Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 75 | 82 | 125 | 161 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 127 | 203 | 254 |
| 1080p Full HD | 166 | 178 | 284 | 338 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a decisive performance margin for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. Benchmark data shows the combination ranks 1623rd out of 3716 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the upper half of all systems evaluated. The measured frame rates at every resolution and preset configuration far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the weakest recorded average still reaching 75.3 FPS at 4K Ultra settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest performance rivals, based on aggregate benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32,233 versus the i5-14400F's 32,279 average — a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900 trails by just 0.2% with a score of 32,226, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS leads by 0.2% at 32,354. The Intel Core i7-12800H completes the group at 32,121, sitting 0.5% behind. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Inside, since the game's puzzle-platformer nature rarely stresses CPU multi-threading to its limits.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5060's 26,331 average benchmark score places it alongside several unexpected competitors. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26,401, a 0.3% advantage, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 matches at 26,421 with the same 0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary posts 26,553, leading by 0.8%. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT falls 1.2% behind at 26,011. For Inside, these GPU alternatives would produce similar visual output, though the RTX 5060's modern architecture includes features like DirectX 12 Ultimate support that older cards may lack. The 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates this card sits above the median but not at the enthusiast tier.
How This Combo Ranks
With a rank of 1623 out of 3716 total combinations tested for Inside, this system lands in the 56th percentile of all pairings evaluated. This positioning reflects strong performance relative to the broader hardware landscape, though the game's modest graphical demands mean even mid-range components achieve high frame rates. The ranking is influenced by the fact that Inside uses a stylized 2.5D art style with limited polygon counts and simple lighting, making it far less demanding than contemporary AAA titles.
The measured data confirms this ranking is conservative relative to actual gameplay experience. At 1080p, the combo delivers between 165.7 and 337.8 FPS depending on settings, which places it in the top tier of systems capable of driving high-refresh-rate displays. The 4K results, ranging from 75.3 to 161 FPS, demonstrate that this configuration handles ultra-high resolutions without compromise, a feat many higher-ranked combos might struggle to match in more demanding titles.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 75.3 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin. All four tested settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — remain playable at 4K.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 121.7 FPS average, making it the highest quality option that maintains fluid performance. The other presets range from 127.2 FPS at High to 253.7 FPS at Low, all well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 5060 scores 26,331 on average benchmarks. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26,401 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26,421 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26,553 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26,011 (1.2% lower). These differences are minor enough to be imperceptible in Inside.
Q: What is the maximum frame rate achievable at 1080p?
A: The highest measured average at 1920x1080 is 337.8 FPS with Low settings. Medium settings yield 284.2 FPS, High produces 178 FPS, and Ultra still manages 165.7 FPS — all far beyond what most displays can refresh.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this game?
A: The data suggests the i5-14400F is not a limiting factor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and single-core score of 3,055 indicate substantial headroom. The 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with the game's low computational demands, means the processor easily keeps pace with the GPU at all resolutions.
Q: Does the system support modern graphics APIs?
A: Yes, the RTX 5060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with Inside's rendering requirements and future titles that leverage these APIs.
The Verdict
This system unequivocally runs Inside at maximum quality across every resolution tested. The verdict by resolution confirms all four settings presets are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average frame rates of 75.3 FPS at 4K, 121.7 FPS at 1440p, and 165.7 FPS at 1080p. The 60 FPS threshold is cleared by at least 15.3 FPS even in the most demanding configuration, and by 277.8 FPS in the least demanding scenario tested.
Players seeking the highest visual fidelity will find no reason to compromise. The game's artistic direction — characterized by moody lighting and atmospheric shadows — benefits from the Ultra preset's enhanced effects, and the hardware handles these without dropping below playable rates. For competitive or speedrunning purposes, the Low preset at 1080p offers 337.8 FPS, enabling the lowest input latency possible with this hardware combination.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear GPU-bound pattern. Moving from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra reduces average frame rate from 165.7 to 121.7 FPS, a 26.5% decrease. Further scaling to 4K Ultra drops performance to 75.3 FPS, a 38.1% reduction from the 1440p figure. This consistent degradation pattern indicates the RTX 5060 is the primary performance determinant at higher resolutions and quality settings.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 337.8 FPS, which requires the i5-14400F to feed frames at a rate exceeding 5.6 frames per second. The processor's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,470 provide ample capacity for this workload. Between Medium and Low settings at 1080p, the frame rate increases from 284.2 to 337.8 FPS, a 18.9% gain, while the resolution remains constant — this delta reflects reduced GPU workload rather than CPU limitations.
At 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes further. The difference between Low (161 FPS) and Ultra (75.3 FPS) settings is 85.7 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU's shading, texture, and post-processing workload dominates performance. The data indicates that for Inside, the RTX 5060 governs high-resolution performance, while the i5-14400F comfortably supports even the most extreme frame rates at lower resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset stands as the most demanding configuration that maintains 60 FPS, averaging 75.3 FPS. This leaves a 15.3 FPS margin above the playability threshold, providing headroom for scene complexity variations. Medium settings at 4K offer 124.7 FPS, while High reaches 81.6 FPS, but Ultra remains the optimal choice for visual quality without sacrificing playability.
For 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 121.7 FPS, more than double the 60 FPS threshold. This configuration provides a substantial safety buffer while enabling all visual features. The 1440p Ultra experience is notably smoother than 4K Ultra, with 46.4 FPS additional headroom, making it the sweet spot for players with high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 165.7 FPS, which is 105.7 FPS above the playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the recommended choice for esports-style play or for users with 144Hz displays seeking maximum responsiveness. The fact that even the most demanding settings at the most common resolution produce such high frame rates underscores the hardware's capability relative to the game's requirements.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete measured data set reveals consistent performance scaling across all configurations. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates progress from 75.3 FPS at Ultra to 81.6 FPS at High, 124.7 FPS at Medium, and 161 FPS at Low. The jump from High to Medium represents a 43.1 FPS improvement, indicating that High settings include disproportionately expensive visual effects for this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the measured averages are 121.7 FPS for Ultra, 127.2 FPS for High, 203 FPS for Medium, and 253.7 FPS for Low. The transition from High to Medium yields a 75.8 FPS gain, the largest single-setting delta across any resolution. This suggests High settings at 1440p impose significant GPU overhead relative to Medium.
The 1920x1080 results show 165.7 FPS at Ultra, 178 FPS at High, 284.2 FPS at Medium, and 337.8 FPS at Low. The difference between Low and Medium is 53.6 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 12.3 FPS. This compression at the top end indicates Ultra and High share many rendering features, with Ultra adding marginal enhancements that cost little performance at this resolution. Across all resolutions, the data shows no configuration falls below 75.3 FPS, confirming that this hardware combination provides a consistently excellent experience for Inside regardless of user preference for resolution or visual fidelity.