Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 116 | 121 | 165 | 176 |
| 1440p QHD | 160 | 160 | 191 | 211 |
| 1080p Full HD | 176 | 178 | 213 | 232 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for Inside with the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination shows consistently high frame rates across all tested resolutions and presets. The measurements cover three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) and four settings levels (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), with all results expressed as average FPS.
At 1920x1080, the lowest average FPS recorded is 175.8 at Ultra settings. The Medium preset delivers 212.7 FPS, High settings reach 178.4 FPS, and the Low preset produces the highest average at 232 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 56.2 FPS, which demonstrates that the game's visual settings have a measurable but not dramatic impact on performance when the resolution is this moderate.
Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS figures remain well above the playable threshold. Low settings produce 211.1 FPS, Medium delivers 191.1 FPS, High reaches 159.6 FPS, and Ultra settles at 160 FPS. Interestingly, the High and Ultra presets are nearly identical in performance here, with only a 0.4 FPS difference between them. The spread from Low to Ultra is 51.1 FPS, slightly narrower than at 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops are more pronounced but still leave substantial headroom. Low settings average 176.1 FPS, Medium delivers 165.1 FPS, High reaches 120.9 FPS, and Ultra produces 116.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 59.7 FPS, the largest spread across all three resolutions. This indicates that at higher pixel counts, the graphical preset choice matters more for achieving consistent frame pacing.
Best Settings per Resolution
The database records the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS for each resolution, and in this case every single setting combination clears that threshold.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with a recorded average FPS of 175.8. This leaves a massive margin above the 60 FPS playable standard, so users can enable the highest visual quality without concern.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best settings choice, delivering 160 FPS on average. The 1440p Ultra result is 15.8 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra figure, but the margin over the playable threshold remains enormous.
At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best settings option, with an average of 116.4 FPS. This is the closest any configuration comes to the 60 FPS line, but it still clears it by 56.4 FPS. All four presets at 4K are playable according to the verdict data, including Low at 176.1 FPS, Medium at 165.1 FPS, and High at 120.9 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling patterns across resolutions and presets reveal how the CPU and GPU each contribute to performance in Inside. This game is not particularly demanding by modern standards, and the data reflects that the RTX 4070 Ti is carrying most of the load at every resolution.
When comparing the same preset across resolutions, the frame rate drops that occur as resolution increases are relatively mild. For example, at Ultra settings, the average FPS goes from 175.8 at 1080p to 160 at 1440p, a reduction of 15.8 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K Ultra drops the average from 160 to 116.4 FPS, a reduction of 43.6 FPS. This larger drop when moving to 4K indicates that the GPU becomes more heavily utilized at higher pixel counts, as expected.
The Low preset shows a different scaling pattern. At 1080p Low, the average is 232 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 211.1 FPS, and at 4K Low it reaches 176.1 FPS. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p is 20.9 FPS, while the reduction from 1440p to 4K is 35 FPS. The relatively small drops at lower settings suggest that the CPU can keep up with the GPU even when the rendering load is lightened.
The Medium preset follows a similar trajectory: 212.7 FPS at 1080p, 191.1 FPS at 1440p, and 165.1 FPS at 4K. The High preset goes from 178.4 FPS at 1080p to 159.6 FPS at 1440p to 120.9 FPS at 4K.
The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Comet Lake part with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, has a percentile rank of 68 against all CPUs in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 10283, and its single-core score is 1451. These figures indicate a solid mid-range processor that is not the bottleneck in this pairing. The GPU, with a percentile rank of 84 against all GPUs, is the stronger component in absolute terms, and its Passmark G3D score of 31624 confirms its high-end positioning.
The fact that even at 1080p Low, the average FPS only reaches 232 suggests that the CPU is not artificially limiting the frame rate, but the game's engine may have a natural ceiling or the CPU is approaching its limit at that point. At 4K Ultra, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the resolution increase produces the largest relative performance drop.
FAQ
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The recorded average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 116.4, which is 56.4 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the fastest preset and resolution combination in the recorded data?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 232 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next fastest is 212.7 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 175.8 at 1920x1080 to 116.4 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 59.4 FPS.
Q: Which is the stronger component in this pairing?
A: The GPU ranks in the 84th percentile against all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 68th percentile against all CPUs. The GPU also has a higher average benchmark score of 44795 compared to the CPU's 14185.
Q: Are there any settings at any resolution where the frame rate falls below 60 FPS?
A: No. Every recorded combination, from 4K Ultra at 116.4 FPS to 1080p Low at 232 FPS, stays above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the High preset compare to Ultra at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, High averages 159.6 FPS and Ultra averages 160 FPS, a difference of only 0.4 FPS. They are effectively identical in performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination ranks 1645 out of 3716 tested combos in the database for Inside. This places the pairing in the upper half of all recorded systems, specifically in the 55.7th percentile of tested combinations. Given that Inside is not a demanding title, the ranking reflects both the overall strength of the components and the fact that many higher-end combos may be limited by the game's frame rate ceiling rather than their own capabilities.
The GPU alone sits in the 84th percentile against all GPUs, which is notably higher than the combo's overall ranking. This suggests that the pairing's position is influenced by the CPU's more modest standing. The CPU's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6756E with an average score of 14163 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core 7 160UL with an average score of 14232 and a delta of -0.3 percent, the AMD EPYC 7552 with an average score of 14115 and a delta of 0.5 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C with an average score of 14277 and a delta of -0.6 percent. These rivals are all within a fraction of a percent of the i5-10400F's average benchmark score of 14185.
The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile with an average score of 45152 and a delta of -0.8 percent, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT with an average score of 45384 and a delta of -1.3 percent, the NVIDIA RTX A6000 with an average score of 44075 and a delta of 1.6 percent, and the Intel Arc A730M with an average score of 45592 and a delta of -1.7 percent. The RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score is 44795.
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance at every resolution and preset combination tested. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four settings levels are playable at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra with an average FPS of 175.8. At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, delivering 160 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the top option with 116.4 FPS. Even the most demanding configuration, 4K Ultra, clears the 60 FPS threshold by 56.4 FPS, meaning there is no scenario in the recorded data where this system struggles to maintain playable performance.
The lowest recorded average across all twelve measurements is 116.4 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still nearly double the playable threshold. This system has enough headroom for the game's maximum visual settings at any resolution, and the CPU and GPU combination shows no signs of bottlenecking in this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users exploring comparable hardware, the nearest rivals to the CPU and GPU in the database provide useful reference points.
The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, which is 0.2 percent lower, making it effectively identical in overall CPU performance. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, 0.3 percent higher. The AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115, 0.5 percent lower, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277, 0.6 percent higher. Any of these processors would behave very similarly to the i5-10400F in terms of raw benchmark performance.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, which is 0.8 percent higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384, 1.3 percent higher. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, 1.6 percent lower, and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, 1.7 percent higher. These GPUs are all within a narrow performance band of the RTX 4070 Ti and would produce similar frame rates in Inside, given that the game is not particularly demanding on graphics hardware.
Users coming from any of these nearby components can expect comparable results in this game, with the caveat that the specific CPU and GPU pairing matters less in a title where even the lowest recorded average FPS is 116.4 at 4K Ultra. The combination's rank of 1645 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside confirms that many different hardware configurations can handle this game comfortably, but the i5-10400F and RTX 4070 Ti pairing sits comfortably in the upper half of all tested systems.