Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer that relies on moody lighting, precise physics, and a restrained art style rather than aggressive visual effects. The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 570 combination shows a system that can handle the game comfortably at standard resolutions, but the margin narrows quickly as resolution climbs. The measurements place this pairing at rank 3568 out of 3716 tested combos in the database, which suggests that while the hardware is capable, it sits near the lower end of the overall performance distribution for this title. The following analysis breaks down how this specific CPU and GPU work together across different settings and resolutions, what the data implies about component roles, and which configurations deliver a fluid experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14400F holds an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile relative to all CPUs in the database. Its closest rivals are tightly clustered around that figure. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U averages 32233, a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the two processors are effectively interchangeable in synthetic workloads. The Intel Core i9-11900 sits at 32226, also within 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS comes in slightly higher at 32354, which is a negative delta of 0.2 percent relative to the i5-14400F, indicating it edges ahead by a hair. The Intel Core i7-12800H trails by a small margin at 32121, a 0.5 percent difference. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Inside, since the game is not heavily multithreaded and the differences among these chips are within measurement noise.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 570 posts an average benchmark score of 28766, putting it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874, which is only 0.4 percent faster, a surprising result given the generational gap between these products. The AMD Radeon R9 M295X scores 28580, a 0.7 percent deficit. The AMD Radeon RX 470, a direct sibling in the same architecture family, reaches 28996, which is 0.8 percent higher. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000, a workstation card with a very different purpose, scores 28421, sitting 1.2 percent below the RX 570. For Inside, the RX 570 and these near-neighbor GPUs should produce comparable frame rates, with performance deltas small enough that settings changes would overshadow any hardware differences.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded FPS data reveals that Inside is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU has little influence on the outcome. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 138.2 FPS, which is high enough that the RX 570 is clearly the limiting factor. Dropping the CPU to a slower model would not change this result, as the i5-14400F is far more capable than the workload requires. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average falls to 26.6 FPS, a dramatic drop that points directly at the GPU struggling with the pixel fill rate and shading demands. The CPU remains idle relative to its capacity, so the scaling between resolutions is almost entirely attributable to the graphics card.

The transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Medium settings shows a drop from 106.1 FPS to 79.8 FPS, a reduction of roughly 25 percent. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at the same preset yields 50.2 FPS, another steep decline. These numbers indicate that each resolution step imposes a significant load on the GPU, and the CPU does not compensate at any point. At Low settings, the 1080p result of 138.2 FPS versus 96.7 FPS at 1440p demonstrates the same pattern. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing is irrelevant in this context; the RX 570's 74th percentile GPU score is the binding constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined rank of 3568 out of 3716 tested combos places this system in the bottom 4 percent of all configurations in the database for Inside. That sounds alarming, but the ranking includes every possible pairing tested, many of which feature far more powerful GPUs. The actual playability data tells a more nuanced story. At 1920x1080, all four tested settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, including Ultra at 62.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, Low and Medium are playable, with Medium reaching 79.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, no setting reaches 60 FPS, with the best result being Low at 58.9 FPS. So the low rank reflects the hardware's position in the broader database, not a failure to run the game. The combo is perfectly serviceable for 1080p and even 1440p gaming, but it is not a high-end pairing.

The percentile values reinforce this interpretation. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile, meaning it outperforms most processors in the database. The GPU sits at the 74th percentile, still above average. The combined rank of 3568 out of 3716 is dragged down by the fact that the database includes many combinations with top-tier GPUs paired with similar or better CPUs. For a game like Inside, which does not demand extreme hardware, this rank does not translate into an unplayable experience.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Inside, but the answer depends entirely on the chosen resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low through Ultra maintains an average above 60 FPS, so the game is fully playable with maximum visual quality. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium delivering 79.8 FPS, which is the best balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. At 3840x2160, no setting reaches 60 FPS; the closest is Low at 58.9 FPS, which falls just short of the playable threshold. The verdict by resolution in the database lists no playable settings for 4K, while 1440p supports Low and Medium, and 1080p supports all four tested presets. Players targeting 4K would need to accept a sub-60 experience or reduce resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RX 570 and i5-14400F deliver the following averages: Low settings produce 138.2 FPS, Medium produces 106.1 FPS, High produces 67.2 FPS, and Ultra produces 62.1 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is substantial, with Ultra dropping to less than half of the Low result. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not recorded in the database, so only the averages are available for analysis.

At 2560x1440, the results scale down smoothly: Low averages 96.7 FPS, Medium averages 79.8 FPS, High averages 51.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 43.9 FPS. The step from Medium to High is particularly steep, falling from 79.8 to 51.7, which crosses the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that the High preset introduces rendering features that the RX 570 cannot sustain at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overtaxed: Low averages 58.9 FPS, Medium averages 50.2 FPS, High averages 29.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 26.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 8.7 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 20.6 FPS, indicating that High adds a significant load. Ultra barely improves on High, suggesting that the GPU is already saturated.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Inside at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 62.1, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the highest playable preset, with an average of 79.8 FPS. High drops to 51.7 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: Is 3840x2160 playable with this hardware?

A: No, the database lists no playable settings at 4K. The best result is Low at 58.9 FPS, just short of 60.

Q: How does the RX 570 compare to the RX 470?

A: The RX 570 averages 28766 in benchmarks, while the RX 470 averages 28996, a difference of 0.8 percent in favor of the RX 470.

Q: How does the i5-14400F compare to the Ryzen 7 6800HS?

A: The i5-14400F averages 32279, while the Ryzen 7 6800HS averages 32354, a 0.2 percent difference in favor of the Ryzen chip.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average is 138.2 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 62.1 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality available in the tested data, and it remains playable. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, averaging 79.8 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin above the threshold while preserving higher detail than Low. At 3840x2160, no setting meets the 60 FPS requirement, so there is no recommended playable preset; the closest option is Low at 58.9 FPS, but that still falls short. For players who prioritize smoothness, sticking to 1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium is the clear path. The data shows that this combination is a reliable 1080p machine for Inside, a decent 1440p machine at medium detail, and not suitable for 4K at any tested preset.