Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 54 | 87 | 108 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 86 | 138 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 120 | 192 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a surprisingly strong performance profile in Inside, a 2D puzzle-platformer that is not typically demanding by modern standards. Benchmark data, measured across three resolutions and four quality presets, indicates this pairing provides a wide range of playable configurations, with the primary limitation appearing only at 4K Ultra settings. The data suggests that users can expect a fluid experience at 1080p and 1440p with maximum graphical fidelity, while 4K requires a modest reduction in settings to stay comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.
FAQ
Q: What is the best quality preset for this combo at 4K?
A: The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which achieves an average of 87 FPS. While the High preset is playable at 54 FPS, it falls below the 60 FPS threshold, and Low runs at 108 FPS.
*Q: Can this system handle Inside at maximum settings on a 1440p monitor?*
A: Yes, the data indicates that the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 yields an average of 82 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset also performs admirably at 86 FPS, while Low and Medium run at 172 and 138 FPS respectively.
Q: Is the frame rate consistent at 1440p Medium settings?
A: The benchmark shows an average of 138 FPS for this configuration, with a minimum frame rate of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. This indicates a stable performance window with no significant frame drops.
Q: What is the performance ceiling for this combo at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 114 FPS. The Low preset reaches a maximum average of 240 FPS, showcasing the system's ability to push very high frame rates when settings are reduced.
*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Inside?*
A: This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 2983rd out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this particular game. This ranking is influenced by the game's relatively low system requirements, where most modern hardware will perform well.
Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck at 4K Ultra settings?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution and preset. The average frame rate drops to 52 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is below the playable threshold, whereas the CPU has ample headroom as indicated by its strong performance at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 2983 out of 3716 tested combinations might seem low at first glance, but it must be contextualized within the game's undemanding nature. Inside is a 2D puzzle-platformer released in 2016, and as such, it does not stress modern hardware the way a contemporary 3D title would. Most systems in the database, regardless of their price point, will likely achieve playable frame rates. This ranking does not indicate a weak system; rather, it reflects that a large number of hardware configurations can run this game smoothly, making the differentiation between them less significant. The data shows that the limiting factor here is not the CPU's processing power but the GPU's ability to handle the higher pixel count at 4K with maximum settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the Intel Arc B570 shifts depending on the resolution and quality settings. At 1920x1080, the CPU's performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the massive jump in frame rates when moving from High (120 FPS) to Low (240 FPS). This suggests the GPU is the primary determinant of performance, even at lower resolutions, because the CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads that are not fully taxed by the game's logic. Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU workload increases, but the system still has ample resources. The scaling from 1080p High (120 FPS) to 1440p High (86 FPS) shows a 28% drop in performance, which is directly attributable to the increased pixel count the GPU must render.
The most telling data point for GPU-bound behavior is at 3840x2160. Here, the Ultra preset falls to 52 FPS, while the Medium preset remains at 87 FPS. This dramatic difference of 35 FPS between Medium and Ultra at 4K, compared to a smaller delta at 1440p (56 FPS), highlights that the GPU is working near its limit. The CPU's role at 4K is less critical, as the frame rate is constrained by the graphics card's fill rate and shading power. The Intel Arc B570, with its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, has enough memory bandwidth for 4K, but its shader throughput is the bottleneck for the most demanding settings. In summary, the CPU provides a stable foundation, but the GPU dictates the maximum achievable frame rate at higher resolutions and presets.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users considering this pairing, the benchmark data offers several points of comparison. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700's average benchmark score of 40081 places it in a tight competitive group. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, which scores 40048 (0.1% faster), and the Intel Core 5 221E, which scores 40144 (0.2% slower). The AMD Ryzen 9 270 is also close, with a score of 40246 (0.4% slower), as is the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40313 (0.6% slower). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning a user could expect near-identical CPU-bound performance from any of these processors when paired with the same graphics card.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 is closely matched by several other graphics cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.1% faster), while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% slower). The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are also within a narrow margin, scoring 20480 (0.4% faster) and 20662 (0.5% slower) respectively. For Inside, these GPUs would behave almost identically, meaning that swapping the Arc B570 for an RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750 would not yield a perceptible difference in frame rates. The data indicates that the performance envelope for this class of hardware is very consistent, making the choice between these components largely dependent on other factors like driver features or platform compatibility.
Best Settings per Resolution
The optimal settings for this hardware combination are determined by which preset maintains an average frame rate of at least 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 87 FPS. While the High preset is close at 54 FPS, it falls short of the playable threshold, so Medium is the most demanding setting that provides a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the system has more headroom. The Ultra preset is fully playable, achieving an average of 82 FPS, and it is therefore the recommended setting for maximum visual quality. The High preset at 86 FPS is also viable, but Ultra offers the best experience without compromising frame rate.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear winner, with an average of 114 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the data shows that even the most demanding settings are easily handled at this resolution. For players prioritizing high refresh rates, the Low preset at 240 FPS is an option, but the Ultra preset provides a balanced experience with high frame rates. The data confirms that for 1080p gaming, the user can enable all graphical options without worrying about performance dips, as even the minimum frame rates at Medium settings (163 FPS) are far above the playable threshold.
The Verdict
The benchmark results unequivocally show that the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B570 can run Inside with excellent performance across all common resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the game at Ultra settings with an average of 114 FPS, providing a silky-smooth experience. The 2560x1440 resolution is also a strong point for this combo, with Ultra settings achieving an average of 82 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS target. For users with a 4K display, the system remains highly playable, though some settings adjustment is necessary. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 delivers an average of 87 FPS, while the High preset drops to 54 FPS and is not recommended for a consistent 60 FPS experience.
In practical terms, this means the system clears the 60 FPS threshold for all presets at 1080p and 1440p, and for Medium and Low presets at 4K. The only configuration that fails to meet the playable standard is 4K Ultra, which averages 52 FPS. Given the game's genre and style, this is a minor limitation. The data suggests that this hardware pairing is more than adequate for a smooth and enjoyable playthrough of Inside, with the only trade-off being the need to choose Medium settings for 4K displays to maintain a consistent frame rate. Overall, the system provides a robust gaming experience for this title, with the GPU being the sole factor preventing maximum settings at 4K.