Inside

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-12600KF sits in a tight cluster of comparable processors according to aggregate benchmark data. Its average benchmark score of 27,799 places it within a fraction of a percent of several well-known chips. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27,896, a delta of only -0.3% — meaning the i5-12600KF trails by less than a third of a percent. The Intel Core i9-10900K posts a nearly identical 27,872, also -0.3% relative to the i5. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27,712, putting the i5 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U matches at 27,887, again -0.3%. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable performance in most games, including Inside. The i5-12600KF's 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with its Alder Lake architecture, place it in the 79th percentile among all CPUs — a strong but not top-tier position.

For the graphics side, the Intel Arc B580 shows an average benchmark score of 23,021, which lands it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23,061, a delta of -0.2% — essentially a tie. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22,895, putting the Arc B580 0.6% ahead. The RTX 3080 posts 23,172, meaning the B580 trails by 0.7%. The NVIDIA P106-100 reaches 23,249, with the B580 1% behind. What this means for Inside is that the Arc B580 behaves like a mid-range card from several generations ago — capable of high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but not a top-tier performer. The B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus provide 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for a game of Inside's visual complexity.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B580 maintain 60 FPS at 4K in Inside?

A: Yes, at High settings the combo averages 62.3 FPS at 3840x2160, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings reach 124.8 FPS, and Medium achieves 95.1 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 57.8 FPS, just below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best visual preset at 1440p for this combo?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings run at 92.5 FPS average, which is well above 60 FPS. This makes Ultra the best choice at that resolution, as it delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in raw benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580 scores 23,021 in average benchmark results, while the RTX 2080 scores 22,895. The B580 is 0.6% ahead of the RTX 2080, making them effectively equivalent in overall GPU performance.

Q: Is the i5-12600KF a bottleneck for the Arc B580 in Inside?

A: The data does not indicate any bottleneck. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,799 places it in the 79th percentile, and the measured FPS results at all resolutions and presets show no sign of CPU limitation. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with GPU-bound behavior.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo averages 213.2 FPS. This is far above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating the game runs extremely smoothly at this resolution.

Q: Does the combo rank highly among all tested systems for Inside?

A: The combo ranks 2,811 out of 3,716 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the overall distribution. This is due to the game's relatively modest hardware requirements rather than any deficiency in the components.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality presets each, with average frame rates recorded. No minimum or maximum FPS values were captured, so the analysis relies on averages alone.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers 124.8 FPS. Moving to Medium drops the average to 95.1 FPS, a reduction of roughly 24%. High settings further reduce performance to 62.3 FPS, a 35% drop from Medium. Ultra settings yield 57.8 FPS, which is 7% below High and falls just under the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a total reduction of about 54%, indicating that each preset tier costs a meaningful share of performance.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 194.8 FPS. Medium settings run at 153.1 FPS, a 21% decrease. High settings reach 98 FPS, a 36% drop from Medium. Ultra settings produce 92.5 FPS, which is only 6% lower than High. The gap between High and Ultra at 1440p is notably smaller than the gap between Medium and High, suggesting diminishing returns in cost as settings approach the maximum. The full range from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 53% reduction, similar to the 4K scaling.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 267.5 FPS. Medium settings run at 213.2 FPS, a 20% decrease. High settings reach 133.7 FPS, a 37% drop from Medium. Ultra settings average 128.4 FPS, just 4% below High. The 1080p results show the smallest relative difference between High and Ultra among all resolutions, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution. The total reduction from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 52%, consistent with the other resolutions.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: the largest performance hit occurs between Medium and High, while the step from High to Ultra is comparatively modest. This suggests that the Ultra preset adds visual features that are less demanding than the jump from Medium to High.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 can run Inside at playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, with one exception. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 57.8 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. However, High settings at 4K average 62.3 FPS, clearing the threshold with a small margin. Low and Medium at 4K run at 124.8 FPS and 95.1 FPS respectively, both comfortably above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, all four presets clear the 60 FPS mark. The lowest performer, Ultra, still averages 92.5 FPS, providing substantial headroom. Low settings reach 194.8 FPS, Medium runs at 153.1 FPS, and High achieves 98 FPS. The system is never in danger of dropping below playable performance at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, every preset runs far above the threshold. The slowest option, Ultra, averages 128.4 FPS. High runs at 133.7 FPS, Medium at 213.2 FPS, and Low at 267.5 FPS. This resolution presents no challenges for the combo, with even the most demanding preset delivering more than double the playable threshold.

