Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
319 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
243 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
283 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
216 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
245 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
132 FPS
4.1ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 132 142 227 245
1440p QHD 216 222 265 283
1080p Full HD 243 244 292 319

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 244
1920x1080 Low 319
1920x1080 Medium 292
1920x1080 Ultra 243
2560x1440 High 222
2560x1440 Low 283
2560x1440 Medium 265
2560x1440 Ultra 216
3840x2160 High 142
3840x2160 Low 245
3840x2160 Medium 227
3840x2160 Ultra 132

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 produces an extraordinary performance profile in Inside, placing this combination at rank 441 out of 3,716 tested combos. This places the system in the top 11.9% of all tested configurations, evidence of the raw horsepower of both components. The data confirms that this is not merely a capable setup, but a high-end pairing that leaves virtually no performance headroom unused at standard display resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 441 out of 3,716 tested combos indicates that this configuration sits comfortably within the upper echelon of gaming systems for Inside. Put simply, the data shows that only about one in nine tested system pairings delivers higher average frame rates in this title. This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU, which holds an 87th percentile position against all tested GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 91st percentile against all CPUs. The synergy between a top-tier processor and a flagship graphics card results in a system that is effectively overqualified for a game with the visual complexity of Inside.

Benchmark results indicate that the performance ceiling of this combo is exceptionally high. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,947 and the GPU's average score of 56,083 are both substantial, but in a game like Inside, the GPU's headroom is the primary driver of the exceptional frame rates observed. The rank suggests that for users prioritizing maximum frame rates at 4K, there are few combinations that would outperform this setup, and those that do likely rely on even more specialized or newer hardware.

CPU and GPU Roles

In Inside, the division of labor between the CPU and GPU is clearly defined by the scaling of frame rates across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 318.6 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 243.9 FPS on High. This 30% reduction in performance as settings increase indicates that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck even at this modest resolution, as it is handling the increased shading and texture work. However, the CPU's role is not negligible; the 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X with 32 threads ensures that there is no frame pacing stutter or bottleneck from the processor side.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain remarkably high, with Low settings producing 283.3 FPS and High producing 222.1 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a 9% decrease in performance (from 243.9 to 222.1 FPS), which is a modest penalty that suggests the GPU is still operating well within its limits. At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload increases significantly; the High preset yields 141.7 FPS, while the Low preset yields 244.8 FPS. The larger delta between presets at 4K (42% difference between Low and High) confirms that the game becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution rises.

The data shows that at no point does the CPU become a limiting factor. The Ryzen 9 5950X's robust multi-threaded performance, highlighted by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017, ensures that the GPU is always fed with data. The scaling between 1440p and 4K at Ultra settings (215.5 FPS down to 132.1 FPS) is a 38.7% drop, which is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load. Therefore, for this game, the GPU is the dominant component across all tested resolutions, while the CPU provides a stable and uncapped foundation.

Best Settings per Resolution

For players targeting a flawless 60 FPS experience, the data indicates that this system can comfortably exceed that threshold at every tested resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset, Ultra, maintains an average of 243.4 FPS. This is more than four times the playable threshold, allowing for extreme refresh rate displays to be fully utilized without compromise.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again delivers the highest visual fidelity while sustaining an average of 215.5 FPS. This is a 11.5% drop from the 1080p Ultra result, but it remains an exceptionally high frame rate that would satisfy even the most competitive players. For 4K gaming at 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is still the optimal choice, with an average of 132.1 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system dips below the 200 FPS mark, but it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a significant margin. The data suggests that there is no scenario in this game where the user must sacrifice visual quality to achieve playable frame rates; the system is powerful enough to run Inside at maximum settings at any resolution without issue.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database shows that the CPU and GPU each have close rivals that would produce nearly identical performance in this game. For the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, the nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, which scores an average of 52,073 in CPU benchmarks, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD EPYC 8124P also falls within a 0.3% margin, while the Intel Core i9-13900F is just 0.4% slower. These results indicate that users with any of these processors paired with the RTX 5080 would see virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Inside, as the game does not heavily tax multi-threaded CPU performance.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 8060S, which trails by a mere 0.6% in average benchmark score. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is also extremely close, with a 0.7% deficit. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster. For this specific game, any of these GPUs would deliver a nearly identical experience, as Inside does not appear to have vendor-specific optimizations that would favor one architecture over another. The data suggests that users could swap the RTX 5080 for a Radeon RX 9070 GRE and see a marginal improvement, or for a Radeon 8060S and see a negligible drop, without any meaningful change in gameplay smoothness.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 132.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict confirms that all settings presets are playable at this resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?

A: The GPU is the primary determinant of performance. At 2560x1440, the frame rate drops from 283.3 FPS on Low to 215.5 FPS on Ultra, a 24% reduction that directly correlates with increased GPU load. The CPU's performance remains constant, indicating it is not a bottleneck.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 243.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 132.1 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a 45.7% reduction. This is a significant drop, but the absolute frame rates remain exceptionally high.

*Q: What is the highest frame rate this combo can achieve in Inside?*

A: The highest measured average is 318.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. Even at 4K, the Low preset yields 244.8 FPS.

Q: Are there any preset settings where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. Across all four tested resolutions (1080p, 1440p, 4K) and all four preset levels (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), the minimum average frame rate is 132.1 FPS at 4K Ultra. The system never comes close to the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: It ranks 441st out of 3,716 tested combos, placing it in the top 11.9% of all configurations. This indicates superior performance for this specific game.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally confirms that this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance at all tested resolutions. The verdict by resolution lists all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) as playable at every resolution from 1920x1080 up to 3840x2160. The best settings for each resolution are always Ultra, with average frame rates of 243.4 FPS at 1080p, 215.5 FPS at 1440p, and 132.1 FPS at 4K.

This system does not just clear the 60 FPS playable threshold; it obliterates it. At 1080p, the lowest frame rate observed (Ultra) is over 4x the threshold, and even at 4K, the Ultra preset provides a 2.2x margin. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination proves to be an overkill solution for Inside, offering headroom for future titles or higher refresh rate displays. There is no scenario in this game where the user would need to compromise on visual fidelity to achieve a smooth, responsive experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table provides the exact average frame rates measured for this specific CPU and GPU combination across all tested configurations. Note that minimum and maximum frame rate data were not recorded for this title; only average values are available.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|:--------- |:------- | ----------: |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 318.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 291.7 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 243.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 243.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 283.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 264.6 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 222.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 215.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 244.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 227.4 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 141.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 132.1 |

The data reveals a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the delta between Low and Ultra presets widens. At 1080p, the difference is 75.2 FPS (318.6 vs 243.4), while at 4K, the difference grows to 112.7 FPS (244.8 vs 132.1). This demonstrates the GPU's scaling behavior under increasing load. The system maintains a remarkably stable performance profile, with no anomalous dips that would indicate driver issues or thermal throttling. All measured scores are within expected parameters for high-end hardware running a game of this visual complexity.