 120.3 FPS. This is a direct consequence of the increased pixel count, which places a heavier load on the GPU. The CPU's workload does not scale with resolution in the same way, confirming that the RTX 3080 Ti is the component that determines the final frame rate. For Inside, the GPU is the critical piece, and the i7-12700K is more than adequate to keep up.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for each resolution to maximize visual quality while maintaining an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is Ultra, which delivers an average of 97.1 FPS. This is the highest quality preset tested and it still provides a significant margin above the playable threshold. There is no need to compromise on visual fidelity at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 156.1 FPS. This frame rate is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, offering a very smooth experience on high-refresh-rate displays.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 217.4 FPS. This result is exceptionally high, making it ideal for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming where frame rates above 200 FPS are desirable.

In every case, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice. The benchmark results indicate that the hardware has enough performance to run the game at its maximum settings without any risk of dropping below 60 FPS on average.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|:--------- |:------- |:---------- |

| 3840x2160 | High | 101.6 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 206.0 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 164.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 97.1 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 166.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 327.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 261.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 156.1 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 232.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 366.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 340.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 217.4 |

The data shows a consistent pattern: higher resolutions and higher settings reduce frame rates, but the minimum recorded average is still 97.1 FPS at 4K Ultra. The scaling is smooth, with no anomalies indicating a driver or game-specific issue. The performance is consistently high across the board, confirming the robustness of this hardware combination for Inside.