The verdict is straightforward: this system can run Inside at 60 FPS or above at every resolution and preset combination except for 4K Ultra, which misses by 2.2 FPS. For players prioritizing maximum visual quality at 4K, a small settings adjustment from Ultra to High resolves the shortfall.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, which averages 62.3 FPS. This provides a slim 2.3 FPS margin above the threshold, so players with variable refresh rate displays may prefer Medium at 95.1 FPS for additional headroom. Ultra at 57.8 FPS is not viable for a locked 60 FPS experience.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is the best choice, averaging 92.5 FPS. This is 32.5 FPS above the threshold, offering both maximum visual quality and comfortable performance headroom. Players who want even higher frame rates can drop to High at 98 FPS, but the visual improvement from Ultra is worth the modest 5.5 FPS cost.

At 1920x1080, Ultra again provides the best experience at 128.4 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold, meaning the system has significant performance reserves. The difference between Ultra and High at this resolution is only 5.3 FPS, so there is little reason to choose lower settings unless targeting extremely high refresh rates.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database for Inside, this pairing ranks 2,811 out of 3,716 total combos. This places it in the 24th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly three-quarters of tested combinations perform better in this game. The rank reflects the game's low hardware demands rather than any weakness in the components themselves — Inside is a puzzle platformer from 2016, and the i5-12600KF with Arc B580 is a mid-range combination from 2021 and 2024 respectively.

The rank relative to other combos does not tell the full story. The measured FPS data shows that this system exceeds 60 FPS in 11 of 12 tested configurations, with only 4K Ultra falling short. The single sub-60 result is 57.8 FPS, which is 3.7% below the threshold. In absolute terms, this is a very capable system for Inside, even if many other tested combos achieve higher frame rates.

The percentile positions of the individual components — 79th for the CPU and 68th for the GPU — suggest that the combo rank is dragged down by the GPU's relative position. The CPU is more capable than the GPU in percentile terms, which is typical for a balanced gaming system. The rank of 2,811 out of 3,716 indicates that many testers used higher-end GPUs, but the practical impact on Inside is minimal given the game's modest requirements.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to Inside's performance across resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU has substantial headroom. The Low preset averages 267.5 FPS, which is more than four times the playable threshold. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU could become the limiting factor if frame rates were pushed even higher, but the i5-12600KF's 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough processing power to keep up with the Arc B580's output.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the average FPS drops by 27% on Low settings (from 267.5 to 194.8) and by 28% on Ultra (from 128.4 to 92.5). This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, as expected when pixel count increases. The CPU's workload remains relatively constant across resolutions, so the frame rate decline tracks the GPU's rendering load.

At 4K, the scaling continues. Low settings drop by 36% from 1440p (from 194.8 to 124.8), while Ultra drops by 38% (from 92.5 to 57.8). The slightly larger percentage drop at Ultra suggests that the most demanding preset amplifies the GPU's workload disproportionately at higher resolutions. The CPU's role remains steady — the i5-12600KF's performance is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at 4K Ultra, as evidenced by the frame rates being solely determined by GPU load.

The preset scaling within each resolution further clarifies the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 52% of the frame rate. At 1440p, the same preset change costs 53%. At 4K, it costs 54%. This nearly identical percentage reduction across resolutions indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver at all tested settings. The CPU's contribution is consistent and adequate, with no signs of it constraining performance at any resolution or preset combination.