Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
408 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
236 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
356 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
170 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
223 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
106 FPS
4ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 106 110 182 223
1440p QHD 170 176 282 356
1080p Full HD 236 251 376 408

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 251
1920x1080 Low 408
1920x1080 Medium 376
1920x1080 Ultra 236
2560x1440 High 176
2560x1440 Low 356
2560x1440 Medium 282
2560x1440 Ultra 170
3840x2160 High 110
3840x2160 Low 223
3840x2160 Medium 182
3840x2160 Ultra 106

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The data for Inside with the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 shows an exceptionally high-performance pairing for a puzzle platformer. The measured frame rates are consistently far above the 60 FPS playability threshold across all tested resolutions and presets, indicating that this combination is significantly overqualified for the game's demands. The analysis focuses on the scaling patterns and the headroom available, rather than on any struggle to maintain playability.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 106 FPS, which is the most demanding setting tested and still well above the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets at this resolution also exceed 60 FPS, with High at 110.4 FPS, Medium at 181.9 FPS, and Low at 222.5 FPS.

Q: How does the frame rate scale between 1080p and 1440p at the Ultra preset?

A: The data shows a significant jump. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 236.2 FPS, while at 2560x1440, it averages 170.3 FPS. This represents a reduction of approximately 28% in average frame rate when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: Which resolution shows the smallest performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset runs at 407.6 FPS and the Ultra preset at 236.2 FPS, a difference of 171.4 FPS. This is the smallest absolute gap between these two presets across the tested resolutions, though the relative difference is still substantial.

Q: Is there a measurable performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 4K?

A: Yes, the data indicates a minor difference. The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 110.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 106 FPS. This is a small 4.4 FPS gap, suggesting that the visual upgrade to Ultra comes at a relatively low performance cost at this resolution.

Q: Does the combo's rank in the database suggest it is a top-tier performer for this game?

A: The combo ranks 392nd out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the top 11% of all tested systems, indicating that it is a very high-performing combination for Inside, even if it is not the absolute fastest.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1440p with the Medium preset?

A: The measured average FPS for the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is 282.4 FPS. This is a very high frame rate, comfortably exceeding the requirements of any high-refresh-rate monitor.

Best Settings per Resolution

The primary objective is to identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. Based on the measured data, every preset at every resolution clears this threshold with substantial margin. Therefore, the "best" setting is the Ultra preset in all cases, as it offers the highest visual fidelity while still delivering frame rates far above the playability standard.

  • 3840x2160 (4K): The Ultra preset is the best choice, running at an average of 106 FPS. This is the most visually demanding option and still provides a smooth experience.
  • 2560x1440 (1440p): The Ultra preset is the best choice, with an average of 170.3 FPS. This provides a significant performance buffer, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.
  • 1920x1080 (1080p): The Ultra preset is the best choice, achieving an average of 236.2 FPS. This frame rate is exceptionally high and will fully utilize most gaming monitors.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data for Inside reveals an interesting dynamic. The game appears to be remarkably light on both the CPU and GPU, but the scaling between resolutions provides insight into which component is more stressed.

In typical games, lowering resolution places more burden on the CPU, while raising resolution increases the GPU load. Here, the scaling is consistent but not extreme. At 1080p, the difference between Low (407.6 FPS) and Ultra (236.2 FPS) is 171.4 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (222.5 FPS) and Ultra (106 FPS) is 116.5 FPS. The fact that the gap narrows at higher resolutions suggests that the CPU is capable of maintaining high frame rates even when the GPU's workload increases.

Further evidence of a CPU-bound scenario at lower resolutions is the frame rate jump. From 1440p Ultra (170.3 FPS) to 1080p Ultra (236.2 FPS), there is a 65.9 FPS increase. This is a large gain, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor and can push far more frames when the GPU has less work. However, even at 4K Ultra, the system delivers 106 FPS, which is still far above the 60 FPS target. This suggests that neither component is critically stressed, but the CPU's headroom is more apparent at 1080p.

