Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 32 | 51 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 51 | 81 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 70 | 113 | 141 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
Similar Performance Alternatives
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X sits in a crowded performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 57498 places it within 1.5% of several heavy hitters. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555, a mere 0.1% ahead, making it a statistical tie. The AMD EPYC 7313 trails by just 0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-14900 leads by 1.1%. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is 1.4% faster. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in a game like Inside, where the CPU is rarely the bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p.
The Intel Arc B370 is an entirely different story. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 puts it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are all legacy or low-end parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192. All three are within 0.7% of the Arc B370. The AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower. The data shows this is not a discrete gaming GPU; it is an integrated-class solution, and any of these near-identical rivals would produce similar frame rates in Inside.
For a builder considering this pairing, the CPU is overkill for the workload while the GPU defines the experience. The processor will not hold back the graphics solution at any resolution tested. The Arc B370's performance envelope is the limiting factor, and users coming from any of the listed rival GPUs should expect a like-for-like swap.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Inside at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average of 67 FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: Medium is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable on this hardware?
A: Only at Low settings. The average at 3840x1440 on Low is 64 FPS. Medium drops to 51 FPS, High drops to 32 FPS, and Ultra drops to 30 FPS, none of which clear the threshold.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested combinations?
A: The combo ranks 3422 out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This places it in the lower portion of the database, reflecting the GPU's limited graphics throughput.
Q: What is the most demanding preset that holds 60 FPS at 1080p?
A: Ultra is the most demanding playable preset at 1920x1080, with an average of 67 FPS. High also clears the bar at 70 FPS, but Ultra is the highest tier available.
Q: Does the Ryzen 9 9900X bottleneck the Arc B370 in this game?
A: No. The recorded frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings, which indicates the graphics solution is the performance limiter. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 32172 in Cinebench R23 and single-thread score of 2253 are far beyond what Inside requires.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this specific CPU and GPU pairing at 3422 out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. That places the combo in the bottom 8% of all systems tested. This is not a reflection of the processor; the Ryzen 9 9900X sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The ranking is dragged down entirely by the Intel Arc B370, which sits at the 5th percentile of all GPUs.
The practical implication is straightforward: most other tested systems will outperform this one in Inside. The game is not demanding by modern standards, but the Arc B370's integrated-class performance limits the experience to low-to-medium settings at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combo manages to deliver playable frame rates across all presets, but the margins shrink quickly as resolution increases.
The rank also suggests that users should not expect headroom for future titles or higher graphical loads. The Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 20 ROPs define a hard ceiling. Inside is a puzzle platformer with modest visuals, so the combo clears the bar at 1080p and 1440p, but it does so without much room to spare at the higher resolution.
The Verdict
This system can run Inside, but the experience depends heavily on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold. The average at Ultra is 67 FPS, which is playable but not by a wide margin. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium averaging 81 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low clears 60 FPS, averaging 64 FPS.
The verdict from the recorded data: this is a 1080p machine for Inside, with comfortable Ultra settings. At 1440p, Medium is the sensible ceiling. At 4K, users must drop to Low to maintain playability. The Arc B370 is the decisive factor; the Ryzen 9 9900X provides far more compute than this game requires, and the GPU's 5th percentile standing means every resolution increase costs a significant chunk of performance.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. Low settings average 141 FPS. Medium averages 113 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 130 FPS. High averages 70 FPS. Ultra averages 67 FPS. All presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the minimum recorded on Medium holds above 90 FPS.
At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low averages 101 FPS. Medium averages 81 FPS, with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS. High drops to 51 FPS, which misses the threshold. Ultra drops further to 48 FPS. The step from Medium to High costs 30 FPS on average, a steep penalty that reflects the GPU's limited fill rate.
At 3840x2160, the picture weakens further. Low averages 64 FPS, just clearing the threshold. Medium averages 51 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS. High averages 32 FPS. Ultra averages 30 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 13 FPS, and the gap between Medium and High is 19 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates the GPU is fully saturated at 4K.
The data shows no min or max values for Low, High, or Ultra presets at any resolution, only for Medium. This suggests the Medium preset was the primary focus of the frame time capture, or the other presets produced too much variance to record stable bounds. Regardless, the averages are consistent across resolutions and settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which averages 67 FPS. This is the highest preset available and it clears the 60 FPS threshold. Users who prefer higher minimums can drop to Medium, which averages 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended choice for image quality.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, averaging 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS. High drops below the threshold at 51 FPS, so Medium is the clear ceiling. The 69 FPS minimum provides a small safety margin for busy scenes.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, averaging 64 FPS. This is the only preset that clears 60 FPS at 4K. Medium averages 51 FPS, which is close but below the threshold, and the minimum of 43 FPS suggests noticeable dips during gameplay. Users prioritizing 4K should accept Low settings or drop to 1440p for a better balance.
The recommended configuration is 1080p Ultra for the best visual quality, or 1440p Medium for a sharper image with a comfortable frame rate. At 4K, Low is the only viable option, and the 64 FPS average leaves little headroom for demanding scenes.