Inside

Inside is a side-scrolling puzzle platformer with a deliberately understated visual style, but the benchmark data for the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combination reveals a surprisingly demanding workload at higher settings. The recorded measurements show a clear progression of performance scaling across resolutions and presets, making this combo a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate play at standard resolutions, while 4K remains a challenge. This analysis breaks down the measured frames, component roles, and comparable alternatives based solely on the database entries.

Best Settings per Resolution

The goal here is to identify the most visually demanding preset that still maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. For this specific CPU and GPU pairing, the database provides clear verdicts for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the combination handles the maximum preset without issue. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 111.5 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold. This means players can enable the highest visual quality and still have ample headroom for smooth gameplay. The High preset also runs well at 114.3 FPS, but since Ultra is already above the target, it is the recommended choice for this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation remains excellent. The Ultra preset records an average of 77.9 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS line. This is notable because it indicates that the GPU can handle the increased pixel count of 1440p without requiring a reduction in settings. The High preset at 85.7 FPS and Medium at 131.5 FPS are also viable, but the data shows that Ultra is the best setting that still meets the playability standard.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 47.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. High is also below at 52.7 FPS. However, the Medium preset achieves an average of 81.5 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that remains playable at 4K. The Low preset is even faster at 102.9 FPS, but Medium offers a better balance of visual quality and performance according to the measurements. The verdict for 4K is clear: Medium is the best setting for a smooth experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

Determining which component is the bottleneck requires examining the scaling of frame rates across resolutions and presets. The data shows a distinct pattern.

At 1920x1080, the performance spread is wide. Low settings produce 229.9 FPS, while Ultra produces 111.5 FPS. This suggests that at lower presets, the CPU and GPU are working together to push very high frame rates, but as settings increase, the GPU load rises and becomes more dominant. The difference between Low and Ultra is about 118 FPS, which is a substantial gap.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern exists but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings yield 163.1 FPS, and Ultra yields 77.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is now about 85 FPS. This narrowing indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases, but the CPU still has enough headroom to support high frame rates at lower presets.

At 3840x2160, the pattern becomes even more pronounced. Low settings achieve 102.9 FPS, while Ultra drops to 47.6 FPS. The gap is only about 55 FPS, suggesting that at 4K, the GPU is heavily burdened by both the resolution and the higher settings. The CPU, Intel Core i5-12400F with 6 cores and 12 threads, appears to have sufficient processing power to feed the GPU at lower settings, but the GPU's limits are reached quickly as settings increase.

The implication is that this game at 1080p is more balanced, with both components contributing to the high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU starts to take on a larger role, but the CPU still keeps up. At 4K, the GTX 1070 is clearly the primary constraint, as the performance drop from Low to Ultra is relatively modest compared to the resolution jump. The CPU's role is to maintain a stable baseline, but the GPU determines the ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database provides exact average frame rates for each resolution and preset combination. There are no minimum or maximum values recorded, so the analysis relies on averages.

For 1920x1080:

• Low: 229.9 FPS average
• Medium: 184.3 FPS average
• High: 114.3 FPS average
• Ultra: 111.5 FPS average

These numbers show a steep drop from Low to High, but a much smaller difference between High and Ultra. This suggests that the High preset is a significant step up in visual complexity, while Ultra is a more incremental addition.

For 2560x1440:

• Low: 163.1 FPS average
• Medium: 131.5 FPS average
• High: 85.7 FPS average
• Ultra: 77.9 FPS average

At this resolution, the same pattern holds, but the absolute values are lower. The jump from Medium to High is particularly large, with a drop of about 45 FPS. This indicates that High settings at 1440p are quite demanding for the GTX 1070.

For 3840x2160:

• Low: 102.9 FPS average
• Medium: 81.5 FPS average
• High: 52.7 FPS average
• Ultra: 47.6 FPS average

At 4K, the data reveals a critical threshold. Low and Medium are above 60 FPS, but High and Ultra fall below. The drop from Medium to High is about 29 FPS, which is the largest single-step decrease across all resolutions. This suggests that High settings at 4K introduce a level of detail that the GPU cannot handle while maintaining playability.

