Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 75 | 120 | 150 |
| 1440p QHD | 114 | 120 | 192 | 239 |
| 1080p Full HD | 159 | 167 | 266 | 333 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
# Can AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Run Inside?
The short answer is yes, but the data reveals a more nuanced story. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination demonstrates a remarkable capacity to run Inside at high frame rates across all tested resolutions. Our benchmark results show this pairing is not just adequate; it is significantly overqualified, especially at 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU's immense single-thread strength keeps the frame rate consistently high.
The data indicates a clear pattern: this combo is a high-refresh-rate powerhouse at 1440p and 1080p, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, pulling the average FPS down to a level that is still very playable but much closer to the 60 FPS threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this configuration is as follows, broken down by resolution and preset. The average FPS (avgFps) is the headline metric, with minimum (minFps) and maximum (maxFps) values provided for context.
3840x2160 (4K)
- High: Average 75 FPS.
- Low: Average 150 FPS.
- Medium: Average 120 FPS, with minimums and maximums of 102 and 138 FPS respectively.
- Ultra: Average 72 FPS.
At 4K, the "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, but the combo still averages a highly playable 72 FPS. The "Low" preset is where this CPU+GPU combo truly shines, hitting a massive 150 FPS average. This suggests that at 4K, the RTX 4060 is the primary limiter. The CPU has headroom to spare.
2560x1440 (1440p)
- High: Average 120 FPS.
- Low: Average 239 FPS.
- Medium: Average 192 FPS, with min/max of 163 and 220 FPS.
- Ultra: Average 114 FPS.
At 1440p, the frame rates are extremely high. Even on the "Ultra" preset, the combo stays above 114 FPS, which is far beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold. This resolution is arguably the "sweet spot" for this pairing, as it offers excellent visual fidelity without overly taxing the GPU.
1920x1080 (1080p)
- High: Average 167 FPS.
- Low: Average 333 FPS.
- Medium: Average 266 FPS, with a minimum of 226 and a maximum of 306 FPS.
- Ultra: Average 159 FPS.
At 1080p, the results are staggering. Even at the "Ultra" preset, the system is averaging 159 FPS, which is more than 2.6x the 60 FPS target. The "Low" preset hits 333 FPS, which is beyond the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. It's clear that at this resolution, the Ryzen 7 9700X is not being challenged; the RTX 4060 is the main component doing the heavy lifting, but both are overqualified for 1080p gaming.
FAQ
Q: What resolution is this combo best for?
A: The data suggests the "sweet spot" is 2560x1440. At this resolution, the "Ultra" preset averages 114 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold while still offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p. At 4K, the system still performs well, but the "Ultra" preset's average of 72 FPS is closer to the threshold.
Q: I have a 60Hz monitor. Should I lock to 60 FPS?
A: No. At 1080p and 1440p, all presets get well above 114 FPS, and the GPU will be idle a lot. Let it run uncapped to get maximum visual quality. At 4K, capping at 60 FPS is advisable for power savings and to avoid any potential screen tearing, as the GPU will be pushed much closer to its limit.
Q: Is the 8-core CPU or the GPU more important here?
A: At 4K, the GPU is the determining component. The data shows a clear scaling curve: the 4K "Ultra" preset gets 72 FPS, while 1440p "Ultra" gets 114 FPS. This difference is caused by the GPU hitting its fill-rate limits. The CPU has more than enough power at every resolution. At 1080p, the GPU is also often idle, capping out at 159 FPS on "Ultra" where the CPU's strong single-core and multi-core performance is the main leader.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, the Ryzen 7 9700X is not the bottleneck. The jump from 192 FPS (Medium) to 239 FPS (Low) shows that the game is still lightly CPU-bound in this mid-range. But the GPU is the main reason we see 114 FPS at "Ultra" — a 52% drop from the "Low" preset.
Q: Is this a 4K-capable system?
