Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 131 | 138 | 220 | 275 |
| 1440p QHD | 209 | 219 | 350 | 386 |
| 1080p Full HD | 290 | 305 | 398 | 431 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers an overwhelming performance margin in Inside, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold by more than double at every resolution and preset tested. The benchmark data shows this pairing is not merely capable; it is excessive for the game's demands, with the lowest recorded average frame rate still hitting 131 FPS at 4K Ultra. Across all tested configurations, this system never approaches a performance ceiling, making it a definitive choice for maxing out this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a consistent pattern of extreme headroom. At 1920x1080, the system produces staggering frame rates that are largely irrelevant for standard 60 Hz or even 144 Hz displays, but they demonstrate the raw throughput available. At Low settings, the average FPS reaches 431. Moving to Medium, the average dips slightly to 398 FPS, with a minimum of 338 FPS and a maximum of 457 FPS. High settings see the average drop to 305 FPS. At the maximum Ultra preset, the average is still a massive 290 FPS, which is nearly five times the playability threshold.
The 2560x1440 resolution shows the same story of overwhelming performance, with only a modest reduction in frame rates compared to 1080p. The Low preset averages 386 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 350 FPS, with the minimum frame rate recorded at 298 FPS and the maximum at 403 FPS, indicating excellent frame pacing. High settings produce an average of 219 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration, still yields an average of 209 FPS, comfortably placing the system far beyond the 60 FPS target.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the system finally begins to show a more significant load, but it still does not break a sweat. The Low preset averages 275 FPS. The Medium preset provides an average of 220 FPS, with a minimum of 187 FPS and a maximum of 253 FPS. High settings average 138 FPS. The Ultra preset, the highest stress test in the data, still maintains an average of 131 FPS. This figure is critical as it represents the "worst case" scenario in the dataset, and it is still more than double the 60 FPS threshold, proving the GPU and CPU are never the bottleneck.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, unequivocally. The data shows that at 3840x2160, the system achieves playable frame rates at all tested settings. The lowest average FPS recorded at 4K is 131 FPS on the Ultra preset, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this game with this hardware?
A: The verdict data indicates that the "best settings" are the Ultra preset at every resolution tested. At 1920x1080, this yields an average of 290 FPS; at 2560x1440, it yields 209 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it yields 131 FPS. There is no performance-based reason to choose lower settings.
Q: Is there any scenario where this combo drops below 60 FPS?
A: No. Across the entire measured FPS dataset, which includes 12 distinct combinations of resolution and settings, the absolute minimum average frame rate recorded is 131 FPS at 4K Ultra. The lowest minimum FPS recorded in any benchmark run is 187 FPS, which occurred at 4K Medium settings.
Q: How does the performance scale between 1080p and 4K?
A: The scaling is very efficient. Comparing Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 398 at 1920x1080 to 350 at 2560x1440, and then to 220 at 3840x2160. This represents a roughly 45% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K, which is a relatively small penalty for a 4x increase in pixel count, indicating the system is not heavily pixel-bound.
Q: Is the 60 FPS target easily achieved on the Ultra preset?
A: The Ultra preset is achieved with massive headroom. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 131, which is 71 FPS above the target. At 1440p Ultra, the average is 209, and at 1080p Ultra, it is 290. The system exceeds the target by over 118% even in the most demanding scenario.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in this game?
A: The data suggests the system is never limited by either component in a way that affects playability. The frame rates are consistently high across all resolutions, and the scaling from 1080p to 4K is present but not dramatic, suggesting both components have significant headroom. The high minimum FPS values, such as 338 at 1080p Medium, indicate stable delivery without stutters.
CPU and GPU Roles
Analyzing the scaling between resolutions and presets clarifies the role each component plays in Inside. The game is not particularly demanding on modern hardware, and the data reflects that both the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 spend most of their time far from maximum utilization.
The GPU's role becomes more apparent at higher resolutions. The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 increases the pixel rendering workload significantly. This is visible in the frame rate drops: at Medium settings, the average FPS falls from 398 at 1080p to 220 at 4K. This 178 FPS difference is primarily attributable to the GPU working harder to fill the additional pixels. However, the fact that the 4K Medium average is still 220 FPS indicates the RTX 5080 is not being pushed to its limit.
The CPU's role is more prominent at lower resolutions where the GPU can render frames quickly. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 431 FPS. This extreme frame rate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with draw calls and game logic at a very high rate. The Ryzen 7 9700F, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides sufficient single-thread and multi-thread performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck, even at these high frame rates.
The scaling pattern also indicates that the performance difference between presets is relatively uniform across resolutions. For example, the delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 141 FPS (431 to 290), while at 4K it is 144 FPS (275 to 131). This consistency suggests that neither component is being disproportionately stressed by the settings changes; the workload scales evenly. The system is balanced for this title, with the GPU taking on more responsibility as resolution increases, but the CPU maintaining a solid foundation for high frame rates at all times.
The Verdict
The verdict is unambiguous: this PC can run Inside with exceptional performance. The verdictByResolution data lists all tested settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—as "playable" at every resolution. The playability threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and the system exceeds this with significant margin.
At 3840x2160, the recommended best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 131 FPS. This is more than double the threshold, confirming that 4K gaming is not just possible but optimal. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 209 FPS, providing a fluid experience on even high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 290 FPS, which is suitable for the fastest displays available. In summary, users should select the Ultra preset at their native resolution without any concern for performance. The data shows no reason to compromise on visual quality for this game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data for both the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would deliver a similar experience in this system. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996. Its closest rivals, according to the data, are the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with a score of 69875 (a 0.2% difference), the Intel Core i7-14700KF with a score of 70163 (a -0.2% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with a score of 69515 (a 0.7% difference). These processors are within a 0.9% performance band of the Ryzen 7 9700F, meaning that swapping to any of them would result in virtually identical frame rates in Inside, as the game is unlikely to stress any of these CPUs to their limits.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55757 (a 0.6% difference), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with a score of 55698 (a 0.7% difference), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with a score of 54828 (a 2.3% difference). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367, which is -2.2% relative to the RTX 5080. These GPUs offer similar raw compute performance. Given the enormous performance headroom in Inside, any of these alternatives would also likely deliver frame rates well above the 60 FPS target, although the exact measured FPS would depend on their specific driver optimizations.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks exceptionally high for Inside. The data specifies a combo rank of 68 out of 3716 total tested combinations. This places the system in the top 1.8% of all tested rigs for this specific game.
This high rank is consistent with the measured FPS data. The system's ability to maintain an average of 290 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 131 FPS at 4K Ultra demonstrates a level of performance that is rare among the tested population. The 4K Ultra result is particularly telling; many systems in the database would struggle to maintain 60 FPS at that setting, but this combo does so with more than 100% headroom. The rank of 68 confirms that, for Inside, this is a top-tier configuration, and users can expect a definitive, lag-free experience at maximum settings on any resolution.