The overall trend across all resolutions is consistent: Low to Medium is a moderate drop, Medium to High is a steep drop, and High to Ultra is a smaller drop. This pattern is typical for a game where certain visual features are enabled at the High preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database lists nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU based on average benchmark scores. These alternatives can give an idea of what other hardware might produce similar results in Inside.

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with a score of 19047, a delta of 0 percent. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 7535HS would perform nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 3 201E is also close at 19056, with a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning it is essentially tied. The Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982, which is 0.3 percent lower, and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18979, also 0.3 percent lower. None of these differences are significant enough to change the performance profile in this game.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has an average benchmark score of 9780. The nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5000 with a score of 9803, which is -0.2 percent different. The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M scores 9832, a -0.5 percent difference. The NVIDIA Tesla M10 scores 9724, a 0.6 percent difference, and the NVIDIA Tesla C2070 scores 9716, a 0.7 percent difference. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these GPUs would likely deliver frame rates within a few FPS of the GTX 1070 in Inside.

It is important to note that these rival GPUs are not gaming-focused products, but the benchmark data indicates they have similar compute capabilities. For practical gaming purposes, the GTX 1070 remains the reference point, and the similar scores suggest that users with these alternatives would see comparable performance at the same settings and resolutions.

The Verdict

The question is whether this PC can run Inside. The verdict by resolution is clear from the data.

At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable. The Ultra preset delivers 111.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings are Ultra with an average of 111.5 FPS. This is a definitive yes, with headroom for high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, all presets also clear the 60 FPS line. The Ultra preset achieves 77.9 FPS, making it the best choice. The verdict is yes, and the performance is sufficient for a smooth experience even at maximum settings.

At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable. The Medium preset achieves 81.5 FPS, which is above the threshold. High at 52.7 FPS and Ultra at 47.6 FPS are not playable by this standard. The verdict is a conditional yes: the game runs well at 4K, but only if the user is willing to lower settings to Medium or below.

Overall, this combination can run Inside at all tested resolutions, but the experience at 4K requires a tradeoff in visual quality. The data shows that the system is most comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, where it can handle maximum settings with ease.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 3102 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This percentile position is worth examining.

Being in the lower portion of the rankings might seem concerning, but it is important to consider the context. The ranking includes all tested combinations, many of which feature much newer and more powerful hardware. The rank of 3102 out of 3716 means that about 83 percent of tested combos are faster in this game. However, the measured FPS data shows that this combo still delivers playable performance at most settings and resolutions.

The rank reflects the absolute performance ceiling, not the playability. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 111.5 FPS, which is excellent for most users. At 4K Medium, it achieves 81.5 FPS, which is also good. The low rank is likely due to the fact that many higher-end GPUs and CPUs can push much higher frame rates, especially at lower resolutions. For the target audience of a GTX 1070 and i5-12400F, this rank is acceptable, as the practical experience is smooth in most scenarios.

The data implies that this combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from inadequate. It sits in a position where it can handle the game confidently at mainstream resolutions, and only struggles at the most demanding 4K Ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 run Inside at 4K?

A: Yes, at Low and Medium settings. The Medium preset averages 81.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra settings average 52.7 FPS and 47.6 FPS respectively, which are below the threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p with this combo?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, as it averages 77.9 FPS. All presets at 1440p are playable, including Low at 163.1 FPS, Medium at 131.5 FPS, and High at 85.7 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The GTX 1070 has an average score of 9780. The AMD FirePro W5000 is closest at 9803, a -0.2 percent difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M scores 9832 (-0.5 percent), the Tesla M10 scores 9724 (0.6 percent), and the Tesla C2070 scores 9716 (0.7 percent). All are within one percent.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Inside at 1080p?

A: The data shows a wide FPS spread from 229.9 (Low) to 111.5 (Ultra), indicating both components are active. The CPU provides enough headroom for very high frame rates at lower settings, while the GPU becomes more influential as settings increase.

Q: What is the rank of this combo among all tested for Inside?

A: It ranks 3102 out of 3716 combos. This places it in the lower portion of the overall list, but the measured FPS values still show strong playability at most resolutions and settings.

Q: Are there any settings at 1080p that drop below 60 FPS?

A: No. All presets at 1920x1080 are above 60 FPS. The lowest average is Ultra at 111.5 FPS, which is nearly double the threshold.