Inside

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 pairing was tested in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer released on 2016-07-06. The database contains measured average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, each with Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded, so this report is based on average FPS. The playable threshold for this benchmark is 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Inside at 3840x2160 with the highest preset?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the measured average FPS is 109.5, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data lists Ultra as the best setting at this resolution.

Q: What are the measured averages at 1920x1080?

A: Low averages 392.1 FPS, Medium averages 357.9 FPS, High averages 246 FPS, and Ultra averages 238.4 FPS. Every preset clears 60 FPS by a large margin.

Q: How close are the CPU's nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388.

Q: How close are the GPU's nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40,377. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100, 1.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, and 2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile.

Q: Does lowering settings produce a large FPS gain?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, Low averages 224.1 FPS versus 109.5 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, Low is 351.3 FPS and Ultra is 172.7 FPS. At 1920x1080, Low is 392.1 FPS and Ultra is 238.4 FPS. Even so, Ultra is already above 60 FPS at every tested resolution.

Q: Where does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: It is ranked 419th out of 3,716 tested combos for Inside.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS table does not separate CPU time from GPU time, but the shape of the results offers clues about which component matters more. At every resolution, the same preset loses FPS as resolution increases. For Ultra, the average goes from 238.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 172.7 FPS at 2560x1440 to 109.5 FPS at 3840x2160. This is the expected pattern for GPU workload scaling: higher resolution means more pixel work for the graphics card.

Preset scaling also points toward the GPU. At 1920x1080, Low is 392.1 FPS and Ultra is 238.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, Low is 351.3 FPS and Ultra is 172.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low is 224.1 FPS and Ultra is 109.5 FPS. The absolute gap between Low and Ultra is smaller at 3840x2160 than at 1920x1080, which suggests that at higher resolutions the GPU is already heavily loaded and the quality preset has a smaller absolute impact.

The CPU still matters, but it appears to have ample headroom for this game. The i5-14600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads, and its average benchmark score is 49,394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The RTX 5070 is in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 40,377. In a game where even the lowest preset at 1920x1080 reaches 392.1 FPS, the CPU is not the factor holding this combo back. The GPU becomes the more relevant variable as resolution climbs to 3840x2160.

Best Settings per Resolution

Because every measured preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, the most demanding preset is also the best setting at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 238.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 172.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 109.5 FPS. The verdictByResolution data confirms that High, Low, Medium, and Ultra are all listed as playable at every tested resolution. For players who want the highest image quality, Ultra is the clear choice. For players who prefer extra frame rate headroom, Low offers 392.1 FPS at 1920x1080, 351.3 FPS at 2560x1440, and 224.1 FPS at 3840x2160.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest CPU rivals by average benchmark score are all within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.3% slower than the i5-14600KF, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% slower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% faster. In CPU-bound scenarios, swapping the i5-14600KF for any of these chips should produce nearly identical FPS in Inside.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is 0.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100. It is 1.2% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and 2% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile. These deltas are small enough that the measured FPS for Inside would be very close across these GPUs, with the exact ranking depending on which component is the bottleneck at a given resolution and preset.

How This Combo Ranks

Inside's benchmark database ranks this CPU/GPU combination 419th out of 3,716 tested combos. That places it in the upper part of the field. It is also consistent with the component-level percentiles: the CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU sits in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. The combo's in-game rank is not simply an average of those two positions, but the high FPS at every resolution shows that this pairing is far more than enough for Inside.

The Verdict

Yes. The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 can run Inside at 60 FPS or higher at every resolution and preset tested. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 238.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 172.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 109.5 FPS. The playable settings list includes High, Low, Medium, and Ultra for each resolution, so no measured preset drops below the 60 FPS threshold. The only caveat is that minimum and maximum FPS were not reported, so this verdict is based on average FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All values below are average FPS from the measured dataset. Min and max FPS were null in the fact pack.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 112.5 | not reported | not reported |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 224.1 | not reported | not reported |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 178.9 | not reported | not reported |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 109.5 | not reported | not reported |

| 2560x1440 | High | 178.3 | not reported | not reported |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 351.3 | not reported | not reported |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 285.1 | not reported | not reported |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 172.7 | not reported | not reported |

| 1920x1080 | High | 246 | not reported | not reported |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 392.1 | not reported | not reported |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 357.9 | not reported | not reported |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 238.4 | not reported | not reported |