Inside

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 delivers a robust experience in Inside, a side-scrolling puzzle platformer that is not particularly demanding on modern hardware. The recorded data shows that this combination is more than capable of handling the game’s artistic visuals at high frame rates, with the primary limitation appearing at 4K resolution with higher presets. The database places this pairing at rank 3091 out of 3716 tested combos for this title, indicating that while it is not at the top of the charts, it sits comfortably within the bounds of playable configurations. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance across resolutions, compares the hardware to near-equivalent alternatives, and provides concrete settings recommendations based on the observed data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for Inside with this CPU and GPU combination are recorded at three resolutions and four quality presets. All values are average frames per second, as the database does not list minimum or maximum frame rate data for this title.

At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high across all settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 230.9 FPS, while the Medium preset reaches 181.8 FPS. High settings produce 116.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration, still maintains an average of 110.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a drop of roughly 52%, but even the lowest figure remains far above any playability concern, as the game never dips below the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the expected reduction from the higher pixel count. The Low preset averages 166.1 FPS, and Medium reaches 132.6 FPS. High settings record 83.4 FPS, while Ultra drops to 79.3 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is relatively small, with only a 4.1 FPS difference, suggesting that the visual upgrade from Ultra does not impose a significant penalty at this resolution. All presets remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making 1440p a fully viable option for this game.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K rendering begin to constrain the hardware. The Low preset still achieves a respectable 106.4 FPS, and Medium comes in at 80.5 FPS. However, High settings fall to 50.5 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 48.3 FPS. These latter two figures fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold, indicating that the GTX 1070’s 8 GB frame buffer and memory bandwidth are insufficient for the highest quality presets at this resolution. The difference between Low and Medium is 25.9 FPS, while the drop from Medium to High is 30.0 FPS, showing a steep penalty for enabling High settings at 4K.

The data indicates a clear pattern: at 1080p and 1440p, the user can freely select any preset and retain a smooth experience, while at 4K, the choice is limited to Low or Medium. The average FPS figures are consistent across all recorded runs, with no minimum or maximum values available to assess frame time variance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU, allowing for an assessment of what other hardware would behave similarly in this configuration.

For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the closest matching processors in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, which scores a delta of 0 percent relative to the i5-13400F, and the Intel Core 5 120, which trails by 0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D also sits at a 0.3 percent deficit, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is ahead by 0.4 percent. These rivals share a similar synthetic performance envelope, meaning that swapping the i5-13400F for any of these chips would likely produce near-identical frame rates in Inside, given that the game’s CPU load is modest and the GPU typically becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

For the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, the nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5000, which is 0.2 percent slower, the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M at 0.5 percent slower, the NVIDIA Tesla M10 at 0.6 percent faster, and the NVIDIA Tesla C2070 at 0.7 percent faster. These professional-grade cards, while not identical in architecture or feature set, exhibit similar compute performance in the database’s aggregate scoring. In practice, a system with the GTX 1070 replaced by one of these alternatives would deliver comparable average FPS in Inside, though the gaming-specific driver optimizations of the GTX 1070 may provide a small real-world advantage that synthetic scores do not fully capture.

The practical takeaway is that this CPU and GPU pairing behaves like a mid-range 2023 processor combined with a 2016-era upper-midrange graphics card. Users with hardware in this performance tier should expect consistent results in Inside, with the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rate at 4K and the CPU providing ample headroom at lower resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Inside shifts depending on the resolution and preset selected. The data provides clear evidence of where the bottleneck resides.

At 1920x1080, the CPU is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, as frame rates reach as high as 230.9 FPS on Low settings. The GTX 1070 is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the steady decline in FPS as the preset quality increases. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 120.7 FPS, a reduction that is entirely attributable to the GPU’s rasterization and memory bandwidth limits. The i5-13400F’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, are never stressed by a game of this complexity.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds, but the GPU’s load increases. The Low preset produces 166.1 FPS, which is 64.8 FPS lower than at 1080p, showing that the additional pixels consume GPU resources directly. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 79.3 FPS, a 30.9 FPS reduction from the 1080p Ultra figure. These scaling trends confirm that the GTX 1070 is the dominant factor at this resolution, while the CPU continues to operate well below its limits.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes critically constrained. The CPU’s role is largely irrelevant beyond a baseline level, as the frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the GTX 1070’s ability to process 8.3 million pixels per frame. The Low preset at 4K achieves 106.4 FPS, which is 59.7 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 48.3 FPS, which is 61.9 FPS below the 1080p Ultra result. This consistent gap across presets indicates that the GPU is saturated, and any further CPU performance gains would not translate into higher frame rates at this resolution.

