Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

47%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
233 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
147 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
208 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
106 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
66 FPS
6.5ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 70 112 140
1440p QHD 106 111 178 208
1080p Full HD 147 155 215 233

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 155
1920x1080 Low 233
1920x1080 Medium 215
1920x1080 Ultra 147
2560x1440 High 111
2560x1440 Low 208
2560x1440 Medium 178
2560x1440 Ultra 106
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 112
3840x2160 Ultra 66

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing proves to be exceptionally capable for running Inside, a 2D puzzle platformer. The recorded data shows that this combination delivers high frame rates across all tested resolutions, with performance scaling predictably from 1080p to 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gameplay?

A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS. The measured average is 66 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. It sits within 2.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX 7700, and it is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate performance.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this game?

A: Given that even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset produces 66 FPS, the Core i5-10400F appears sufficient. The CPU sits in the 68th percentile among all tested processors, and its multi-threaded score of 12115 in PassMark suggests it has ample headroom for a title like Inside.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 208 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 106 FPS. This represents a drop of 102 FPS, yet both remain far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the game run well on medium settings at 4K?

A: Yes, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 averages 112 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. This is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: The database ranks this combination at 2427 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the upper third of all configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

For a game like Inside, the workload is relatively modest, and the data reveals that the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 86 FPS (233 FPS down to 147 FPS). This gap widens at 2560x1440, where the spread between Low and Ultra is 102 FPS (208 FPS down to 106 FPS). At 3840x2160, the Low to Ultra delta is 74 FPS (140 FPS down to 66 FPS).

The resolution scaling tells a clear story. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings reduces the average frame rate from 147 FPS to 106 FPS, a 41 FPS drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra drops the average from 106 FPS to 66 FPS, another 40 FPS decrease. This consistent decline indicates that pixel throughput is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario.

The CPU's role is less pronounced. The Core i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, delivers a PassMark multi-thread score of 12115 and a single-thread score of 2541. In a game with simple physics and limited on-screen entities, the processor is unlikely to be the constraint. The fact that the 4K Ultra preset still yields 66 FPS suggests the GPU is handling the bulk of the scaling pressure, while the CPU maintains frame pacing without issue.

Preset scaling reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p, the jump from Medium to Ultra costs 68 FPS (215 FPS to 147 FPS). At 4K, the same preset jump costs 46 FPS (112 FPS to 66 FPS). The diminishing absolute cost at higher resolutions points to the GPU becoming more saturated, while the CPU continues to feed frames efficiently. For this title, the RX 9060 is the component that determines playability, especially at 4K where the Ultra preset hovers just above the 60 FPS line.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 147 FPS. There is no reason to drop below this setting, as the frame rate is more than double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best choice, delivering an average of 106 FPS. The margin above 60 FPS is substantial, leaving room for demanding scenes without concern.

At 3840x2160, Ultra is still the recommended setting, but the margin narrows. The average sits at 66 FPS, which is only 6 FPS above the playable threshold. For players who prefer a larger safety buffer, the High preset at 70 FPS or the Medium preset at 112 FPS are viable alternatives. The Medium preset also provides a recorded minimum of 95 FPS, ensuring consistent performance.

The data shows that this system never forces a compromise. Every resolution and preset combination tested exceeds 60 FPS on average, with the lowest recorded figure being 66 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have close rivals in the database that would produce similar in-game results.

The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6756E, which scores 14163, a difference of only 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 7552 is 0.5% ahead, and the Intel Core 7 160UL is 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C trails by 0.6%. For Inside, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates, as the game's CPU demand is modest relative to what these chips offer.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014 on average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the closest competitor at 16129, a 0.7% advantage. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 are both 1% behind, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% behind. In practical terms, swapping the RX 9060 for an RTX 3060 Ti would yield nearly identical frame rates in Inside, with differences well within run-to-run variance.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Inside at every resolution and preset combination recorded in the database. The verdict data confirms that all settings at all three resolutions are playable.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 147 FPS, the highest playable setting with a massive margin above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 106 FPS, still a comfortable margin. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 66 FPS, which clears the threshold but with less headroom.

For players targeting 4K, the High preset at 70 FPS offers a slightly safer margin, while the Medium preset at 112 FPS with a 95 FPS minimum provides the most consistent experience. The Low preset at 4K reaches 140 FPS, indicating that the system has significant headroom even at the highest resolution.

The only caveat is the slim 6 FPS margin at 4K Ultra. If the game has any particularly heavy scenes not captured in the average, the frame rate could dip below 60 FPS. The Medium preset eliminates this risk entirely while still delivering a high-quality visual experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination at rank 2427 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the upper third of all configurations tested.

The ranking is somewhat surprising given the exceptional frame rates recorded. The explanation lies in the nature of the game: Inside is a 2D puzzle platformer with modest graphical demands, so even mid-range hardware can achieve high frame rates. The ranking reflects the full spectrum of tested systems, many of which include much more powerful CPUs and GPUs that push frame rates even higher.

The absolute performance data is what matters most for this title. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset and resolution, and it maintains a minimum of 95 FPS at 4K Medium. For the vast majority of players, the 2427 rank out of 3716 is irrelevant; the measured experience is smooth, responsive, and visually unrestricted.