Inside

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a highly capable combination for running Inside, a Puzzle Platformer released on 2016-07-06. Benchmark data for this specific combo places it at rank 2366 out of 3716 tested combinations, meaning it sits in the upper-middle portion of the database, outperforming roughly 36% of all tested pairings. The data shows that this system delivers smooth, playable performance across every resolution and preset combination tested, with frame rates that suggest the hardware is far from being stressed by this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2366th out of 3716 total tested combinations, which places it in the 64th percentile of all pairings. This middling rank is somewhat misleading for a game like Inside, as the ranking reflects the entire database of combinations, including those using far more powerful and expensive hardware. The data indicates that this specific pairing is not near the top of the leaderboard, but the actual measured performance in this game tells a more relevant story.

Looking at the individual components, the CPU's average benchmark score is 27799, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900K with an average score of 27872 (a delta of -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D at 27896 (delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE at 27712 (delta 0.3%). The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 17083, which places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 with a score of 17208 (delta -0.7%), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 trails at 17037 (delta 0.3%).

The combination of a 79th-percentile CPU and a 60th-percentile GPU results in a combo rank that is lower than the CPU's percentile but higher than the GPU's. This suggests that for this particular game, the GPU is likely the more limiting factor, though both components are well above the median. The measured FPS data confirms that this combo has no trouble running Inside, achieving well above the playable threshold of 60 FPS in all configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal distinct scaling patterns that indicate which component carries more weight at different resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial, with frame rates dropping from 290.6 FPS at Low to 139 FPS at Ultra — a 51% reduction. This significant scaling with settings at 1080p suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution, as the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a very high rate.

Moving to 1440p, the pattern continues but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings yield 211.5 FPS, while Ultra drops to 101 FPS. The relative performance gap between Low and Ultra is similar to 1080p, indicating that the GPU remains the dominant factor. At 4K, the gap narrows: Low produces 132.4 FPS while Ultra yields 62.2 FPS. The smaller percentage drop at 4K suggests that the GPU is being pushed harder at higher resolutions, but the CPU still manages to keep up.

The most telling data point is the scaling between resolutions at the same preset. At Ultra settings, the system moves from 139 FPS at 1080p to 101 FPS at 1440p (a 27% drop) and then to 62.2 FPS at 4K (a 55% drop from 1440p). This pattern is consistent with GPU-bound performance, where resolution increases place more strain on the graphics processor. The CPU's role appears secondary, as it maintains high frame rates even at 1080p, but the data does not show a scenario where the CPU becomes the limiting factor at any tested resolution or preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 290.6 FPS, Medium drops to 234.5 FPS, High yields 143.9 FPS, and Ultra settles at 139 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at just 4.9 FPS, suggesting that Ultra is not significantly more demanding than High at this resolution. All presets at 1080p are far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the lowest performing preset (Ultra) hitting more than double that mark.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Low settings average 211.5 FPS, Medium drops to 169.4 FPS, High produces 105.9 FPS, and Ultra delivers 101 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is again small, with only a 4.9 FPS difference. The 1440p results show a consistent reduction from 1080p, with Low being about 27% slower, Medium about 28% slower, and High and Ultra both about 26% slower. Every preset at this resolution still comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, with Ultra maintaining a 68% margin above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system starts to feel some pressure but remains playable. Low settings achieve 132.4 FPS, Medium drops to 106.4 FPS, High produces 67 FPS, and Ultra delivers 62.2 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is particularly steep at 39.4 FPS, indicating a significant increase in rendering complexity at this preset level. High and Ultra both remain above 60 FPS, though the margin is slimmer at 4K. The data shows a clear pattern: resolution scaling is substantial, but even at 4K Ultra, the system stays above the playable threshold.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this system can run Inside at all tested resolutions and presets. The verdict for 3840x2160 lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra all as playable settings, with Ultra being the best setting at an average of 62.2 FPS. This means that even at the most demanding configuration, the system maintains a 2.2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra achieving 101 FPS on average. At 1920x1080, the system is equally unrestricted, with Ultra delivering 139 FPS.

The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and this combo exceeds it in every single test case. The lowest average FPS recorded across all configurations is 62.2 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still above the threshold. The data shows that this hardware is more than sufficient for Inside, and users can expect a smooth experience regardless of their resolution or quality preferences. The only caveat is that at 4K Ultra, the margin is thin, so users with variable refresh rate displays may notice minor fluctuations, but the average remains playable.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Inside?*

A: The highest average FPS is 290.6, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 62.2 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra settings, the system drops from 139 FPS at 1080p to 62.2 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 55.2%.

Q: Which settings preset shows the largest performance gap between Medium and High at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the drop from Medium (106.4 FPS) to High (67 FPS) is 39.4 FPS, which is the largest single-step reduction across all tested configurations.

Q: Is there any resolution or preset where the system falls below 60 FPS?

A: No, the lowest average FPS recorded is 62.2 at 4K Ultra, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070's score of 17208.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average FPS of 139. This is the best visual quality available at this resolution, and the system has ample headroom since the frame rate is more than double the threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also deliver the best experience, averaging 101 FPS. This provides a 68% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes with minimal risk of drops.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings remain viable, with an average of 62.2 FPS. This is the only resolution where the margin above 60 FPS is slim, but the data confirms that the system can handle maximum quality at 4K. For users who prefer a larger safety margin, High settings at 67 FPS offer a slightly more comfortable buffer, but Ultra remains the best setting according to the playable criteria.