Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

47%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
131 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
203 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
98 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
63 FPS
7.1ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 63 65 104 128
1440p QHD 98 102 158 203
1080p Full HD 131 141 223 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 223
1920x1080 Ultra 131
2560x1440 High 102
2560x1440 Low 203
2560x1440 Medium 158
2560x1440 Ultra 98
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Low 128
3840x2160 Medium 104
3840x2160 Ultra 63

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a potent combination for Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. The measured FPS data shows this system is not just capable of running the game; it obliterates the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset tested. Across all twelve measured configurations, the lowest average frame rate recorded is 62.9 FPS, which occurs at 4K Ultra settings. This indicates that the hardware has substantial headroom, making it a suitable choice for high-refresh-rate monitors and demanding visual settings without compromise.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data for this combo covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a complete picture of performance scaling. The core takeaway is that this system never dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold, even under the most demanding configuration. The data shows a clear and predictable pattern: performance decreases as resolution and graphical fidelity increase, but the margin of safety remains significant.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 279.7, which is an extraordinarily high number, more than enough for any high-refresh-rate display. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 223.3 FPS. High settings yield an average of 140.6 FPS, and even at Ultra, the system maintains a robust 131.4 FPS average. This resolution is clearly CPU-bound, given the massive frame rates, and the RTX 3060 Ti is barely breaking a sweat.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains stellar. The Low preset achieves an average of 202.8 FPS, still an incredibly high figure. Medium settings produce an average of 158.4 FPS. High settings see a more considerable drop to 101.6 FPS, but this is still well above the 60 FPS threshold. At Ultra settings, the average FPS is 98.1, demonstrating that the combination can handle 1440p with maximum fidelity while maintaining a high refresh rate experience.

At 4K (3840x2160), the system starts to show its limits, though it remains comfortably playable. The Low preset still achieves a very high average of 128 FPS. Medium settings average 103.8 FPS. High settings drop to 64.5 FPS, which is a significant step down from the 1440p result but still clears the 60 FPS line. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 62.9 FPS. This is the only configuration where the average frame rate is within striking distance of the 60 FPS playability threshold, but it does not fall below it.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K with all settings maxed out?*

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows an average of 62.9 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p to ensure a high refresh rate?

A: The system is capable of high refresh rates at 1440p across all presets. Even at Ultra settings, it achieves an average of 98.1 FPS. For the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset averages 202.8 FPS.

Q: How does performance scale between 1080p and 4K?

A: Performance scales predictably with resolution. For example, at High settings, the average FPS drops from 140.6 at 1920x1080 to 101.6 at 2560x1440, and further to 64.5 at 3840x2160. The system retains playability at all resolutions.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti a bottleneck for this CPU in this game?

A: The data suggests the system is well-balanced. At 1080p, the frame rates are extremely high (279.7 FPS on Low), which can be limited by CPU performance. As resolution increases to 4K, the GPU becomes the more significant factor, but the combo still delivers playable results.

Q: Which resolution and preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the system averages 98.1 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining a frame rate well above 60 FPS, making it a strong choice for a high-fidelity experience.

Q: Are there any settings where the game is unplayable?

A: No. Every tested configuration—all four presets at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160—averages above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti holds a rank of 2549 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the 31st percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 31% of the configurations in the database for this particular game. While this rank might seem low, it is crucial to contextualize it. The database includes a vast array of hardware, from budget integrated graphics to top-tier enthusiast builds with multiple flagship GPUs. The percentile is a measure of relative performance against all of them.

Given the age of Inside and its relatively modest system requirements, a modern mid-range setup like this one performs admirably. The rank of 2549 is more a reflection of the fact that many high-end systems are in the database, pushing this combo to the lower half. However, the actual measured FPS data is what matters for a practical assessment. The system's ability to maintain an average of over 60 FPS in all settings and resolutions is the primary indicator of its capability, and the rank should be viewed in that light. The system is clearly not a top-tier performer, but it is more than sufficient for a flawless experience in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU offer insight into what other hardware would deliver similar performance in this system.

For the Intel Core i3-12100F, the closest performance matches are the Intel Core 3 N355, the Intel Core i5-9500, the Intel Core 5 120UL, and the Intel Core i7-1250U. The average benchmark scores show these are all within a very tight margin. The Core 3 N355 has an average score of 13492, representing a 0% difference. The Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452, which is 0.3% higher than the i3-12100F. The Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, which is 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351, which is 1.1% higher. This indicates that swapping the i3-12100F for any of these processors would result in a negligible change in overall system performance in CPU-bound scenarios, as their average scores are nearly identical.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 9060, the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, and the AMD Radeon R9 370X. The RTX 3060 Ti has an average score of 16129. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, which is 0.7% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, which is 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, also 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, which is 1.7% lower. In practical terms, these differences are within the margin of error and would result in nearly identical frame rates in Inside. A user with a Radeon RX 5700 XT, for example, would see very similar performance to the RTX 3060 Ti.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Inside across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound. This is evident from the extremely high average frame rates, such as 279.7 FPS on Low and 223.3 FPS on Medium. These numbers are so high that the GPU is not the limiting factor; instead, the i3-12100F's ability to process the game's logic and draw calls sets the ceiling. The scaling between presets is also a clue, as the difference between Low and Ultra is significant (279.7 FPS vs 131.4 FPS), but even the "lowest" GPU-bound result is high enough to suggest the CPU is still keeping pace.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the load shifts more towards the GPU. The average FPS drops across all presets, but the system remains fluid. The difference between Low (202.8 FPS) and Ultra (98.1 FPS) shows that the GPU is now doing more work, but the CPU is still capable of feeding it enough data to maintain high performance. The system is more balanced at this resolution, with neither component creating a severe bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The average frame rate drops to 64.5 FPS at High and 62.9 FPS at Ultra, which is a substantial reduction from the 1440p results. This indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti is now being pushed to its limits, and the CPU has more than enough headroom to keep up. The low and medium presets still achieve high frame rates (128 and 103.8 FPS, respectively), but the Ultra and High presets are constrained by the GPU's pixel processing and shading capabilities. In summary, the CPU is the primary driver at 1080p, the system is balanced at 1440p, and the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: this PC can run Inside flawlessly. The verdict by resolution confirms that every single resolution and preset combination tested is playable, with all average FPS values exceeding the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The best settings are Ultra, which yields an average of 131.4 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold and provides an incredibly smooth experience on any monitor.

At 2560x1440, the combination remains outstanding. The best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 98.1 FPS. This is still well above 60 FPS, allowing for high-refresh-rate gaming with maximum visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the system is still fully capable. The best settings are Ultra, with an average of 62.9 FPS. While this is the most demanding scenario, it still clears the 60 FPS line, ensuring a smooth and playable experience at 4K. There is no scenario in the data where this hardware fails to deliver a playable frame rate in Inside. This makes it a reliable and powerful choice for this game.