Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 58 | 63 | 103 | 126 |
| 1440p QHD | 98 | 103 | 161 | 203 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 139 | 223 | 283 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER holds position 2,624 out of 3,716 tested combinations in the database for Inside. This places the combo in the 71st percentile of all recorded system configurations, a solidly above-average standing for a game that is not particularly demanding by modern standards. The ranking reflects a combination where the CPU is exceptionally strong, sitting at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is more modest, landing at the 62nd percentile among all graphics cards. The pairing creates a system that is heavily weighted toward processor performance, which matters for a puzzle platformer that relies more on consistent frame pacing than on raw graphics throughput.
The recorded data shows that this combo outperforms the median tested system by a comfortable margin. In the context of the 3,716 combos tracked, being at 2,624 means roughly 71 percent of all tested configurations rank below it. This is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, but it is far from a weak one. The CPU's high percentile ranking compensates for the GPU's mid-range standing, resulting in a balanced overall position that handles the game's modest graphical requirements with significant headroom.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14600K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER becomes clear when examining the frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 282.8 FPS on Low settings, 223.3 FPS on Medium, 138.7 FPS on High, and 130.3 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 59.5 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 84.6 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra is only 8.4 FPS. This pattern suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the dominant factor at lower presets, where the GPU is not fully utilized, and the GPU becomes more relevant only at the higher presets where the frame rate begins to drop more sharply.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale to 203 FPS on Low, 160.7 FPS on Medium, 103.4 FPS on High, and 97.6 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of 79.8 FPS on Low, 62.6 FPS on Medium, 35.3 FPS on High, and 32.7 FPS on Ultra. The percentage drops are 28.2 percent for Low, 28 percent for Medium, 25.5 percent for High, and 25.1 percent for Ultra. These reductions are relatively uniform across presets, indicating that at 1440p, the GPU begins to share the load more evenly with the CPU, but the CPU still provides enough headroom to keep frame rates well above 60 FPS at every preset.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes more dramatically. The system records 125.9 FPS on Low, 102.9 FPS on Medium, 62.8 FPS on High, and 58.2 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows reductions of 77.1 FPS on Low, 57.8 FPS on Medium, 40.6 FPS on High, and 39.4 FPS on Ultra. The percentage drops are 38 percent for Low, 36 percent for Medium, 39.3 percent for High, and 40.4 percent for Ultra. Here, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, especially at High and Ultra, where the frame rates approach the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that at 4K, the RTX 2060 SUPER is the limiting factor, while the i5-14600K's processing power is largely idle, waiting on the GPU to deliver frames.
The overall pattern indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU matters more, as the GPU can handle the load without being saturated. At 4K, the GPU dominates the performance equation, and the CPU's influence diminishes. This is a typical scaling behavior for a game with modest graphics demands, where a strong processor can push very high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU eventually becomes the ceiling at higher pixel counts.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14600K, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with an average score of 48,698 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the AMD EPYC 4345P with a score of 48,470 and a delta of 0.3 percent, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX with a score of 48,287 and a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with a score of 48,995 and a delta of -0.8 percent. These processors are all within a narrow performance band, meaning that swapping the i5-14600K for any of these would result in nearly identical CPU-bound frame rates in Inside. The differences are so small that they would be imperceptible in actual gameplay, with all of them providing ample processing power for this title.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with an average score of 18,159 and a delta of -0.4 percent, the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with a score of 18,189 and a delta of -0.5 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 460 with a score of 18,373 and a delta of -1.5 percent, and the Intel Arc A770M with a score of 18,383 and a delta of -1.6 percent. These GPUs are extremely close in performance, with the RTX 3060 Mobile being nearly identical to the RTX 2060 SUPER. A user with any of these four graphics cards would experience essentially the same frame rates in Inside at every resolution and preset, assuming the CPU remains constant. The delta values are all under 2 percent, which is within the margin of measurement error for most benchmarks.
If a user were to swap the CPU for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, which is 0.8 percent faster in average score, the frame rates at 1080p Low might increase by a fraction of a frame, but the difference would be negligible. Similarly, using the AMD Radeon RX 460, which is 1.5 percent faster in GPU score, would yield a marginal improvement at 4K Ultra, but the frame rate would still hover near the 60 FPS boundary. The practical takeaway is that this combo sits in a dense cluster of similar-performing hardware, and small changes in component selection would not alter the playability verdict for Inside.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, the system can run Inside at 3840x2160 with High settings at 62.8 FPS on average. Low and Medium settings also clear the 60 FPS threshold, with 125.9 FPS and 102.9 FPS respectively. Ultra settings fall slightly below at 58.2 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?