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, with its high multi-threaded performance (e.g., Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230), provides ample processing power. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, with its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, is also more than sufficient. The benchmark results indicate that the RTX 5070's performance, such as its Passmark G3D score of 29137, is not a bottleneck at any tested setting. The system's frame rates at all resolutions and presets are so high that the game is likely limited by the game engine's own frame rate cap or by the CPU's single-thread speed, not the GPU's raw power.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database provides nearest rivals for both components, which can be used to find hardware that would behave similarly in this game.

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D's average benchmark score is 39768. Its nearest rivals have very similar average scores, implying that they would produce comparable frame rates in Inside. These alternatives are:

  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS: Has an average score of 39603, a delta of 0.4% from the 9800X3D.
  • AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Has an average score of 40048, a delta of -0.7%.
  • AMD Ryzen AI 7 450: Has an average score of 39485, a delta of 0.7%.
  • AMD Ryzen 7 7700: Has an average score of 40081, a delta of -0.8%.

Given the negligible performance differences (all within 1%), a system with any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 5070 would yield almost identical frame rates in Inside.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's average benchmark score is 40377. Its nearest rivals also show very close performance levels:

  • AMD Radeon Pro 580: Has an average score of 40318, a delta of 0.1%.
  • AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100: Has an average score of 40063, a delta of 0.8%.
  • AMD Radeon Pro 5300: Has an average score of 40870, a delta of -1.2%.
  • NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile: Has an average score of 39568, a delta of 2%.

The performance deltas here are slightly larger but still minor, with the RTX A500 Mobile being 2% slower. A system with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and any of these GPUs would perform nearly identically to the tested configuration, maintaining exceptionally high frame rates across all settings.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Inside with outstanding performance. The verdict by resolution is clear:

  • 3840x2160: All presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the Ultra preset providing the best visual experience at an average of 106 FPS.
  • 2560x1440: All presets are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 170.3 FPS.
  • 1920x1080: All presets are playable, with the Ultra preset delivering an average of 236.2 FPS.

The system clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by a wide margin in every scenario. The lowest average frame rate recorded is 106 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still 76% higher than the minimum threshold. This means the user can enable the highest graphical settings at any resolution without worrying about performance drops below playable levels. The combination is not just capable; it is overkill for this title, ensuring a perfectly smooth experience on any display.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing ranks 392nd out of 3716 total combos. This places it in the 89th percentile of all tested systems, which is a very strong showing.

Given that the game is a puzzle platformer and not a demanding AAA title, this high rank is expected. The frame rates achieved are far higher than what is necessary for smooth gameplay. The rank indicates that while there are 391 other combinations that perform better, the vast majority of systems (3324 combos) will deliver lower performance. For the purpose of playing Inside, the difference between this combo and those ranked above it is likely imperceptible, as all would be running at hundreds of frames per second. The rank reinforces that this is a top-tier setup for this game, offering maximum headroom for any future or more demanding titles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is the complete set of measured average frame rates for this hardware combination in Inside. No minimum or maximum frame rate data was recorded for any setting, so only the average values are listed.

1920x1080

  • Low: 407.6 FPS
  • Medium: 376.3 FPS
  • High: 250.7 FPS
  • Ultra: 236.2 FPS

2560x1440

  • Low: 356.2 FPS
  • Medium: 282.4 FPS
  • High: 176.4 FPS
  • Ultra: 170.3 FPS

3840x2160

  • Low: 222.5 FPS
  • Medium: 181.9 FPS
  • High: 110.4 FPS
  • Ultra: 106.0 FPS

The data shows a clear and consistent pattern: frame rates decrease as resolution and graphical fidelity increase. The highest performance is achieved at 1080p with Low settings, while the most demanding scenario is 4K Ultra. Even in the most demanding case, the average frame rate remains well above the 60 FPS playability threshold, demonstrating the exceptional capability of this hardware for this specific game.