Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 146 | 155 | 225 | 242 |
| 1440p QHD | 217 | 218 | 260 | 283 |
| 1080p Full HD | 242 | 245 | 291 | 317 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers overwhelming performance in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer. Measured data shows this combination produces triple-digit frame rates at every tested resolution and preset, from a 146 FPS average at 4K Ultra to a 317.3 FPS average at 1080p Low. The pairing ranks 426th out of 3,716 tested combos for this game, placing it comfortably in the top 12% of all systems. The RTX 5090, which sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, provides the dominant force, while the i5-12400, in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, offers ample support without becoming a bottleneck at these frame rates.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes. The measured data shows playable performance at all four tested presets at 3840x2160. The Ultra preset averages 146 FPS, High averages 154.6 FPS, Medium averages 224.8 FPS, and Low averages 241.9 FPS, all far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 217.4 FPS. This is the highest quality preset tested, and it still produces a frame rate nearly 3.6 times higher than the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does the i5-12400 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 18,683. Its closest competitor, the AMD EPYC 7643, scores 18,697, which is only 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i3-14100F trails by 0.9% with a score of 18,519, meaning the i5-12400 sits in a very tight performance cluster.
Q: What is the performance gap between the RTX 5090 and its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 5090 averages 79,842 in benchmark scores. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is the closest rival, scoring 79,605, a mere 0.3% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1% slower, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is 1.4% faster.
Q: Is there any preset at 1080p that drops below 60 FPS?
A: No. The lowest average frame rate recorded at 1920x1080 is 241.7 FPS on the Ultra preset. All other presets exceed 290 FPS, with Low hitting 317.3 FPS, making this resolution exceptionally smooth.
Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate increases from 146 FPS on Ultra to 241.9 FPS on Low. This represents a 65.7% uplift in average frame rate, demonstrating that the GPU has significant headroom even at the highest resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data from Inside clearly shows that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the primary driver of frame rate performance. At 4K, the difference between the Low and Ultra presets is substantial: 241.9 FPS versus 146 FPS, a gap of 95.9 FPS. This scaling indicates that the GPU is handling the bulk of the rendering workload, and its capacity is the limiting factor when pushing higher quality settings. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide more than enough resources for this 2016 title, which was released before these specifications were even conceivable.
At lower resolutions, the CPU's role becomes more apparent, though it never becomes a constraint. At 1080p, the gap between Ultra and Low narrows to 75.6 FPS (241.7 vs 317.3), suggesting that the CPU is starting to provide more of the frame time. The i5-12400, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, delivers a single-thread benchmark score of 910 in 3DMark and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,456, which is more than adequate for a puzzle platformer. The CPU's average benchmark score of 18,683 places it in the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rivals show it is performing within 0.9% of similarly priced alternatives, meaning it is well-matched to avoid bottlenecking the GPU.
The scaling between resolutions further confirms this split. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings reduces the average frame rate from 241.7 FPS to 217.4 FPS, a modest 10.0% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra reduces the average from 217.4 FPS to 146 FPS, a 32.8% decrease. The larger drop at higher resolutions is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios, where the pixel throughput demands more from the graphics card. The RTX 5090's pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s are the specifications that enable these high figures, even at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 426th out of 3,716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the top 11.5% of all configurations tested for this game, which is a strong result given that the database includes many high-end and specialized builds. The rank reflects the measured FPS data, which shows no preset or resolution dipping below 146 FPS average, ensuring the system is never challenged by the game's requirements.
The ranking is notable because the CPU is a mid-range desktop part from 2022, while the GPU is a flagship from 2025. The i5-12400's percentile of 72 among all CPUs suggests it is a solid but not exceptional processor, yet the combined system still achieves a top-tier rank. This indicates that Inside is far more dependent on GPU performance than CPU performance. The RTX 5090's 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary driver of this high combo rank, as the game's 2D side-scrolling perspective and limited physics calculations place minimal strain on the processor. The result is a system that outperforms 3,290 other combinations, including many with more powerful CPUs paired with weaker graphics cards.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core i5-12400, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are a mix of server and mobile processors. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18,697, just 0.1% higher, meaning a user swapping to this server chip would see virtually identical performance in CPU-bound tasks. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18,730, 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18,811, 0.7% higher. The only rival that is slower is the Intel Core i3-14100F, which scores 18,519, a 0.9% deficit. These deltas are all under 1%, indicating that any of these processors would behave nearly identically to the i5-12400 in Inside, as the game's CPU demands are minimal.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5090's nearest rivals are professional and mobile parts. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 12 GB versions score 79,605 and 79,396, respectively, representing a 0.3% and 0.6% deficit compared to the RTX 5090's 79,842. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, which is 1.1% lower. The only rival that scores higher is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80,959, a 1.4% advantage. For Inside, these differences are inconsequential, as all of these GPUs would produce frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. A system with any of these alternative GPUs paired with the i5-12400 would deliver nearly identical measured FPS, with the RTX 5090's advantage being most pronounced at 4K Ultra, where it hits 146 FPS versus an estimated 144 FPS for the Pro Vega 64X.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 317.3 FPS, Medium averages 291 FPS, High averages 245.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 241.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 75.6 FPS, a 23.8% reduction in average frame rate when maxing out settings. The gap between High and Ultra is only 3.7 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds minimal visual fidelity for a negligible performance cost at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, frame rates remain extremely high. The Low preset averages 282.5 FPS, Medium averages 260.2 FPS, High averages 217.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 217.4 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 65.1 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, showing that the GPU is beginning to feel the resolution increase. Notably, the High and Ultra presets are nearly identical, with only a 0.4 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset is not significantly more demanding than High at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the performance scales down but remains exceptional. The Low preset averages 241.9 FPS, Medium averages 224.8 FPS, High averages 154.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 146 FPS. The drop from Low to High is 87.3 FPS, the largest gap of any resolution, demonstrating that the higher quality settings at 4K place a significant load on the GPU. The difference between High and Ultra is 8.6 FPS, which is the smallest gap between those two presets across all resolutions, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not particularly taxing relative to High at this resolution.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 can absolutely run Inside, and it does so with exceptional headroom. The verdict data confirms that every resolution and preset combination tested clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin. At 3840x2160, all four presets are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 146 FPS. This means a user can enjoy the game at maximum quality in 4K with more than double the frame rate required for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the system delivers even more performance, with Ultra averaging 217.4 FPS and all presets exceeding 217 FPS. The best settings are Ultra, providing a 3.6x margin over the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the performance is staggering, with Ultra averaging 241.7 FPS and Low reaching 317.3 FPS. The best settings are Ultra, ensuring that even the most demanding preset offers a 4x margin over the playable threshold.
This system is overqualified for Inside. The game, released in 2016, was designed for hardware of that era, and the combination of a 2022 mid-range CPU and a 2025 flagship GPU produces frame rates that are effectively uncapped. The data shows no min or max FPS values, only averages, which suggests the testing methodology focused on sustained performance, and every recorded average is a multiple of the 60 FPS target. For any user with a high refresh rate display, this combo will drive it to its limits at any resolution and preset.