A: Yes, but just barely. The "Ultra" preset at 4K averages 72 FPS, which is 20% above the 60 FPS threshold. This is playable but not ideal. If you want a locked 60+ FPS with headroom, the 1440p "Ultra" setting is a safer bet (114 FPS avg), or you can lower to "High" at 4K (75 FPS).
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a shifting bottleneck depending on resolution.
At 4K, the RTX 4060 is the primary frame rate limiter. The GPU's shading units and ROPs are stressed by the 8.3 million pixels. The CPU's role is supportive, and its strong single-core performance prevents it from becoming the main constraint.
At 1440p, the balance of power is more even. However, the GPU is still the most critical piece. The frame rate drops from 239 (1080p Low) to 114 (1440p Ultra), a 52% decline, which is almost entirely attributed to the GPU's rendering resolution.
At 1080p, the CPU's excellent single-core performance is the limiter. The GPU is practically overkill; the 333 FPS average at "Low" is artificially capping due to the game's engine and CPU power. This is a scenario where the Ryzen's 16 threads are only lightly loaded.
The scaling behavior between resolutions is indicative. Between 1080p "Ultra" (159 FPS) and 1440p "Ultra" (114 FPS), we see a 28% drop due to the 1.78x more pixels. Then, going to 4K "Ultra" (72 FPS), the drop is another 37% off the 1440p figure. The CPU is not causing these drops; the GPU is the primary driver.
The Verdict
*Yes, this PC can run Inside.*
The data is unambiguous. Here's the resolution-by-resolution breakdown, relative to the 60 FPS playability threshold:
- 3840x2160: The "Ultra" preset averages 72 FPS, the "High" preset 75 FPS. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are above 60 FPS. Clear pass.
- 2560x1440: The "Ultra" preset averages 114 FPS. The most demanding preset is nearly 2x the 60 FPS threshold. Clear pass.
- 1920x1080: The "Ultra" preset averages 159 FPS. The "Medium" preset dips to a 266 FPS average, the lowest of all settings but still 4.4x higher than the 60 FPS requirement. Overwhelming pass.
The evidence indicates this is a very capable 1080p and 1440p machine, and a solid 4K machine. The 9700X's massive single-thread lead gives the 4060 the freedom to focus on visual tasks at lower resolutions. At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor. The "High" preset at 75 FPS average is the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate at this resolution.
Similar Performance
If you're considering similar hardware, the closest data points are the Intel Core i9-14901E (average score 37911, just 0.1% higher) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (average 37904, 0.1% higher), but here's the interesting part: the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a 0.3% difference. In gaming, these are all essentially identical CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded P132 (average 37804) is the only one with a slightly bigger gap (0.4%), but it's still within noise margins.
On the GPU side, the nearest competitors are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% lower), the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% behind. All these GPUs are within the same class as the RTX 4060 and will behave similarly.
Best Settings per Resolution
To maximize frame rates while keeping the game visually impressive, use the "Ultra" preset at each resolution. The data shows that the "Ultra" preset is the most demanding but still well above 60 FPS:
- 3840x2160: "Ultra" yields 72 FPS average. It's the best-looking preset that still guarantees a 60+ experience.
- 2560x1440: "Ultra" averages 114 FPS. It gives the best visual quality with massive headroom.
- 1920x1080: "Ultra" yields 159 FPS avg. The visual improvement over "High" is noticeable, and the frame rate is absolutely no concern.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific combo (CPU + GPU) is ranked #1863 out of 3716 tested combos. This places it comfortably in the top 50% of all tested configurations, but it's not a top-tier combo. The CPU is a very high-end part, but the GPU is the limiting factor, making this a strong 1080p / 1440p combo, while at 4K it falls to a mid-range standing. For a 4K-focused build, you'd want a higher-tier GPU. The combo is a great match for high-refresh 1440p gaming, as the 4060's 8GB of VRAM gives all the headroom needed.