Inside

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a high-end desktop combination that delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer. Measured benchmark data shows this combo achieves well above the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested setting and resolution, from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra. The following analysis breaks down the pairing's capabilities, ranking, and optimal configurations based strictly on the provided data.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, completely. At 3840x2160, the combo achieves an average of 122 FPS on High settings and 116 FPS on Ultra settings. Even the most demanding preset at 4K clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 184 FPS. This is more than three times the 60 FPS threshold, so there is no need to drop to a lower preset for smoother gameplay.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Inside?*

A: The combo ranks 486th out of 3716 tested configurations, placing it in the top 13.1% of all systems tested for this specific game.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The data shows the GPU is the primary driver. At 1920x1080, the frame rate increases from 252 FPS at Ultra to 333 FPS at Low, a 32% jump purely from reducing graphics load. This scaling pattern indicates the graphics card is the limiting factor, not the processor.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only minimum FPS values recorded are 166 FPS at 4K Medium, 234 FPS at 1440p Medium, and 261 FPS at 1080p Medium. All of these minimums are far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 5090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 5090 Mobile's score of 45152. In practical terms, these two GPUs perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.

How This Combo Ranks

In the tested database of 3716 system combinations for Inside, this Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti pairing holds the 486th position. This ranking places the combo comfortably in the top 13% of all systems tested, indicating it is a high-performance configuration for this title. The percentile data reinforces this: the CPU sits in the 77th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 84th percentile against all GPUs.

The combination's strength comes from both components being well above average. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25292 puts it in the 77th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all processors tested. The GPU's average score of 44795 puts it in the 84th percentile, outperforming over four-fifths of all graphics cards. When paired together, these above-average components create a system that ranks in the top 486 of 3716, a strong showing for a game that is not particularly demanding by modern standards.

The rank is somewhat surprising given the raw power of the components. Inside is a 2D puzzle platformer from 2016, so the 486th rank out of 3716 suggests that while this combo is fast, there are many other systems that also perform at or near the maximum frame rates this game can deliver. The data shows the game is easily handled, and the rank primarily reflects that many other high-end combos also achieve very high frame rates, crowding the top of the leaderboard.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant factor in determining frame rates for Inside, with the CPU playing a supporting role at lower resolutions. This is evident from the scaling between presets at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 81 FPS (333 vs 252 FPS). This 32% performance gap is entirely attributable to the graphics card's workload, as the CPU is likely not stressed at this resolution. The GPU's role becomes even more pronounced at 4K: the gap between Low (243 FPS) and Ultra (116 FPS) is 127 FPS, a 109% difference. This is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario, where higher resolutions and presets place increasing demands on the graphics card.

The CPU's contribution is less visible but still important. The i5-13400F's 16 threads and 10 cores provide ample processing power for the game's logic and physics. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 333 FPS, which is likely near the engine's maximum frame rate cap or the CPU's ability to feed the GPU. If the CPU were a bottleneck, the frame rate would plateau regardless of resolution, but the data shows a clear drop from 333 FPS at 1080p Low to 243 FPS at 4K Low, proving the GPU is the limiting factor.

At 1440p, the pattern continues. The Ultra preset delivers 184 FPS, while Low delivers 298 FPS, a 114 FPS spread. The medium preset's minimum FPS of 234 at 1440p is also noteworthy, as it shows the system maintains high frame rates even during demanding scenes. The CPU's role is to ensure the GPU is fed with enough data to sustain these high frame rates, and the 16-thread processor accomplishes this without becoming a bottleneck at any resolution or preset.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Inside, and it does so with extraordinary headroom. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 116 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra delivering 184 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset exceeds 250 FPS, with Ultra achieving 252 FPS.

The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and this combo exceeds it by at least 56 FPS at the most demanding setting (4K Ultra) and by at least 192 FPS at the least demanding setting (1080p Low). The minimum FPS values recorded are also far above the threshold: 166 FPS at 4K Medium, 234 FPS at 1440p Medium, and 261 FPS at 1080p Medium. There is no scenario in the data where this combo drops below 116 FPS average, which means the game will run smoothly on any modern display, including high-refresh-rate monitors.

For a game like Inside, which relies on atmospheric visuals and precise platforming, the ability to run at 4K Ultra with 116 FPS average is a definitive pass. Players with 144Hz monitors at 1440p can take full advantage of the display's refresh rate with the Ultra preset at 184 FPS. Even at 4K, the 116 FPS average at Ultra is sufficient for a smooth experience on most displays, and dropping to High would yield 122 FPS with no visual sacrifice noticeable in a game of this style.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores are all within a fraction of a percent of the i5-13400F's 25292 average score. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS matches at 25284 (0% difference), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (+0.4%). Any of these processors would deliver essentially identical performance in Inside, as the game is not CPU-intensive at the tested settings.

For the GPU, the RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals show similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152 (-0.8% vs 44795), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 (-1.3%), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075 (+1.6%), and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592 (-1.7%). These GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside, with the RTX A6000 being slightly slower and the Arc A730M slightly faster in synthetic benchmarks.

It is important to note that the RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals include a mix of mobile and workstation parts. The RTX 5090 Mobile and Arc A730M are laptop components, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT and RTX A6000 are professional workstation cards. In a desktop gaming context, the RTX 4070 Ti is the most suitable consumer option, but the data shows that these alternatives would perform at a similar level in this specific game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, delivering an average of 252 FPS. This is the most demanding preset, and it still provides over four times the 60 FPS playable threshold. There is no reason to lower the settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves massive performance headroom.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is again the best choice, achieving an average of 184 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The High preset would deliver 194 FPS, but the difference is marginal and the visual quality of Ultra is worth the small performance cost.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains the best option with an average of 116 FPS. This is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring a fluid experience on 4K displays. The High preset offers 122 FPS, but Ultra's 116 FPS is still well above the playable threshold, so the maximum visual quality is recommended. The data confirms that this combo can handle the most demanding settings at every resolution without dropping below 60 FPS.