Inside

# Can Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Run Inside?

The benchmark data for this Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing against Inside reveals a system with substantial headroom across all tested resolutions. The RTX 5050, scoring in the 66th percentile among all GPUs, pairs with a CPU in the 77th percentile to deliver frame rates that are never below 60 FPS at any resolution or setting tested. This is not a marginal pass; the lowest average frame rate recorded is 64 FPS at 4K Ultra settings, which is still above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data suggests a combination that handles this puzzle platformer with considerable performance to spare, making it a fit for high-refresh displays at 1080p and 1440p, and still fully playable at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 5050 and i5-13400F combination produces extremely high frame rates that exceed the needs of most displays. On Low settings, the average FPS reaches 296, which is nearly five times the playability threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 237 FPS, with a minimum of 201 FPS and a maximum of 272 FPS. This min-max spread shows consistency, as the minimum stays well above 200 FPS. High settings deliver an average of 148 FPS, while Ultra settings still produce an average of 141 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is interesting: the difference between Low and Ultra is 155 FPS, a 52% reduction, yet even the most demanding preset remains more than double the 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally strong. Low settings yield an average of 213 FPS, which is still a high refresh rate experience. The Medium preset averages 170 FPS, with a minimum of 145 FPS and a maximum of 196 FPS, indicating that even the lowest recorded frame in this setting clears the playable threshold by a wide margin. High settings produce an average of 106 FPS, and Ultra settings average 101 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 112 FPS, a similar proportional drop to 1080p, but the absolute numbers remain high. This resolution appears to be the sweet spot, as Ultra settings still deliver triple-digit frame rates, giving the user plenty of performance for a 144Hz monitor.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve becomes more demanding, but the system still holds above 60 FPS. Low settings average 134 FPS, which is an excellent result for 4K. Medium settings average 107 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS. The minimum at 4K Medium is still comfortably above 60 FPS, showing that there is no risk of dipping below playable levels in typical scenes. High settings average 67 FPS, and Ultra settings average 64 FPS. The transition from Medium to High at 4K causes a substantial drop of 40 FPS, which suggests that the higher presets at this resolution are approaching the limits of the GPU. However, even at Ultra, the average of 64 FPS clears the threshold, making 4K gaming viable on this hardware.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-13400F, based on average benchmark scores, provide context for the CPU's performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS has an average score of 25284, a delta of 0% from the i5-13400F, indicating essentially identical performance. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both score 25362 and 25365 respectively, with a delta of -0.3%, meaning they are marginally slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a delta of 0.4%, putting it slightly ahead. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside, as the game is not likely to be CPU-bound at the tested settings.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, the nearest rivals show a tight grouping. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL has an average score of 21153, a delta of -0.6%, meaning it is slightly slower. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, a delta of -1%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, a delta of -1.6%, both also slightly slower. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, a delta of 1.6%, making it the fastest of the group. A system with an RX 5600 XT and a comparable CPU would likely deliver FPS numbers within a couple of percent of the i5-13400F and RTX 5050 combination. The differences among these rivals are small enough that the gaming experience in Inside would be indistinguishable in terms of playability.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, the benchmark data shows that at 3840x2160, all tested settings from Low to Ultra maintain average FPS above 60. The lowest average is 64 FPS at Ultra settings, with Low settings reaching 134 FPS.

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is playable, delivering an average of 101 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and it is the most demanding setting available.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, placing it in the 66th percentile. It is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, and it is slightly slower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, AMD Radeon HD 8970M, and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by margins of 0.6% to 1.6%.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1080p Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with the Medium preset, the minimum FPS is 201, with an average of 237 FPS and a maximum of 272 FPS. This indicates the system never drops below 200 FPS in this configuration.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this game?

A: The i5-13400F scores in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, show a 0% delta in performance. The FPS numbers across resolutions and settings show that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rates scale with resolution changes.

Q: Does the frame rate at 4K Ultra stay above 60 FPS?

A: Yes, the average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data does not list a minimum FPS for this setting, but the average suggests it is playable.

The Verdict

The benchmark results clearly answer whether this PC can run Inside: it can, and with significant margin. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four settings at each resolution are playable, as the average FPS at every configuration is above 60. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 141 FPS, making it not just playable but suitable for high refresh rate displays. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 101 FPS, again providing a smooth experience. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 64 FPS, which is a pass, but it is the only configuration where the system is not far above the threshold. The 4K High and Ultra settings, with averages of 67 and 64 FPS respectively, leave little room for demanding scenes, but they remain playable. For users with 1080p or 1440p monitors, this system offers excellent performance that will easily handle the game's puzzle platformer mechanics without any frame rate concerns.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 141 FPS. This is the highest setting available, and the system clears the threshold by more than double. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, averaging 101 FPS. This provides a high quality visual experience while maintaining a frame rate that is well suited for most displays. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is again the most demanding playable option, with an average of 64 FPS. This is a narrow margin, but it is above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that at 4K, the Medium preset offers a more comfortable average of 107 FPS, but since Ultra is still playable, it is listed as the best setting. For users who prefer a more consistent frame rate at 4K, dropping to Medium would provide a substantial buffer.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2247 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in roughly the 60th percentile of all tested systems. The ranking is a reflection of the overall performance, which is sufficient for high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and playable at 4K. The percentile of the individual components, 77th for the CPU and 66th for the GPU, indicates that the system is above average, but not at the top tier. The rank of 2247 suggests that a significant number of tested combos deliver higher FPS, likely with more powerful GPUs, but this does not detract from the fact that this system meets the playability criteria at all resolutions. The data shows that the combo is more than capable for this game, even if it does not lead the chart.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data across resolutions and presets reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU in Inside. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary driver of performance, as the FPS drops from 296 on Low to 141 on Ultra, a change of 155 FPS. This is a direct result of the GPU working harder at higher presets. The CPU, with a high single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23, is likely not the limiting factor at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds: the GPU's workload increases with resolution, and the FPS drops from 213 on Low to 101 on Ultra. The CPU's performance remains constant, but the GPU's output decreases as it processes more pixels.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes even more pronounced. The FPS at 4K Low is 134, which is less than half of the 296 FPS at 1080p Low. This halving of frame rates as resolution increases is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's contribution is relatively static across resolutions, as it is not tasked with more work at higher resolutions. The scaling between resolutions and presets shows that the RTX 5050 is the bottleneck, and the i5-13400F provides ample support. The difference between the 4K Ultra average of 64 FPS and the 1080p Ultra average of 141 FPS highlights the GPU's dominance in determining frame rates, while the CPU maintains a consistent level of performance throughout.