A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 97.6 FPS on average, which is the highest preset that remains well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets, Low at 203 FPS, Medium at 160.7 FPS, High at 103.4 FPS, and Ultra at 97.6 FPS, are playable.
Q: How does the frame rate scale from 1080p to 4K?
A: At 1920x1080, the average frame rates range from 130.3 FPS on Ultra to 282.8 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the range is 97.6 FPS on Ultra to 203 FPS on Low. At 3840x2160, the range narrows to 58.2 FPS on Ultra to 125.9 FPS on Low. The scaling shows a reduction of roughly 25 to 40 percent when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 36 to 40 percent when moving from 1440p to 4K.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU has a larger influence, as the GPU is not fully saturated and the high single-thread performance of the i5-14600K allows for very high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, especially at High and Ultra presets, where the RTX 2060 SUPER approaches its performance ceiling.
Q: What is the playable threshold for this system?
A: The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS on average. At 4K, the system clears this at High, Medium, and Low settings. At 1440p and 1080p, all four presets, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, clear the threshold with significant margin.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested systems?
A: This combo ranks 2,624 out of 3,716 tested combinations in the database for Inside. This places it in the 71st percentile, meaning it outperforms the majority of recorded systems while not being among the top configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded measurements provide average frame rates across three resolutions and four settings presets. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not recorded in the database, so the analysis relies on average FPS values only.
At 1920x1080, the lowest average frame rate is 130.3 FPS on Ultra settings. The High preset delivers 138.7 FPS, Medium delivers 223.3 FPS, and Low delivers 282.8 FPS. The spread between the lowest and highest preset is 152.5 FPS, indicating that the GPU has substantial headroom at this resolution and the CPU is driving the upper end of the performance range.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates are 97.6 FPS on Ultra, 103.4 FPS on High, 160.7 FPS on Medium, and 203 FPS on Low. The spread from lowest to highest is 105.4 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces the Ultra preset by 32.7 FPS and the Low preset by 79.8 FPS, showing a more pronounced GPU impact at higher pixel counts.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop to 58.2 FPS on Ultra, 62.8 FPS on High, 102.9 FPS on Medium, and 125.9 FPS on Low. The spread from lowest to highest is 67.7 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, while High barely clears it at 62.8 FPS. The Medium and Low presets remain well above the threshold, but the GPU is clearly the performance limiter at this resolution.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings always deliver the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. The relative performance gap between Low and Ultra widens as resolution increases, from a 54 percent difference at 1080p to a 54 percent difference at 1440p and a 54 percent difference at 4K. The absolute gap narrows from 152.5 FPS at 1080p to 67.7 FPS at 4K, as the GPU becomes the dominant constraint.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers 130.3 FPS on average. This is the highest quality setting available, and the system has enough performance headroom to run it with a frame rate more than double the playable threshold. All presets are playable at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is also Ultra, delivering 97.6 FPS on average. The system clears the threshold by 37.6 FPS, providing a comfortable margin even at the highest quality setting. All four presets are playable at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers 62.8 FPS on average. This is a narrow margin of 2.8 FPS above the playable threshold. Ultra settings drop to 58.2 FPS and are not considered playable. Medium and Low settings are also playable, with 102.9 FPS and 125.9 FPS respectively, but High is the best visual quality option that maintains 60 FPS.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER can run Inside at all three tested resolutions, but the playable settings vary by resolution. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are playable at 130.3 FPS, and the system has enormous headroom. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are also playable at 97.6 FPS, again with a comfortable margin. At 3840x2160, the system can run High settings at 62.8 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, but Ultra settings fall short at 58.2 FPS.
The database verdict confirms that this combo is playable at 4K with High settings, and playable at 1440p and 1080p with Ultra settings. For users targeting 4K, the recommendation is to use High settings for the best visual quality that maintains a playable frame rate. For 1440p and 1080p, Ultra settings provide the full visual experience without any risk of dropping below 60 FPS. The system is well-suited for this game, with the CPU providing strong performance at lower resolutions and the GPU being sufficient for all but the most demanding 4K preset.