The CPU’s contribution is most apparent in the consistency of frame rates at lower resolutions. The i5-13400F’s high single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 ensures that nothing in the game’s logic or physics engine becomes a bottleneck, even when the GPU is producing over 200 FPS. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rate monitors, this CPU provides the necessary headroom, while the GTX 1070 remains the component to upgrade for better 4K performance.

FAQ

*Q: Can the Intel Core i5-13400F and GTX 1070 run Inside at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average of 110.2 FPS at 1080p with the Ultra preset, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 3840x2160 resolution?

A: The Medium preset is the highest quality option that remains playable, with an average of 80.5 FPS. High and Ultra settings at 4K fall to 50.5 FPS and 48.3 FPS, respectively, which are below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 2560x1440?

A: The Low preset at 1440p averages 166.1 FPS, while Ultra averages 79.3 FPS. This represents a performance difference of 86.8 FPS, or about 109 percent higher frame rate on Low.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate scales significantly with preset quality, dropping from 230.9 FPS on Low to 110.2 FPS on Ultra, while the CPU has ample headroom to handle the game’s processing demands.

Q: Does the GTX 1070’s 8 GB memory capacity affect performance at 4K?

A: The data indicates that the GPU cannot maintain 60 FPS on High or Ultra at 4K, with averages of 50.5 FPS and 48.3 FPS. While the memory capacity is sufficient for 4K textures, the overall GPU throughput is the limiting factor.

Q: What similar CPUs would perform the same as the i5-13400F in this game?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Intel Core 5 120, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H all have average benchmark scores within 0.4 percent of the i5-13400F, indicating nearly identical CPU performance in a game like Inside.

How This Combo Ranks

The database assigns this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 a rank of 3091 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the lower portion of the overall distribution, which is primarily due to the age of the GPU. The GTX 1070, released in 2016 and now end-of-life, sits at the 47th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the i5-13400F is in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The pairing of a strong modern processor with an older mid-range graphics card results in a configuration that is held back by the GPU.

In the context of this game, the rank is less indicative of poor playability and more reflective of the hardware’s relative position among all tested systems. Inside is a lightweight title, so even a combination ranked in the lower half of the database can easily exceed the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p. The rank of 3091 suggests that a large number of tested combos feature newer or higher-tier GPUs, but the actual gameplay experience is smooth and responsive.

Users considering this combo should note that the CPU is not the constraint. The i5-13400F’s performance is comparable to much newer processors, and its benchmark scores place it in the top quarter of all CPUs. The GPU, however, is a legacy component that limits the maximum settings at 4K. Upgrading the graphics card to a newer model would improve the combo’s rank substantially, while keeping the same CPU would likely yield a higher position in the database.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database’s playability threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that remains at or above this average frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best option, with an average of 110.2 FPS. All four presets are playable, and the user can choose any quality level without concern. The margin between Ultra and the threshold is 50.2 FPS, providing ample headroom for any scene complexity that might cause temporary dips.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again qualifies as the best setting, with an average of 79.3 FPS. This is 19.3 FPS above the threshold, making it a comfortable choice. High settings are also viable at 83.4 FPS, but Ultra offers the highest visual fidelity while still remaining playable.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best setting that meets the playability criterion, with an average of 80.5 FPS. The Low preset is also playable at 106.4 FPS, but Medium provides superior visuals while still maintaining a 20.5 FPS margin over the threshold. High and Ultra are not recommended at this resolution, as their averages of 50.5 FPS and 48.3 FPS fall below 60 FPS, which may result in noticeable stutter during fast-moving scenes.

For users prioritizing frame rate over visual quality, the Low preset at 4K delivers the highest average at 106.4 FPS, but the Medium preset strikes the optimal balance between image quality and performance. At 1080p and 1440p, the Ultra preset is the definitive recommendation, as the hardware has sufficient performance to run the game at its highest settings without dropping below the playability threshold.