Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
294 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
180 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
265 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
130 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
174 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
79 FPS
5.3ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 27,896
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 17,208

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 79 86 135 174
1440p QHD 130 134 219 265
1080p Full HD 180 190 274 294

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 190
1920x1080 Low 294
1920x1080 Medium 274
1920x1080 Ultra 180
2560x1440 High 134
2560x1440 Low 265
2560x1440 Medium 219
2560x1440 Ultra 130
3840x2160 High 86
3840x2160 Low 174
3840x2160 Medium 135
3840x2160 Ultra 79

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer. Measured data shows this pairing is far beyond the demands of the game at all tested resolutions, with average frame rates never dipping below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The benchmark results indicate a system that provides a completely smooth experience, even at maximum settings and 4K resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest playable fidelity with Ultra settings, producing an average of 179.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays well above the 60 FPS threshold. Even at these settings, the frame rate is nearly three times the playable mark.

Moving to 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is again Ultra, with an average of 129.8 FPS. This is a substantial drop from the 1080p result, but still leaves a massive performance headroom. The data shows the system is not strained by this resolution.

At the highest tested resolution of 3840x2160, the combination still handles Ultra settings with an average of 78.9 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin of 18.9 FPS. The verdict data confirms that Ultra is the best setting at 4K, ensuring the highest visual quality while remaining playable.

The performance scaling across resolutions shows that the system is consistently powerful. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, the data indicates that Ultra settings are achievable at every resolution, with the 4K average of 78.9 FPS being the only scenario that drops below the 100 FPS mark. For those seeking extremely high refresh rates, the Low preset at 1080p yields 293.8 FPS, and Medium at 1080p yields 274.1 FPS, both of which would benefit high-refresh-rate displays.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Inside shows a clear shift in system bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, ranging from 179.6 FPS (Ultra) to 293.8 FPS (Low). The difference between Low and Ultra is 114.2 FPS, which suggests that while the GPU is being tasked more with higher settings, the CPU is still able to feed it enough data to maintain these high rates. This indicates a balanced load.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p provides insight into the GPU's role. The frame rates at 1440p are significantly higher than at 4K, but lower than at 1080p. For instance, at Ultra settings, the frame rate drops from 179.6 FPS at 1080p to 129.8 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 49.8 FPS. This drop is directly attributable to the increased resolution, which increases the workload on the GPU. This suggests the GPU is a significant determinant of performance.

At 3840x2160, the pressure on the GPU becomes even more apparent. The Ultra setting yields 78.9 FPS, which is 50.9 FPS lower than the 1440p result. The Low setting at 4K yields 173.8 FPS, which is 90.7 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. This consistent decline with each resolution step indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The data shows that while the CPU is not fully limiting at lower resolutions, the GPU becomes the dominant factor as pixel count increases.

The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, has a strong multithreaded score of 14317 in Cinebench R23 and a single-thread score of 1452, which allows it to handle the game's logic and draw calls without becoming a limiting factor. The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is more than sufficient for this game, as the frame rate scaling between settings and resolutions is primarily dictated by the GPU's rendering workload.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores are closely matched. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U has an average score of 27887, which is a 0% difference from the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's average of 27896. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, a -0.1% difference, and the Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27799, a 0.3% difference. In practice, all of these processors would behave nearly identically in this game, as the frame rate is unlikely to be CPU-limited at the high GPU load levels seen in the data.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are also very close in performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average score of 17083, which is a 0.7% difference from the RTX 3070's 17208. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, a 1% difference, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a 1.1% difference. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468, a -1.5% difference. These small deltas mean that swapping the RTX 3070 for any of these would result in virtually identical frame rates in Inside. The benchmark results show these are all within a narrow performance band.

FAQ

Q: Is this system capable of running Inside at 4K?

A: Yes. The measured frame rates show that the system averages 78.9 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All settings are considered playable at 4K.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 1440p for the highest visual quality?

A: The data identifies Ultra as the best setting at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 129.8 FPS. This is the highest preset tested and it does not compromise the playable frame rate.

Q: How does the CPU perform relative to its rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average benchmark score of 27896. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 27887, a 0% difference. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872, a 0.1% difference. The performance is effectively equivalent to these rivals.

Q: How does the GPU performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average score of 17208, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17083. This represents a 0.7% difference in performance, meaning a user would not notice any significant difference between them in this game.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS achieved by this combination?

A: The lowest average frame rate recorded in the data is 78.9 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is still above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the system maintain high frame rates even at the highest settings?

A: Yes, the data confirms that at 4K Ultra, the system achieves 78.9 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it reaches 129.8 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra, it attains 179.6 FPS. All of these are significant margins above the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following average frame rates were measured for this combination. There are no min or max frame rate values provided in the data, so only the average is presented.

3840x2160

  • Low: 173.8 FPS
  • Medium: 135.2 FPS
  • High: 85.5 FPS
  • Ultra: 78.9 FPS

2560x1440

  • Low: 264.5 FPS
  • Medium: 219.1 FPS
  • High: 133.9 FPS
  • Ultra: 129.8 FPS

1920x1080

  • Low: 293.8 FPS
  • Medium: 274.1 FPS
  • High: 189.8 FPS
  • Ultra: 179.6 FPS

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ranked 1486 out of 3716 tested system combinations for this game. This places it in the top 40% of all tested systems. The data indicates that while this is a very capable setup for most games, its ranking here is likely influenced by the fact that the game is not demanding and many other, potentially more powerful, combinations have also been tested. The rank is a relative measure of the system's overall performance among all configurations, and a rank of 1486 out of 3716 indicates a solidly above-average position. The high frame rates measured in this game are proof of the system's ability to handle even the most demanding settings with ease.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: this PC is more than capable of running Inside. The verdict by resolution confirms that all settings are playable at all three tested resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average frame rate of 179.6 FPS. This is over three times the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, with an average frame rate of 129.8 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, with an average frame rate of 78.9 FPS. This is the only scenario that drops below the triple-digit mark, but it still provides a large margin over the 60 FPS threshold.

The benchmark results indicate that this system will provide a flawless experience at maximum graphical settings, regardless of the resolution used. The frame rates are so high that users could also consider high refresh rate monitors for a smoother experience. The system is never in danger of falling below the 60 FPS threshold at any of the tested settings, making it an excellent choice for playing Inside.